Hallo,
David Powers hat gesagt: // David Powers wrote:
I'm wondering if I should use something like PyExt to do some of the
mapping, as I don't know of any simple way to do hash dictionaries in
PD itself. As a test last night, I built a simple abstraction to take
notes C C# D etc. and output
Hi all,
This is a very interesting discussion, I have been thinking of
generating directives/instructions/scores (mostly in that order) for
performers (definitely in the context of improvised music) but had not
(yet?) got around to implementing anything. One thing that I did
consider, though,
Hello,
I have a question, how hard do you think it would be create a notation
engine for GEM? What considerations would go into the design?
On the simplest level, I'm imagining doing non-rhythmic notation to
display chords and cells for improvisors.
Since the number of notes on a chord would be
This sounds interesting, I will take a look at it when I get out of work...
As far as what improvisors need, I'm working in the more
'experimental' improv scene right now, which means:
1. They won't be playing 'Cmajor7' but rather collections of pitch
cells such as (0 3 5 1 2 4) in some specific
David Powers a écrit :
This sounds interesting, I will take a look at it when I get out of work...
As far as what improvisors need, I'm working in the more
'experimental' improv scene right now, which means:
1. They won't be playing 'Cmajor7' but rather collections of pitch
cells such as (0
1. (0 3 5 1 2 4) might make sense for an engineer because zero for him would
be the first note,
but a musician uses to start with one, not zero. If this notation is for
expressing some voicings,
that is a lot easier and free to read under jazz notation for a human,
unless the numbers
Okay, I guess I need to check out the pdmtl stuff, I don't have
pd2ascii and ascii2pd but it definitely looks useful. (It took me a
second to realize you wrote a note explaining where pd2ascii was from,
I thought my pd-ext was missing something at first...) In fact, I
definitely better revisit
David Powers a écrit :
1. (0 3 5 1 2 4) might make sense for an engineer because zero for him would
be the first note,
but a musician uses to start with one, not zero. If this notation is for
expressing some voicings,
that is a lot easier and free to read under jazz notation for a human,
Just remember I've made an abstraction for that long ago, it won't be as
fast as DS but it works and it's attached
patrice colet a écrit :
David Powers a écrit :
1. (0 3 5 1 2 4) might make sense for an engineer because zero for him would
be the first note,
but a musician uses to start
Hi David list,
I did a project at Stanford/ccrma, for which my pal Rob designed a
system that used Lilypond to display the output of a patch, and that
worked beautifully, from the performer's (my) point of view. Here's a
link to his paper, see section 2.7.
10 matches
Mail list logo
