في 2013/02/01، الساعة 7:57 م، كتب Max:
> I was wondering why the ligatures in the word الموسي (letters ل and م are
> joint) work in the second line of the text but in the first line they are
> written apart – or am I missing something?
It's only a question of calligraphy. In the beginning
Am 01.02.2013 um 20:09 schrieb Anas Ghrab :
> في 2013/02/01، الساعة 7:57 م، كتب Max:
>
>> I was wondering why the ligatures in the word الموسي (letters ل and م are
>> joint) work in the second line of the text but in the first line they are
>> written apart – or am I missing something?
>
>
Hi,
I was wondering why the ligatures in the word الموسي (letters ل and م are
joint) work in the second line of the text but in the first line they are
written apart – or am I missing something?
Unfortunately I think that's a very common problem that a 10 pt font in latin
is very readable but
The first problem is that you can't delete a character witch is not the last written character, because you can't place the cursor just after the wanted one. So it's impossible to edit the comment-text.Second, all is align at left : the text should be right-aligned (even in the canvas). An example
On 01/31/2013 09:19 PM, Anas Ghrab wrote:
Yes, good to know that...
Is the solution for the problem of the cursor technically known and difficult
to realize ?
no idea.
Pd currently manually sets the cursor to be on certain positions,
without being aware of RTL/LTR or multicharacter glyphs.
Yes, good to know that...
Is the solution for the problem of the cursor technically known and difficult
to realize ?
---
Anas
في 2013/01/31، الساعة 7:05 م، كتب Hans-Christoph Steiner:
> On 01/31/2013 10:29 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>> On 2013-01-22 22:31, IOhannes zmölnig wrote:
>>
On 01/31/2013 10:29 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> On 2013-01-22 22:31, IOhannes zmölnig wrote:
>
>> if PdX already knows how to do that, my afforts were probably futile.
>
>
> so i checked PdX and it turns out, that: - on linux, tcl/tk will output
> RTL-scripts as LTR; so the bidi-plugin is n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2013-01-22 22:31, IOhannes zmölnig wrote:
>
> if PdX already knows how to do that, my afforts were probably
> futile.
>
so i checked PdX and it turns out, that:
- - on linux, tcl/tk will output RTL-scripts as LTR; so the bidi-plugin
is needed her
On 01/22/2013 09:37 PM, Anas Ghrab wrote:
i didn't know that the BiDi-plugin comes with PdX (or did you install it
yourself?).
No, I didn't install anything else. Where can I download it, so I can try it ?
The arabic working is without any BiDi-plugin in PdX ? Parenthesis are in the
correct
Le Jan 22, 2013 à 8:55 PM, IOhannes zmölnig a écrit :
> On 01/22/2013 02:11 PM, Anas Ghrab wrote:
>> Le Jan 22, 2013 à 1:49 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
>>
>>> On 2013-01-22 12:32, Anas Ghrab wrote:
Thank you for the answer.
I downloaded again Pd-extended 0.43-4 (I think that
On 01/22/2013 02:11 PM, Anas Ghrab wrote:
Le Jan 22, 2013 à 1:49 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
On 2013-01-22 12:32, Anas Ghrab wrote:
Thank you for the answer.
I downloaded again Pd-extended 0.43-4 (I think that the one I had
was a beta one). The BiDi works :
which platform are you on?
Le Jan 22, 2013 à 1:49 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
> On 2013-01-22 12:32, Anas Ghrab wrote:
> > Thank you for the answer.
> >
> > I downloaded again Pd-extended 0.43-4 (I think that the one I had
> > was a beta one). The BiDi works :
>
> which platform are you on?
> which BiDi-support are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2013-01-22 12:32, Anas Ghrab wrote:
> Thank you for the answer.
>
> I downloaded again Pd-extended 0.43-4 (I think that the one I had
> was a beta one). The BiDi works :
which platform are you on?
which BiDi-support are you referring to? Gem (whic
Thank you for the answer.
I downloaded again Pd-extended 0.43-4 (I think that the one I had was a beta
one). The BiDi works :
- I get the arabic text without problem
- The parenthesis are in the good direction
But :
- The cursor is on the right; it should be at left. It is problematic now to
So the release is not released ? :o)
http://puredata.info/downloads/bidi-plugin/releases/0.1
---
Anas
Le Jan 21, 2013 à 9:43 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
> On 2013-01-21 21:07, Anas Ghrab wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The BiDi-plugin is aborted ?
>
> no.
>
> fdasfrt
> IOhannes
signature.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2013-01-22 11:45, Anas Ghrab wrote:
> By the way... I'm using Pd-extended 0.43-4.
>
> --- Anas
>
> Le Jan 22, 2013 à 11:37 AM, Anas Ghrab a écrit :
>
>> So the release is not released ? :o)
>> http://puredata.info/downloads/bidi-plugin/releases/
By the way... I'm using Pd-extended 0.43-4.
---
Anas
Le Jan 22, 2013 à 11:37 AM, Anas Ghrab a écrit :
> So the release is not released ? :o)
> http://puredata.info/downloads/bidi-plugin/releases/0.1
>
> ---
> Anas
>
> Le Jan 21, 2013 à 9:43 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
>
>> On 2013-01-21
So the release is not released ? :o)
http://puredata.info/downloads/bidi-plugin/releases/0.1
---
Anas
Le Jan 21, 2013 à 9:43 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
> On 2013-01-21 21:07, Anas Ghrab wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The BiDi-plugin is aborted ?
>
> no.
>
> fdasfrt
> IOhannes
signature.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2013-01-21 21:07, Anas Ghrab wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The BiDi-plugin is aborted ?
no.
fdasfrt
IOhannes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAlD9
Hi all,
The BiDi-plugin is aborted ?
Yours,
---
Anas Ghrab
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
20 matches
Mail list logo
