Re: [PD] >~ and <~ becommes _~ and __~ in windows...

2007-02-27 Thread Rich E
Side question, where do I find <~ and >~ sources? They are missing from some patches I downloaded and are hard to search for. Writing the name out, such as greaterthan~, seems a bit easier for everything... searching, compiling.. Regards, Rich On 2/27/07, IOhannes m zmoelnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [PD] >~ and <~ becommes _~ and __~ in windows...

2007-02-27 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Use the hex code for the ascii value of the non alphanumeric characters: ie. >~ = 0xe30x7e.pd That's how special cahrs are supported. .hc On Feb 27, 2007, at 10:28 PM, Thomas Jeppesen wrote: because windows want allow these characters: \, /, :, *, ?, ", >, < and | in a file name. what

Re: [PD] >~ and <~ becommes _~ and __~ in windows...

2007-02-27 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
Thomas Jeppesen wrote: > because windows want allow these characters: \, /, :, *, ?, ", >, < and > | in a file name. the solution is to use the hexloader-patch. (depending on your version of pd). see the archives for more information. fgmasd.r IOhannes __

Re: [PD] >~ and <~ becommes _~ and __~ in windows...

2007-02-27 Thread marius schebella
greaterthan, smallerthan. m. Thomas Jeppesen wrote: > because windows want allow these characters: \, /, :, *, ?, ", >, < and > | in a file name. > > what solution do you suggest to this "problem" besides medical surgery > of patches and "installing Linux" which is a whole different issue that

[PD] >~ and <~ becommes _~ and __~ in windows...

2007-02-27 Thread Thomas Jeppesen
because windows want allow these characters: \, /, :, *, ?, ", >, < and | in a file name. what solution do you suggest to this "problem" besides medical surgery of patches and "installing Linux" which is a whole different issue that I'll come back to in another post. Cheers! Thomas ___