[PD] Puredata patch group in Columbus, Ohio

Hey All, Do we have any Pd users here in Columbus, Ohio? If so, is anyone interested in establishing a patching group? Cheers, ~Brandon ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

[PD] tabwrite~ index parameter

Hi PD-List. Why isn't tabwrite~ able to accept an index inlet (like [tabwrite]) at audio rate? I'm looking to make a tape-loop emulation patch, but its not seeming as straight forward as I would have hoped. Am I missing something, or would there be another way of going about this?

Re: [PD] [PD-dev] [ pure-data-Bugs-1942204 ] pdpedia Captcha

Don't forget to turn on the spam regex in mediawiki... I bet there are a lot of div elements with display: hidden as an inline style. My day job's wiki was spammed like this, we had a lot of porno ads hiding in hidden div elements. See these links:

Re: [PD] Compiling netsend~/netreceive~ on intel mac

Have you been able to build netsend~/netreceive~? After a few tweaks, I was able to get the full piece built. You can also grab the binaries from Hans' latest i386 OS X build: http://autobuild.puredata.info/auto-build/2008-02-22/ In order to get the two pieces to build, you'll need to

Re: [PD] call for old PC100/PC133 RAM donations

By the way, its available super-cheap on ebay: http://search.ebay.com/search/search.dll?from=R40_trksid=m37satitle=pc133category0= How much do you need, I'm willing to procure a few gigs from ebay and send them your way :) I'll check my parents house as well, they might have 256mb or so

Re: [PD] PD crashes on mac OSX with Jack

You'll need a newer build of pd-extended. Try this one and let us know of your results: http://autobuild.puredata.info/auto-build/2008-02-22/Pd-0.40.3-extended-20080222-macosx104-i386.dmg Cheers, ~Brandon On Mar 20, 2008, at 7:09 PM, pzuspann wrote: I recently installed JackOSX and PD

Re: [PD] Pd sounds better than Max?

Well, why couldn't Pd be as clean, processors are fast enough these days, and one could always crank up the sample rates of their DSP blocks. Isn't the internal resolution at least 32bit anyway (is it 64bit under any circumstances?) cheers, ~brandon On Mar 8, 2008, at 4:25 PM, Andy

Re: [PD] parallel processing

Along with the question posed by Marius, how does PD currently scale on SMP systems with 2, 4, or 8 cores? Cheers, ~Brandon On Mar 4, 2008, at 11:39 AM, marius schebella wrote: No, I missed LAC, but it is not surprising that people research in that direction. I was looking through some

Re: [PD] some new music written with PD

Very nice! Did you use Pd extensively when making your records which are available on bleep.com? (by the way, how did you get your stuff on bleep?) peace, ~Brandon On Feb 29, 2008, at 12:07 PM, Andy Farnell wrote: That was really nice Max, good chillout stylee, smooth flow, without

Re: [PD] Pd-0.40.3-extended-20080221-macosx104-i386.dmg

Thanks, Hans! I was able to build pd with your changes to svn. I'll have extended built here shortly. ~Bsoi On Feb 22, 2008, at 8:07 AM, Dafydd Hughes wrote: Sweet! Thanks Hans-Christoph! On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:36 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I manually

Re: [PD] Pd-0.40.3-extended-20080221-macosx104-i386.dmg

Sweet! Thanks again, Hans! Is this build compiled against Tcl/Tk 8.4.10? ~bsoisoi On Feb 22, 2008, at 3:33 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: I created another one, since I was using the old Tcl/Tk which causes crashed on Leopard. Also, the rsync wasn't automatically updating

Re: [PD] autobuilds using svn

AM, bsoisoi wrote: Hi David, Have you had any success installing all of pd-extended's dependencies? It appears a bug in Fink is preventing me from installing Jack and Flac. Let me know of your progress, we should collaborate and hopefully get this done quicker. Peace, ~Brandon On Feb

Re: [PD] autobuilds using svn

brand new, we can use this box until it croaks. It is not being used for anything else at the moment. Cheers, ~Brandon On Feb 14, 2008, at 7:05 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: No, there is no Intel Mac any more. The one that was being used got repurposed. bsoisoi is working on getting

Re: [PD] autobuilds using svn

AM, David Plans Casal wrote: ah, nevermind ;-) d On 15 Feb 2008, at 13:06, bsoisoi wrote: Hi Guys, I'll have the Pd-extended intel builds back online within the next week or so, assuming the few remaining dependencies can be built appropriately for 10.5 (flac and jack).I too am

Re: [PD] Jack OSX 0.75 Intel

Are you trying to run Jack on 10.4 or 10.5? On Jan 28, 2008, at 6:07 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Have you tried downgrading back to Jack .74 to see if it works again? Pd's Jack support on Mac OS X doesn't really have a maintainer, so there might be some issues with it. .hc On Jan

Re: [PD] vline~ question

I agree as well, prefer the existing vline message syntax. (I hope we haven't started a movement against the third value!) Now that I get it, it is much more intuitive than emulating an old 2 value breakpoint envelope. Has anyone made a vline-like external that only takes the first two

[PD] realtime linux + puredata

Hi guys, I don't normally keep up with linux kernel development, but apparently realtime support should have been fully built into 2.6.22 and up. I'm currently not (yet) a Linux user, so I can't check this for myself. I am curious if the Linux users on this board have found 2.6.22+ to

Re: [PD] vline~ question

Is there a reason for the third digit? The only possible advantage for the third digit it that I can imagine right now would be the ability to cut off previous messages prematurely w/o having to change the value of previous messages (besides testing my math skills). Am I missing

Re: [PD] Mac OS X Intel autobuilds

if it will be up again. hans? marius. bsoisoi wrote: Hello everyone, Is there a reason there hasn't been an autobuild for Mac OS X x86 since around 2007-12-07? Do we know when we can expect the Intel builds to resume? Thanks, ~Brandon ___ PD-list

[PD] Mac OS X Intel autobuilds

Hello everyone, Is there a reason there hasn't been an autobuild for Mac OS X x86 since around 2007-12-07? Do we know when we can expect the Intel builds to resume? Thanks, ~Brandon ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and

Re: [PD] performance on osX

Its PortAudio running through CoreAudio. If you use Jack on OS X, you'll see your % usage decrease significantly. I can easily cut my CPU usage in half by using Jack on OS X. I've also seen notable decreases when using cycling74's soundflower. On a similar note, if you happen to be using

[PD] Pd-0.40.3-extended and Pd-0.39.3-extended on 10.5 Leopard

Hey all, is anyone else having difficulties running either version of Pd- extended on OS X 10.5 Leopard? Whenever I hit the Help menu item, the whole program crashes. After this point, I am no longer able to save files, as the program will then crash upon save. I wouldn't be surprised

Re: [PD] Pd-0.40.3-extended and Pd-0.39.3-extended on 10.5 Leopard

soon! thanks On 16 Nov 2007, at 13:07, bsoisoi wrote: Hey all, is anyone else having difficulties running either version of Pd- extended on OS X 10.5 Leopard? Whenever I hit the Help menu item, the whole program crashes. After this point, I am no longer able to save files