On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.cawrote:
On Tue, 18 May 2010, Martin Peach wrote:
chris clepper wrote:
Unfortunately, DSP compression is absolutely horrid compared to analog
boxes like an API 2500 or ADR Compex - let alone the old tube gear like a
176.
There's also +compand~ from the port of Tom Erbe's soundhack VST plug-ins:
http://www.soundhack.com/externs.php
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Alexandre Porres por...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, anyone know of any good patches or objects for compression in Pd?
thanks
Hi, anyone know of any good patches or objects for compression in Pd?
thanks
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Hi
On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 02:57 -0400, Alexandre Porres wrote:
Hi, anyone know of any good patches or objects for compression in Pd?
thanks
zexy comes with [limiter~]
I also tried to implement a compressor as an abstraction. You can either
download it here http://www.netpd.org/Dynlib (rcomp)
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 5:54 AM, Roman Haefeli reduzie...@yahoo.de wrote:
P.S.: @pdmtl guys
It's plain wrong to have a wet/dry parameter for dynamic processing fx.
It just doesn't make sense at all to have the compressor output mixed
with the input signal (It not only doesn't make sense, it
On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 07:28 -0400, chris clepper wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 5:54 AM, Roman Haefeli reduzie...@yahoo.de
wrote:
P.S.: @pdmtl guys
It's plain wrong to have a wet/dry parameter for dynamic
processing fx.
It just doesn't make sense at
I made a saturator compressor (a non linear compressor) a few years ago
http://puredata.info/Members/saturno/saturator-non-linear-compressor
http://puredata.info/Members/saturno/saturator.zip/view
It's an external.
Paulo
On 18/05/2010 10:28, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 07:28
On 18 May 2010 14:28, Roman Haefeli reduzie...@yahoo.de wrote:
On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 07:28 -0400, chris clepper wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 5:54 AM, Roman Haefeli reduzie...@yahoo.de
wrote:
It just doesn't make sense at all to have the compressor
output mixed
with
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:21:53AM -0300, Paulo Casaes wrote:
I made a saturator compressor (a non linear compressor) a few years ago
http://puredata.info/Members/saturno/saturator-non-linear-compressor
http://puredata.info/Members/saturno/saturator.zip/view
It's an external.
And to add
Roman
P.S.: @pdmtl guys
It's plain wrong to have a wet/dry parameter for dynamic processing fx.
It just doesn't make sense at all to have the compressor output mixed
with the input signal (It not only doesn't make sense, it even adds
strange phasing effects, if the the dynamic processor uses a
On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 11:12 -0400, patrick wrote:
Roman
P.S.: @pdmtl guys
It's plain wrong to have a wet/dry parameter for dynamic processing fx.
It just doesn't make sense at all to have the compressor output mixed
with the input signal (It not only doesn't make sense, it even adds
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:01 AM, mark hadman markhad...@googlemail.comwrote:
That aside, there's a much easier way to preserve transients - just
slow down the compressor's attack time
This is still quite different than parallel compression. One can have fast
attack times with high
chris clepper wrote:
Unfortunately, DSP compression is absolutely horrid compared to analog
boxes like an API 2500 or ADR Compex - let alone the old tube gear like
a 176.
Why do you think that is? What is missing in the digital version?
Martin
On Tue, 18 May 2010, Martin Peach wrote:
chris clepper wrote:
Unfortunately, DSP compression is absolutely horrid compared to analog
boxes like an API 2500 or ADR Compex - let alone the old tube gear like a
176.
Why do you think that is? What is missing in the digital version?
the digital
14 matches
Mail list logo
