Re: [PD] Pd-list Digest, Vol 55, Issue 120

2009-11-04 Thread Dan Wilcox


On Nov 4, 2009, at 4:20 PM, dmotd wrote:


oh come now, i really commiserate with a
bad work situation, but i have a hard
time really sympathising with anyone
taking on work from a large arts
beurocracy. it is often the case that
you leave your passion at the door - and
i have found that there are many people
with less a commitment to creation and
creativity that fulfill these rolls far
better than artists do.

- sorry dan, its awful working somewhere
 you hate, but i'm sure there are many
 folks that could fill your shoes.

to say that there is a future making a
certain artwork is as vague as
suggesting that an invention is
commercially viable. if you *have* to
make artwork, then you probably will,
outside of economic imperative, and its
more than likely you will pay for its
existence and continued existence
thereafter.

but if you are prepared to forgo the
creative challenges and use skills in
ways that make you employable. then
there are a number of ways to do so, and
most likely there are many small
creative organisations in your area that
require someone with both creative and
technical talent - and more often than
not their application of your talents
will challenge and push you into areas
you are not currently aware.

and besides if you have the right
personality type and the essense of some
talent than there's a good chance you
will get all accesses to the inner
sanctum of 'art'. just don't hold your
breath.

all i'd like really like to say on this
topic is keep an open mind and strong
focus on quality work, you may never
support yourself financially but you
will become a stronger artist for it.

i don't usually make an effort to
respond to social agenda - hopefully
this is a rarity.



You're totally right .. that's why I'm pretty much done at this  
point.  I feel stupid for complaining about it really, but the  
question was asked and I felt like sharing my current situation.   
There is a definite difference between the artists and the engineers  
that work at these places.  For most, it's just a job.  I can't really  
see things like that and it's hard not to invest energy I probably  
don't need to.


I too agree that you'll make better art by the skin of your teeth then  
in the comfy confines of academia / commercial work.  It's definitely  
time to focus on quality work .. hell, I just want to be able to focus  
on my own work at all.



Daniel Wilcox wrote:



On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 2:23 PM,  wrote:


   -- Forwarded message --
   From: "Jo o Pais" 
   To: "Adityo Pratomo" , PDlist >

   Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:27:33 +0100
   Subject: Re: [PD] life as a new media artist
   Hi,

   I suggest you keep your day job maintaing networks. it's much  
more well
   paid than art jobs, which means that you can work less and have  
more time
   for you. plus, the frustration of not being involved in art  
gives you
   energy to sit down and work on your things when you finally  
manage it. you
   don't waste those artistic thoughts somewhere else, like  
producing a

   concert or something.
   Unless you've already good well-known in the field, and are able  
to get a

   "regular" amount of paid comissions/projects done.



I an second that statement.

I'm working for Ars Electronica right now and I've basically  
discovered that

working in the field blows.  My energy has been wasted on boring
commercial-oriented stuff and I don't have any energy for my own  
work ... I
wish I was delivering chinese food again.  Plus the network admin  
job probably

pays far better then mine. *sigh*



   I make a living mainly as an engraver for scores (classical/ 
modern/film
   music). it's not very well paid, but I can maintain my lifestyle  
for the
   time being (single guy sharing a flat with no family), and now  
and then buy
   equipment. although in the future I'll have a lousy pension for  
sure.


   Jo o Pais


   Hmm, I see. Looks like we have to have a day job right? Just  
curious,

   is
   there anyone have a day job in a field that has no relation  
with art?

   Like
   for example, I myself, I work as a network consultant. And  
then use my

   spare
   time to do some art stuff.



--
Dan Wilcox
danomatika
www.robotcowboy.com



___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list





Dan Wilcox
danomatika.com
robotcowboy.com




___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] Pd-list Digest, Vol 55, Issue 120

2009-11-04 Thread dmotd
oh come now, i really commiserate with a
bad work situation, but i have a hard
time really sympathising with anyone
taking on work from a large arts
beurocracy. it is often the case that
you leave your passion at the door - and
i have found that there are many people
with less a commitment to creation and
creativity that fulfill these rolls far
better than artists do. 

- sorry dan, its awful working somewhere
  you hate, but i'm sure there are many 
  folks that could fill your shoes.

to say that there is a future making a
certain artwork is as vague as
suggesting that an invention is
commercially viable. if you *have* to
make artwork, then you probably will,
outside of economic imperative, and its
more than likely you will pay for its
existence and continued existence
thereafter.

but if you are prepared to forgo the
creative challenges and use skills in
ways that make you employable. then
there are a number of ways to do so, and
most likely there are many small
creative organisations in your area that
require someone with both creative and
technical talent - and more often than
not their application of your talents
will challenge and push you into areas
you are not currently aware.

and besides if you have the right
personality type and the essense of some
talent than there's a good chance you
will get all accesses to the inner
sanctum of 'art'. just don't hold your
breath.

all i'd like really like to say on this
topic is keep an open mind and strong
focus on quality work, you may never
support yourself financially but you
will become a stronger artist for it.

i don't usually make an effort to
respond to social agenda - hopefully
this is a rarity.

Daniel Wilcox wrote:
> 
> 
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 2:23 PM,  wrote:
> 
> 
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: "Jo o Pais" 
> To: "Adityo Pratomo" , PDlist 
> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:27:33 +0100
> Subject: Re: [PD] life as a new media artist
> Hi,
> 
> I suggest you keep your day job maintaing networks. it's much more well
> paid than art jobs, which means that you can work less and have more time
> for you. plus, the frustration of not being involved in art gives you
> energy to sit down and work on your things when you finally manage it. you
> don't waste those artistic thoughts somewhere else, like producing a
> concert or something.
> Unless you've already good well-known in the field, and are able to get a
> "regular" amount of paid comissions/projects done.
>  
> 
> 
> I an second that statement.
> 
> I'm working for Ars Electronica right now and I've basically discovered that
> working in the field blows.  My energy has been wasted on boring
> commercial-oriented stuff and I don't have any energy for my own work ... I
> wish I was delivering chinese food again.  Plus the network admin job probably
> pays far better then mine. *sigh*
> 
>  
> 
> I make a living mainly as an engraver for scores (classical/modern/film
> music). it's not very well paid, but I can maintain my lifestyle for the
> time being (single guy sharing a flat with no family), and now and then 
> buy
> equipment. although in the future I'll have a lousy pension for sure.
> 
> Jo o Pais
> 
> 
> Hmm, I see. Looks like we have to have a day job right? Just curious,
> is
> there anyone have a day job in a field that has no relation with art?
> Like
> for example, I myself, I work as a network consultant. And then use my
> spare
> time to do some art stuff.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Dan Wilcox
> danomatika
> www.robotcowboy.com

> ___
> Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] Pd-list Digest, Vol 55, Issue 120

2009-11-04 Thread João Pais

I suggest you keep your day job maintaing networks. it's much more well
paid than art jobs, which means that you can work less and have more  
time

for you. plus, the frustration of not being involved in art gives you
energy to sit down and work on your things when you finally manage it.  
you
don't waste those artistic thoughts somewhere else, like producing a  
concert

or something.
Unless you've already good well-known in the field, and are able to get  
a

"regular" amount of paid comissions/projects done.




I an second that statement.

I'm working for Ars Electronica right now and I've basically discovered  
that

working in the field blows.  My energy has been wasted on boring
commercial-oriented stuff and I don't have any energy for my own work  
... I

wish I was delivering chinese food again.  Plus the network admin job
probably pays far better then mine. *sigh*


afaik, ars electronica isn't exactly the best-paying place in the world.  
but look on the good side, you might learn enough experience when you  
decide not to renew your contract, like many do. just leave as soon as you  
can.


[did we met in July in Linz? I'm a friend of Enrique Tomás, I was there to  
work with him on a performance of our trio.]


João Pais

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] Pd-list Digest, Vol 55, Issue 120

2009-11-04 Thread Daniel Wilcox
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 2:23 PM,  wrote:

>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: "João Pais" 
> To: "Adityo Pratomo" , PDlist 
> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:27:33 +0100
> Subject: Re: [PD] life as a new media artist
> Hi,
>
> I suggest you keep your day job maintaing networks. it's much more well
> paid than art jobs, which means that you can work less and have more time
> for you. plus, the frustration of not being involved in art gives you
> energy to sit down and work on your things when you finally manage it. you
> don't waste those artistic thoughts somewhere else, like producing a concert
> or something.
> Unless you've already good well-known in the field, and are able to get a
> "regular" amount of paid comissions/projects done.
>


I an second that statement.

I'm working for Ars Electronica right now and I've basically discovered that
working in the field blows.  My energy has been wasted on boring
commercial-oriented stuff and I don't have any energy for my own work ... I
wish I was delivering chinese food again.  Plus the network admin job
probably pays far better then mine. *sigh*



> I make a living mainly as an engraver for scores (classical/modern/film
> music). it's not very well paid, but I can maintain my lifestyle for the
> time being (single guy sharing a flat with no family), and now and then buy
> equipment. although in the future I'll have a lousy pension for sure.
>
> João Pais
>
>  Hmm, I see. Looks like we have to have a day job right? Just curious, is
>> there anyone have a day job in a field that has no relation with art? Like
>> for example, I myself, I work as a network consultant. And then use my
>> spare
>> time to do some art stuff.
>>
>

-- 
Dan Wilcox
danomatika
www.robotcowboy.com
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list