Re: [PD] Building Pd-extended on arch linux 64

2013-01-25 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On 01/25/2013 06:39 PM, Fero Kiraly wrote: PKGBUILD script contains: https://pure-data.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/pure-data/branches/pd-extended/0.43 and clone git:// pure-data.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/pure-data/pd-extended.git is this correct ? Everything is now in the SVN, no git

Re: [PD] building pd-extended on Raspberry Pi

2012-06-07 Thread Tedb0t
Following up on this—after a few more resolved dependencies I finally got everything to build. Haven't gotten a chance to actually *test* it yet, but I will find out soon ;) ;) I'd still like to understand, though, how this is supposed to work. Is there a list of miscellaneous dependencies

[PD] building pd-extended on Raspberry Pi

2012-06-06 Thread Tedb0t
Hi all, I'm presently neck-deep in building Pd-extended on my Raspberry Pi (debian squeeze). I'm running into a lot of dependency problems. Here's what I did to prepare for the build: rsync -av --delete rsync://128.238.56.50/distros/pd-extended/ pd-extended/ added to /etc/apt/sources.list:

Re: [PD] building pd-extended from svn trunk

2011-02-17 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Um, hehe, yeah, I should start pushing updates from the pd- extended.git to the SVN, so that one SVN checkout will actually build when we're between releases. I'd use rsync: http://puredata.info/docs/developer/GettingPdSource .hc On Feb 16, 2011, at 1:22 PM, Pedro Lopes wrote:

[PD] building pd-extended from svn trunk

2011-02-16 Thread martin.peach
I'm trying to build pd-extended from svn trunk. I'm following the text here: http://puredata.info/docs/developer/BuildingPdExtended So I do this: cd pure-data/packages/linux_make make install ...and the build ends in pd/src: dbtopow~.c:5:20: error: e_sqrt.h: No such file or directory. It's

Re: [PD] building pd-extended from svn trunk

2011-02-16 Thread Pedro Lopes
pedro@io:~$ locate e_sqrt.h /home/pedro/Apps/pdfont/pdextendedAll/0.42/externals/vanilla/e_sqrt.h /home/pedro/Apps/pdfont/pdextendedAll/0.42/externals/vanilla/.svn/text-base/e_sqrt.h.svn-base On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 6:15 PM, martin.pe...@sympatico.ca wrote: e_sqrt.h -- Pedro Lopes (MSc)

[PD] building pd-extended from SVN

2010-12-02 Thread Ivica Ico Bukvic
Hans, I've tried building entire pd-extended tree from SVN according to the instructions found in the packages/linux_make/README and I got stuck on an error. scripts/checkout-developer-layout.sh (downloaded everything into pure-data folder) cd pure-data/packages/linux_make make install It

Re: [PD] building pd-extended from SVN

2010-12-02 Thread Ivica Ico Bukvic
FYI, Ended-up touching fake help-files to get through this one--this definitely looks like a build script bug. Now that the whole tarball is successfully built, main tarball installer (the one that is packaged with the tarball, fails with an error when it tries to install $n-help.pd file from the

Re: [PD] building pd-extended from SVN

2010-12-02 Thread Ivica Ico Bukvic
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 23:04 -0500, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote: FYI, Ended-up touching fake help-files to get through this one--this definitely looks like a build script bug. Now that the whole tarball is successfully built, main tarball installer (the one that is packaged with the tarball,

Re: [PD] building pd-extended from SVN

2010-12-02 Thread Ivica Ico Bukvic
Never mind, found out that a double $$ does it. Hans, this appears to be another build script error. Thanks! Ico ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] building pd-extended from SVN

2010-12-02 Thread Ivica Ico Bukvic
More errors: toxy flatspace flib never get built using this process for whatever reason. Ico ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

[PD] building pd-extended fedora 64bit

2010-07-25 Thread Bernardo Barros
Hi, I can`t get this packages to build the pd-extended (rc) for fedora 13 64bit. What is the easy way to get them? No package libquicktime available. No package libquicktime-devel available. No package faad2 available. No package faac available. No package ffmpeg-libs available. No package

Re: [PD] building pd-extended fedora 64bit

2010-07-25 Thread András Murányi
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Bernardo Barros bernardobarr...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, I can`t get this packages to build the pd-extended (rc) for fedora 13 64bit. What is the easy way to get them? No package libquicktime available. No package libquicktime-devel available. No package faad2

[PD] Building Pd-extended 64 bit OS X

2010-06-10 Thread Dafydd Hughes
Hi folks Any advice on building a 64 bit version of Pd-extended? I've started by following the instructions here http://puredata.info/docs/developer/MacOSXFink but it looks like Fink is unable to find several libraries. (I've removed them from the install command and I'll let Fink install the

Re: [PD] Building Pd-extended 64 bit OS X

2010-06-10 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Wow, you are an intrepid Pd user, wanting to get into the hard build problems. I haven't even made a build on 64-bit/10.6 yet. Here are some things off the top of my head: - Gem won't build on 10.6/64-bit since some of the Carbon APIs are not 64-bit. In packages/Makefile, you'll need

Re: [PD] Building Pd-extended 64 bit OS X

2010-06-10 Thread Dafydd Hughes
Thanks Hans-Christoph Actually, not so much intrepid as procrastinating. I had trouble yesterday getting Pd-py-mysql working and found that all 3 have to be either 32 or 64 bit. Right now 32-bit works fine, and I can't see why I'd need 64 for what I'm doing, so I might just stop here:) Let's

Re: [PD] Building Pd-extended 64 bit OS X

2010-06-10 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
I just tried a build, looks like you need to remove 'hid' and 'pidip' from the LIB_TARGETS to get things to build. Also, I don't think Pd-extended 0.42.5 will work with Tcl/Tk newer than 8.4 0.43 does. That means if building on 10.6, you'll probably having to use a manually installed

Re: [PD] Building Pd-extended 64 bit OS X

2010-06-10 Thread Dafydd Hughes
Well, if I'm going this far, why not manually build Tcl/Tk? I really should be doing _work_. On 2010-06-10, at 12:41 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: I just tried a build, looks like you need to remove 'hid' and 'pidip' from the LIB_TARGETS to get things to build. Also, I don't think

Re: [PD] Building Pd-extended 64 bit OS X

2010-06-10 Thread Dafydd Hughes
Ha! Thanks Hans-Christoph! I'll have a look. On 2010-06-10, at 3:20 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Well, since I think you should be working, I tried myself and wrote up some notes, maybe that will get you back to work sooner rather than later ;)

Re: [PD] Building Pd-extended 64 bit OS X

2010-06-10 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Well, since I think you should be working, I tried myself and wrote up some notes, maybe that will get you back to work sooner rather than later ;) http://puredata.info/docs/developer/MacOSX64BitBuilds Please add your experience to it. .hc On Jun 10, 2010, at 12:43 PM, Dafydd Hughes

Re: [PD] Building PD-extended

2009-08-09 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Ok, I fixed this issue and committed it to SVN. So you should be able to run the 0.41.4 autobuild on more machines. I just ran a successful build on Ubuntu Netbook Remix Jaunty, which I'll be posting soon. .hc el jay wrote: yes i have tried this.. buit then when i try to build with

Re: [PD] Building PD-extended

2009-07-28 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Yeah, I've seen this two on my jaunty netbook remix netbook. Strange, since the nighlty builds on many machines worked fine. I guess there is something different in the setup of those machines. I'll look when I get a chance. .hc el jay wrote: yes i have tried this.. buit then when i

[PD] Building PD-extended

2009-07-27 Thread danomatika
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 04:18 +0200, pd-list-requ...@iem.at wrote: hello pd'people! i am trying to install Pd.extened-41.4 on a debian64 sid (unstable) kernel 2.6.30- i have been looking around and the option of installing 32bit with ia32lbs an ---force-architecture gave me

Re: [PD] Building PD-extended

2009-07-27 Thread el jay
yes i have tried this.. buit then when i try to build with fakeroot dpkg-deb --build build/ Pd-0.40.3-extended.deb i get given the same error.. and if i touch around some more then i am told that package name was expected but is missing or garabe found 2009/7/27 danomatika

[PD] Building PD-extended

2009-07-26 Thread fotorebelion
hello pd'people! i am trying to install Pd.extened-41.4 on a debian64 sid (unstable) kernel 2.6.30- i have been looking around and the option of installing 32bit with ia32lbs an ---force-architecture gave me libsasound2 problems.. so i found a tutorial that explain how two build from

Re: [PD] building Pd-extended on 64 bit debian system

2008-12-10 Thread Ilias Anagnostopoulos
: John Harrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PD] building Pd-extended on 64 bit Debian system To: pd-list pd-list@iem.at Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed For those of us working outside the realm of Pd vanilla, I am a big supporter of Pd

Re: [PD] building Pd-extended on 64 bit Debian system

2008-12-10 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
While you may think it was stupid to install 64-bit now, I am very glad you did. That's how we are going to get the 64-bit builds working well, by people installing 64-bit, using it, reporting bugs, and fixing them. I think that with pd 0.41, we are very close to getting the whole

Re: [PD] building Pd-extended on 64 bit Debian system

2008-12-10 Thread Erik Garrison
On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 06:03:39PM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: While you may think it was stupid to install 64-bit now, I am very glad you did. That's how we are going to get the 64-bit builds working well, by people installing 64-bit, using it, reporting bugs, and fixing

[PD] building Pd-extended on 64 bit Debian system

2008-12-09 Thread John Harrison
For those of us working outside the realm of Pd vanilla, I am a big supporter of Pd-extended because it gets us using the same versions of the same sets of modules. This combined with its binary distributions gets us all able to focus more on our work and less on silly configuration issues