Re: [PD] Sinesum, cosinesum and cubic interpolation's guard points

2013-09-05 Thread Alexandros Drymonitis
OK, that's clear, thanks. Still when using [tabread4~] or [tabosc4~] you still need a copy of the last element in the first index and copies of the first two elements in the last two indices, right? Even if you're not using sinesum or cosinesum but some other mathematical function.. On Thu, Sep 5

Re: [PD] Sinesum, cosinesum and cubic interpolation's guard points

2013-09-05 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-09-05 09:45, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote: > OK, index 0 is the negative of index 2, no not really, they just happen to be the same. > which can again make sense as it's a sine (supposing that index 0 > is a copy of the table's last element),

[PD] Sinesum, cosinesum and cubic interpolation's guard points

2013-09-05 Thread Alexandros Drymonitis
When you send this message [sinesum 512 1( to a table Pd will automatically add one index to the beginning of the table and two indices to its end, and you end up with a table of 515 indices. The three additional indices are the guard points for the cubic interpolation, right? So the first index sh