Re: [PD] ANN: New Pd-L2Ork x86_64 and Raspberry Pi 20140319 release candidate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2014-03-22 17:03, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote: Apologies for x-posting. i seem to remember that i have asked you this question multiple times in private, but never received an answer: is there *any* reason to make your announcements via pd-list instead of pd-announce [1]? all emails to pd-announce are forwarded to pd-list, but some people are only subscribed to pd-announce (as they are not interested in day-to-day discussion). btw, anybody can post to pd-announce (all emails get manual moderation and are allowed if they are a proper announcement related to Pd somehow). (resending because apparently the original was rejected because I was not subscribed?...) no. it was rejected because the mailinglist has a built-in cross-posting reject rule. see [2]. hope this clarifies the problem. fgmasdr IOhannes [1] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-announce [2] http://ccit.mines.edu/Mailman-FAQ#29 - -- IEM - network operation center mailto:n...@iem.at -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTL/nmAAoJELZQGcR/ejb4M3IP/3g7PwBdzgANOur/McPFOmuV RAFcyrJJ91zdY1a2nqKEw/ZJaxdsXpTS9PcUIcBeA11rrKhIpT21sYQAQfZcTto7 ALILdBvMyeg1+gcqgI2MXAdpeuJ5GaSMTwe/yA6PjLtdApUyqfrwio38A97tTM0t XbnX/g2eBljMl8zJXqgo8jCf6HzrHVIz/drrny7TYP19pJ4E4Gaav/6wP6L+On5F pdao2wh/6q1MAV8+y7FE/kGWkEGLFoAjtUYNOnis4KNv8SEaKhRAa+83W65tWiRc lwj/dUIJ8AT7VZjQpYuxkEIu7u8CVEaAZJ1Ln/JxbdsiCE6ITX+J1QWhUOo4QAVX GZUnvChWiT0NVuLl0Iw1MPF7e+netlM8Oma80UzUpL7BCbizZOYdKJs44DusZ48p cK0W7z58pX5psCMopECq0Y+MYv4B1M7pHidH4a4OMbyzUF9L/AfD6NqTJDE2TH5U HPCXJ2DT8c9tsIN2tQ6VKwOoxFjnoxsw3L696TTBLampn0KmRfNQKZXKUHFKBDUp XQLd4fT7ao0nvrDGdXT10cZY5glnklGXSDeg4XX58Y46NTOfva3A6OVTP/zHP8sn mFndutNRQF4PBvWCREeTJp8r3uYvIJW1zgg3lrQYTmR0OicX9MKfdkRoxlWi+9En pX8nkF4Dyi06vw3p5F1w =xzaR -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
[PD] network maintainance: 18.07.2012 10:00-12:00CEST
due to a scheduled network maintainance, puredata.info and associated services (including the pd related mailinglists) will be offline tomorrow, wednesday starting at 10:00 (CEST). we hope to be online again within two hours. sorry for the inconvenience. fgasdr IOhannes -- IEM - network operation center mailto:n...@iem.at ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
[PD] [PD-announce] news from the server admins
as some of you might have noticed, puredata.info has vanished for some days, taking the mailing-lists and the website with it. the reason for the downtime was brutal aggression involving horrible things like rootkits and backdoors and whatelse. the never-sleeping puredata.info administration crew has worked countless hours (if not days) to restore the machine back to it's un-compromised state, and is happy to announce that hopefully the evil spores have been eridicated, the rootkits have been dismantled and backdoors have been locked for good. we also believe that the injection vector has been found and fixed. fgmasdr IOhannes PS: in any case, please refrain from attacking puredata.info in the future; the community's everlasting gratitude will be yours -- IEM - network operation center mailto:n...@iem.at ___ Pd-announce mailing list pd-annou...@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-announce ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] [PD-announce] news from the server admins
On 2011-01-07 20:28, IEM - network operating center (IOhannes m zmoelnig) wrote: we also believe that the injection vector has been found and fixed. only to find, that now the harddisk controller is making troubles. though sleepless by design, the puredata.info administration team will now have to get some sleep. famsdr IOhannes -- IEM - network operation center mailto:n...@iem.at ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
[PD] [ot] sueing the mailing list...
hi all, sorry for posting an OT mail to the mainlist, but i really want to have as many opinions as posible on this. i (as list admin) have just received an email by somebody who wants their mail to be removed from the archive: snip Subject: FORMAT NOTICE August, 22 2010 I posted a message on the pd-announce list, being not aware that it was a public list: http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-announce/ Someone replied to my message, also publicly, on the pd-list list: http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/X Today, I ask you to remove these two messages from your website, because I don't want my name to appear publicly on the web. If they are not removed within 15 days, I will do the necessary to sue you. XXX X /snip i must say, that i'm a bit perplex. while in principal i'm not opposed to removing the post if they have any problems with it, however, i find the tone at least impertinent, and would prefer to not give way to a threat to sue. i have thus answered: answer hold on! i understand that you probably don't want an unsubscribe request to be available in a public archive. however, all the pd-mailinglists have always made it clear, that everything will be archived and made available to the public. thus, by subscribing to one of those mailinglists, you have given your agreement that all your postings to the list will be made available via those archives. furthermore, you are of course free to ask that your posting is removed from the archives. however, if somebody replied to your posting and has made this available to the public, then i don't see what entitles you to request a removal. it is their posting. the pd-lists are an open forum. they are no place to threaten people with sueing. fgmadsr IOhannes /answer what do you think of all this? fgmasdr IOhannes -- IEM - network operation center mailto:n...@iem.at ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] moving gemwin
On 2010-07-15 09:11, Andy Farnell wrote: Yikes! Please don't do that Jose. You just jammed up hundreds of peoples mailboxes. i have re-enabled a check for the maximum message size, and set it to 2MB. i hope this is ok for everybody. fgmasr IOhannes -- IEM - network operation center mailto:n...@iem.at ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
[PD] [OT][admin] changing the mailinglist headers
hi all. as has been discussed on this list a while ago, i would like to change the mailinglist-headers to conform to http://puredata.info/docs/faq/pdspelling this means: changing PD to Pd changing PureData to Pure Data what will change: the subject of each mail will be prefixed with [Pd] rather than [PD] the List-Id will contain a string Pure Data rather than PureData what will remain: the List-Id will still contain the actual ID pd-list.iem.at content will stay as super as always list of affected lists: Pd-list: Subject-prefix: [Pd] List-ID: the Pure Data - mailinglist pd-list.iem.at Pd-announce: Subject-prefix: [Pd-announce] List-ID: Announcements for Pure Data pd-announce.iem.at Pd-dev: Subject-prefix: [Pd-dev] List-ID: Pure Data developer's list pd-dev.iem.at Pd-ot: Subject-prefix: [Pd-ot] List-ID: off topic discussions for the Pd-community pd-ot.iem. Pd-cvs: Subject-prefix: [Pd-cvs] List-ID: information on commits to the Pd-cvs pd-cvs.iem.at if you do any email filtering based on the list-headers this might not work thereafter. in general, if you want to do filter/sort/... mails from a mailing-list, you should _always_ do so based on the list-id part of the List-ID header-field (that is: on the part between angle-brackets ). see http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2919.txt for a technical explanation. fmgasdr, IOhannes -- IEM - network operation center mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
[PD] [ot] googlegroups vs. pd-list
hello. sorry for posting [OT] to this list, but i fear the OT-list will not reach the person in charge. it seems like somebody has subscribed pd-list to the googlegroups (either directly or indirectly, i don't know), since i (as list-administrator) get repeated rejects for pd-list digests from googlegroups.com. whoever did it, please undo it. before you subscribe a non-person (e.g. another mailing list, an archive, a groups-system,...) to a mailing list you should be aware of al lthe technical and social implications of your doing and make sure that a minimum of problems is likely to occur. on the sovial level: many member of this list have repeatedly expressed there concerns about unknowingly posting to whatever groups. even though the pd-lists _are_ public and there archives _are_ publically available, this is not a realy excuse to publish postings of an author without them knowing. on the technical level: mailinglists often do not stack very well (especially those with restricted access), as this is not what the developpers of the list-software (usually) had in mind. problems range from bouncing emails via mail-loops to ... you ought to know which software is used on both sides and be aware of any problems that might arise by combining these 2 softwares. you ought not think about subscribing a list before these problems are sorted out. fmga.sdr IOhannes -- IEM - network operation center mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
