Since I'm doing this to ease multiple video processing (up to 18 short
videos), do you think it's ok to open several different net ports? or will
it then get stuck with that!?
2010/8/17 Mario Mora mare...@gmail.com
Hi Joao
You can achieve that by starting one instance of pd in the usual way
I open 40 sockets in pd sometimes (communicate with several flash/processing
clients over OSC and simple string commands...well almost the same), never
had an issue with that :)
2010/8/18 João de Brito Vidigal jbvidi...@gmail.com
Since I'm doing this to ease multiple video processing (up to 18
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 15:34 +0100, João de Brito Vidigal wrote:
Since I'm doing this to ease multiple video processing (up to 18 short
videos), do you think it's ok to open several different net ports? or
will it then get stuck with that!?
Most of the net classes in Pd I am aware of are not
p.s.: notice that my 40 sockets rarely have packets on them, its not poling
intensive. Just from time to time, when users change stuff around..
2010/8/18 Roman Haefeli reduz...@gmail.com
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 15:34 +0100, João de Brito Vidigal wrote:
Since I'm doing this to ease multiple
I think I just have to send messages to open a specific file, turn it on and
turn it off! should be no big deal!
I was just trying the [pd~] object... it's too much for me... can't handle
it... (specially under the stress I'm having!)
So... I'll try the udp I guess... but how do I do that?
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 16:27 +0100, João de Brito Vidigal wrote:
So... I'll try the udp I guess... but how do I do that?
I'd use [netsend 1] on the sender and [netreceive portnuber 1] on the
sender. You can use 'localhost' as host, if both are running on the same
box.
Roman
2010/8/18 Pedro
Hi
I remember reading somewhere that it is possible to have 2 Pd patches open
running synched at the same time.
This would be to manage sound and video in different patches in order not to
get (or get less) glitches in sound and video.
How do I do this?
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010, João de Brito Rocha Reis Vidigal wrote:
I remember reading somewhere that it is possible to have 2 Pd patches open
running synched at the same time.
This would be to manage sound and video in different patches in order not to
get (or get less) glitches in sound and video.
Does this mean that in Linux and on a dual core machine one instance of Pd
only uses one processor? Is there a way to know which processor it uses, and
whether it always uses the same processor?
Pierre
2010/8/17 Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010, João de Brito Rocha Reis
For communications between the two instances you can use OSC - that's
very flexible.
Em 17 de agosto de 2010 11:55, Pierre Massat pimas...@gmail.com escreveu:
Does this mean that in Linux and on a dual core machine one instance of Pd
only uses one processor? Is there a way to know which
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010, Pierre Massat wrote:
Does this mean that in Linux and on a dual core machine one instance of
Pd only uses one processor?
No, it doesn't mean that.
But all the messages and signals circulate in a since thread (on a single
cpu) unless you use special tools to split it
Any idea on how to get the first Pd working with one processor and the second
with the other?
I'm using the Arduino firmata to trigger both sound and video. I think I can't
open twice the same port! So how can I use the OSC then to sync the triggering!?
On 17 Aug 2010, at 16:05, Mathieu
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:05:57AM -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
Also, [soundfiler], some GEM input/output classes, and much of PDP, can
run in an alternate thread.
I think, you mean [readsf~] and [writesf~] instead of [soundfiler] here, which
in upstream Pd is unthreaded.
[pd~] may be
There's also the pd~ object that embeds a Pd instance within an object
inside another one. It's still under development but I've already been
using it pretty hard.
cheers
Miller
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:05:26PM -0300, Bernardo Barros wrote:
For communications between the two instances you
I'm using OSX
I want to sync 2 PD's (not 2 PD patches). One to control sound the other to
control video (GEM).
(your OS can tell you in which CPU a process is running, there are several cmd
tools in linux for that)
can OSX do it as well?
On 17 Aug 2010, at 16:15, Pedro Lopes wrote:
Can you
Then OSC will suit your perfectly (you can just use your messages through
sockets, if you don't want to use OSC, but I like it personally for many
reasons).
Just have one pd sending OSC messages to the other through a port. There's
several issues regarding serious sync, but if you feel that its
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010, Frank Barknecht wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:05:57AM -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
Also, [soundfiler], some GEM input/output classes, and much of PDP, can
run in an alternate thread.
I think, you mean [readsf~] and [writesf~] instead of [soundfiler] here, which
in
download these patches, they describe different approaches in how to approach
this
http://web.uni-weimar.de/medien/wiki/Audiovideo
mn.
Am 17.08.2010 um 17:18 schrieb João de Brito Rocha Reis Vidigal:
I'm using OSX
I want to sync 2 PD's (not 2 PD patches). One to control sound the other to
Hi Joao
You can achieve that by starting one instance of pd in the usual way (for
audio process by example) and the other one using the terminal app , writing
there the adress to the app and starting it with the ./Pd-extended command
by exampleit is recommended that you start the pd instace
19 matches
Mail list logo
