From: Mathieu Bouchard matju at artengine.ca
Subject: Re: Question about object categorizing
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.multimedia.puredata.general
Date: 2009-09-26 03:57:19 GMT (14 weeks, 5 days, 14 hours and 24 minutes ago)
[...]
So basically the category system has more to do with social factors
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009, András Murányi wrote:
There is still some good in this world as categories 1.) are an optional
startup plugin (and believe me there will be more startup plugins to
piss you off, that's why they are optional)
yeah, exactly :)
it would definitely solve some social
On Sun, 27 Sep 2009, PSPunch wrote:
If by any chance someone can explain the historical background, I think I and
others as well would be interested in learning..
The historical background of... what? The classification used in Pd
itself?
_ _ __ ___ _ _
Just move the relevant objects to whatever category you think they
belong, or reorganize the entire thing and change the categories. Then
put it in the patch tracker on sourceforge.
I've attached a reformatted version of the intro patch, if you want to
use it as a template. I added
No, I know exactly what the relevancy is, I just don't enjoy it. First, a
person tells himself/herself «it would be better if there were
categories». Then the person looks for characteristic features of the
elements to be categorised, so that categories can be made. Those
features
have to be
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009, João Pais wrote:
Those features have to be easy to think about. Turns out that one of
the easiest features to think about in this case, are things like:
where you first learned the basic concept of each object class.
yes, that's a very good example of category-building. if
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009, PSPunch wrote:
Perhaps I should have made clear that I was not sure how [print~] and
[samphold~] would even be considered to go under filters.
No, no, you were clear enough, I just meant that those aren't the only
things that don't fit where they've been put, and that
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.cawrote:
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009, João Pais wrote:
Those features have to be easy to think about. Turns out that one of the
easiest features to think about in this case, are things like: where you
first learned the basic concept
Hi all,
A quick question regarding,
pd/doc/5.reference/intro-help.pd
I was wondering why [print~] and [samphold~] are under AUDIO FILTERS.
Are they meant to belong there?
--
David Shimamoto
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009, PSPunch wrote:
Hi all,
A quick question regarding,
pd/doc/5.reference/intro-help.pd
I was wondering why [print~] and [samphold~] are under AUDIO FILTERS.
Are they meant to belong there?
They are meant to remind everybody that categories don't necessarily make
any sense.
Hi Mathieu,
Hi all,
A quick question regarding,
pd/doc/5.reference/intro-help.pd
I was wondering why [print~] and [samphold~] are under AUDIO FILTERS.
Are they meant to belong there?
They are meant to remind everybody that categories don't necessarily
make any sense.
I'd also ask what's
--- On Sat, 9/26/09, PSPunch sh...@pspunch.com wrote:
From: PSPunch sh...@pspunch.com
Subject: Re: [PD] Question about object categorizing
To: Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca
Cc: PD list pd-list@iem.at
Date: Saturday, September 26, 2009, 1:55 AM
Hi Mathieu,
Hi all,
A quick
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009, PSPunch wrote:
Hi Mathieu,
I'd also ask what's the logic in not putting all the AUDIO FILTERS object
classes in the AUDIO MATH section, and/or in not putting all the AUDIO MATH
classes in the AUDIO FILTERS section. But I don't expect an answer at all.
May I take it that
Hi Mathieu,
Thank you for sharing your thoughts.
I fully understand what you find unpleasant with categorization in general.
Perhaps I should have made clear that I was not sure how [print~] and
[samphold~] would even be considered to go under filters.
Following your example, I figure
14 matches
Mail list logo
