Re: [PD] State Saving - Summary

2007-03-01 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Feb 14, 2007, at 10:17 AM, Frank Barknecht wrote: > Hallo, > Roman Haefeli hat gesagt: // Roman Haefeli wrote: > >> the state saving is more a side effect, since the main goal was to >> provide a system, that makes sure, that all patches have the same >> state, >> no matter when a user join

Re: [PD] State Saving - Summary

2007-02-14 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hallo, Roman Haefeli hat gesagt: // Roman Haefeli wrote: > the state saving is more a side effect, since the main goal was to > provide a system, that makes sure, that all patches have the same state, > no matter when a user joins a running session. since that was > implemented, it was very easy

Re: [PD] State Saving - Summary

2007-02-14 Thread Roman Haefeli
hello some notes about the state saving system used by netpd: the state saving is more a side effect, since the main goal was to provide a system, that makes sure, that all patches have the same state, no matter when a user joins a running session. since that was implemented, it was very easy to

[PD] State Saving - Summary

2007-02-14 Thread Luigi Rensinghoff
Since it is an ever returning subject maybe its good to have a summarized topic for this. Could someone just give a list of existing "state-saving"-systems and describe pro's and con's and the state of complexity ? i think that could be very helpful for beginners ;-) Thanks Luigi __