Re: [PD] polygate~, demux~ mux~, mtx_*~
On Sam, 2013-07-27 at 18:08 -0400, pured...@11h11.com wrote: hi, i need to route 1 to x x to 1 audio signal. demux~ (demultiplex~ on pd-extended) and mux~ are doing exactly that, but when switching using a number box = glitch. polygate~ have a fade option that avoid this glitch but there's no couterpart (like unpolygate~) and finally mtx_*~ on pd-extended linux 64, i cannot create the object (i don't know what to import). [mtx_*~] is part of iemmatrix. And due to the way of how it is packaged in Pd-extended and due to some character restrictions for filenames, you need to use [hexloader] to load it. Try: [import hexloader iemmatrix] [mtx_*~] Roman ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
[PD] polygate~, demux~ mux~, mtx_*~
hi, i need to route 1 to x x to 1 audio signal. demux~ (demultiplex~ on pd-extended) and mux~ are doing exactly that, but when switching using a number box = glitch. polygate~ have a fade option that avoid this glitch but there's no couterpart (like unpolygate~) and finally mtx_*~ on pd-extended linux 64, i cannot create the object (i don't know what to import). any advice? ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] polygate~, demux~ mux~, mtx_*~
[mtx_*~] is part of the iemmatrix library. On Pd-extended on my mac I also can't create [mtx_*~], but [mtx_mul~] using [import iemmatrix]. I think [mtx_mul~] should be deprecated, but it works on Pd-extended-0.43 (I think, the latest version from puredata.info). On my Linux I have Pd-0.44.3 (vanilla) and I have compiled iemmatrix and I can create [mtx_*~]. Anyway, try it, this is the object for what you wanna do. On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 1:08 AM, pured...@11h11.com wrote: hi, i need to route 1 to x x to 1 audio signal. demux~ (demultiplex~ on pd-extended) and mux~ are doing exactly that, but when switching using a number box = glitch. polygate~ have a fade option that avoid this glitch but there's no couterpart (like unpolygate~) and finally mtx_*~ on pd-extended linux 64, i cannot create the object (i don't know what to import). any advice? __**_ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/** listinfo/pd-list http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] polygate~, demux~ mux~, mtx_*~
I would advise using mtx_mul~ instead of that. Also, I did an abstraction called matrixctrl some weeks ago that works just like its max/msp counterpart. Can't search for a link now, but you should be able to find it easily in the list archives. 2013/7/28 pured...@11h11.com hi, i need to route 1 to x x to 1 audio signal. demux~ (demultiplex~ on pd-extended) and mux~ are doing exactly that, but when switching using a number box = glitch. polygate~ have a fade option that avoid this glitch but there's no couterpart (like unpolygate~) and finally mtx_*~ on pd-extended linux 64, i cannot create the object (i don't know what to import). any advice? __**_ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/** listinfo/pd-list http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
