On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com wrote:
Without knowing anything in advance about the speakers being used, is there a
way to construct some kind of [aural-faxbomb~] that outputs in the -1 to 1
range which could be used generally to at least get in the
- Original Message -
From: Charles Henry czhe...@gmail.com
To: Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com; pd-list@iem.at
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 12:22 PM
Subject: Re: [PD] Headphones question on pd list
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011, Jonathan Wilkes wrote (outside of pd-list):
If I do this, can't I be fairly certain that I won't get a sound with
greater perceived volume than the clipped [noise~]--[*~ 99] that I
started with? [...] I'm just talking about things that could potentially
cause ear
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.cawrote:
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011, Jonathan Wilkes wrote (outside of pd-list):
If I do this, can't I be fairly certain that I won't get a sound with
greater perceived volume than the clipped [noise~]--[*~ 99] that I
started
@iem.at
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 4:09 PM
Subject: Re: [PD] Headphones question on pd list
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca wrote:
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011, Jonathan Wilkes wrote (outside of pd-list):
If I do this, can't I be fairly certain that I won't get
