Re: [PD] Linux, video1394 support?

2010-05-12 Thread Michal Seta
Just for the record. The performance is not that bad, I made a mistake, something else in the pd patch was consuming lots of cycles. Coriander tends to be CPU hungry and apparently I need to have display window open in order for it to schlep data over loopback. Displaying only a few frames a seco

Re: [PD] Linux, video1394 support?

2010-05-11 Thread Michal Seta
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:08 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > you should be able to pipe the data > from coriander into Gem, using a vloopback device. I did that but performance is rather unacceptable. I guess I will go that route if everything else fails. Thanks ./MiS __

Re: [PD] Linux, video1394 support?

2010-05-11 Thread Michal Seta
So, nope, no go for me. [pdp_ieee1394] fails with initializing: Inappropriate ioctl for device It is the same message I get with [pix_video] Any other leads? 2010/5/11 Michal Seta : > 2010/5/11 John Harrison : >> so [pdp_ieee1394] isn't working? From there you could use [pix_2gem] > > > Thanks

Re: [PD] Linux, video1394 support?

2010-05-11 Thread Michal Seta
2010/5/11 John Harrison : > so [pdp_ieee1394] isn't working? From there you could use [pix_2gem] Thanks for the tip. I will try it tonight. ./MiS ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listin

Re: [PD] Linux, video1394 support?

2010-05-11 Thread András Murányi
2010/5/11 IOhannes m zmoelnig > On 2010-05-11 16:29, András Murányi wrote: > > >> the "dv" backend in pix_video refers to camcorder's (those ieee1394 > >> cameras that don't work with coriander); it doesn't work with the new > >> juju stack, however (found in recent linux kernels; most distributi

Re: [PD] Linux, video1394 support?

2010-05-11 Thread John Harrison
n...@iem.at [mailto:pd-list-boun...@iem.at] On Behalf Of > IOhannes m zmoelnig > Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 10:42 AM > To: John Harrison > Cc: PD List > Subject: Re: [PD] Linux, video1394 support? > > [On 2010-05-11 16:38, John Harrison wrote: > > so [pdp_ieee1

Re: [PD] Linux, video1394 support?

2010-05-11 Thread Pagano, Patrick
http://artefacte.org/pd/ it's here though! pp -Original Message- From: pd-list-boun...@iem.at [mailto:pd-list-boun...@iem.at] On Behalf Of Pagano, Patrick Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 10:45 AM To: IOhannes m zmoelnig; John Harrison Cc: PD List Subject: Re: [PD] Linux, video1394 su

Re: [PD] Linux, video1394 support?

2010-05-11 Thread Pagano, Patrick
pdp_ieee1394 was originally for OSX and is not in all pd-extended(s) for linux pp -Original Message- From: pd-list-boun...@iem.at [mailto:pd-list-boun...@iem.at] On Behalf Of IOhannes m zmoelnig Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 10:42 AM To: John Harrison Cc: PD List Subject: Re: [PD] Linux

Re: [PD] Linux, video1394 support?

2010-05-11 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
[On 2010-05-11 16:38, John Harrison wrote: > so [pdp_ieee1394] isn't working? From there you could use [pix_2gem] > afaik, [pdp_ieee1394] is a pdp-clone of the videoDV backend of Gem; everything that applies to Gem's "dv" support should also apply to [pdp_ieee1394]. my information might be outda

Re: [PD] Linux, video1394 support?

2010-05-11 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-05-11 16:29, András Murányi wrote: >> the "dv" backend in pix_video refers to camcorder's (those ieee1394 >> cameras that don't work with coriander); it doesn't work with the new >> juju stack, however (found in recent linux kernels; most distributions >> seem to only ship this new stack :

Re: [PD] Linux, video1394 support?

2010-05-11 Thread John Harrison
so [pdp_ieee1394] isn't working? From there you could use [pix_2gem] 2010/5/11 András Murányi > > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 4:08 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > >> On 2010-05-11 15:54, Michal Seta wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > I have been trying to get a Point Grey Firefly (firewire) camera >> >

Re: [PD] Linux, video1394 support?

2010-05-11 Thread András Murányi
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 4:08 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > On 2010-05-11 15:54, Michal Seta wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have been trying to get a Point Grey Firefly (firewire) camera > > working in Linux (Karmic). It works fine with ReactiVision and > > coriander (the only 2 apps I tried). In

Re: [PD] Linux, video1394 support?

2010-05-11 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-05-11 15:54, Michal Seta wrote: > Hello, > > I have been trying to get a Point Grey Firefly (firewire) camera > working in Linux (Karmic). It works fine with ReactiVision and > coriander (the only 2 apps I tried). In pd, I was preferring > [pix_video] but neither v4l2 driver nor dv1394 w

[PD] Linux, video1394 support?

2010-05-11 Thread Michal Seta
Hello, I have been trying to get a Point Grey Firefly (firewire) camera working in Linux (Karmic). It works fine with ReactiVision and coriander (the only 2 apps I tried). In pd, I was preferring [pix_video] but neither v4l2 driver nor dv1394 works (I believe this is a dc camera). Does anyone h