Re: [PD] Video synthesizer emulation
Ed: I don't really get what is your conversion for, can you elaborate a bit more? Tim: I've been already using [pix_sig2pix~] :) That said, thanks to rdz and matju on IRC I've managed to solve the high frequency issue. Actually the problems were two: me considering a crazy thing to set a sample rate in the mhz domain and the hardcoded limitation in the portaudio api of 2 mhz (if you go past this value it will reset the sample rate without telling you, that's why my first experiments were unsuccessful). Right now [pix_sig2pix~] is now working as aspected, 1 mhz frequency is enough to have all the vertical bars and stuff. I'll need to fine tune [block~] but I think it will work quite nicely in the end. Thanks everybody for the help! 2012/7/12 tim vets timv...@gmail.com 2012/7/12 tim vets timv...@gmail.com [sig2pix~] ? sorry, that shoulld be: [pix_sig2pix~] 2012/7/12 Off Screen offscr...@personalreport.it Hello everybody, I'm trying to emulate an analogue video synthesizer using GEM. My starting point is the LZX system, an old school analogue video synth which has been rebuilt today using modern circuitry components. Obviously that wonderful tool is way too expansive for me so I thought I could build something similar using Pd. My first goal is to succesfully emulate the Video Waveform Generator: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pbpFgvttBZw Here is a detailed description: http://www.lzxindustries.net/modules/video-waveform-generator I've tried to use [pix_sig2pix~], it works quite nicely and the patterns I get are almost identical to the ones in the video (including all the fm and pwm stuff). The problems are in the second part of the video, when they use high frequencies (~ 3mhz) to generate vertical bands. I'm pretty sure I can't use the same approach with Pd. The other option would be to use GLSL shaders, but it has two major drawbacks: first, it won't be using raw signal but control messages (no sound generation); second, it won't be patchable, once the parameters are converted into an image all the informations about frequencies are lost and I won't be able to use it to modulate another shader. I'd like to know from somebody who has much more experience than me what would be the best approach. Are there any limitations or constraints within the [pix_sig2pix~] object or Pd itself that I should be aware of? Any advice will be extremely appreciated. ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
[PD] Video synthesizer emulation
Hello everybody, I'm trying to emulate an analogue video synthesizer using GEM. My starting point is the LZX system, an old school analogue video synth which has been rebuilt today using modern circuitry components. Obviously that wonderful tool is way too expansive for me so I thought I could build something similar using Pd. My first goal is to succesfully emulate the Video Waveform Generator: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pbpFgvttBZw Here is a detailed description: http://www.lzxindustries.net/modules/video-waveform-generator I've tried to use [pix_sig2pix~], it works quite nicely and the patterns I get are almost identical to the ones in the video (including all the fm and pwm stuff). The problems are in the second part of the video, when they use high frequencies (~ 3mhz) to generate vertical bands. I'm pretty sure I can't use the same approach with Pd. The other option would be to use GLSL shaders, but it has two major drawbacks: first, it won't be using raw signal but control messages (no sound generation); second, it won't be patchable, once the parameters are converted into an image all the informations about frequencies are lost and I won't be able to use it to modulate another shader. I'd like to know from somebody who has much more experience than me what would be the best approach. Are there any limitations or constraints within the [pix_sig2pix~] object or Pd itself that I should be aware of? Any advice will be extremely appreciated. ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] Video synthesizer emulation
Perhaps a good place to start is to work out what the aliased value of 3.2MHz is - i.e. when you divide 3.2MHz by the number of lines over which the signal is spread (625 for the PAL system). Patch enclosed, Ed Gemnotes-0.1alpha: Live music notation for Pure Data http://sharktracks.co.uk/ From: Off Screen offscr...@personalreport.it To: pd-list@iem.at Sent: Thursday, 12 July 2012, 18:20 Subject: [PD] Video synthesizer emulation Hello everybody, I'm trying to emulate an analogue video synthesizer using GEM. My starting point is the LZX system, an old school analogue video synth which has been rebuilt today using modern circuitry components. Obviously that wonderful tool is way too expansive for me so I thought I could build something similar using Pd. My first goal is to succesfully emulate the Video Waveform Generator: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pbpFgvttBZw Here is a detailed description: http://www.lzxindustries.net/modules/video-waveform-generator I've tried to use [pix_sig2pix~], it works quite nicely and the patterns I get are almost identical to the ones in the video (including all the fm and pwm stuff). The problems are in the second part of the video, when they use high frequencies (~ 3mhz) to generate vertical bands. I'm pretty sure I can't use the same approach with Pd. The other option would be to use GLSL shaders, but it has two major drawbacks: first, it won't be using raw signal but control messages (no sound generation); second, it won't be patchable, once the parameters are converted into an image all the informations about frequencies are lost and I won't be able to use it to modulate another shader. I'd like to know from somebody who has much more experience than me what would be the best approach. Are there any limitations or constraints within the [pix_sig2pix~] object or Pd itself that I should be aware of? Any advice will be extremely appreciated. ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list Mhz-Alias.pd Description: Binary data ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] Video synthesizer emulation
[sig2pix~] ? 2012/7/12 Off Screen offscr...@personalreport.it Hello everybody, I'm trying to emulate an analogue video synthesizer using GEM. My starting point is the LZX system, an old school analogue video synth which has been rebuilt today using modern circuitry components. Obviously that wonderful tool is way too expansive for me so I thought I could build something similar using Pd. My first goal is to succesfully emulate the Video Waveform Generator: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pbpFgvttBZw Here is a detailed description: http://www.lzxindustries.net/modules/video-waveform-generator I've tried to use [pix_sig2pix~], it works quite nicely and the patterns I get are almost identical to the ones in the video (including all the fm and pwm stuff). The problems are in the second part of the video, when they use high frequencies (~ 3mhz) to generate vertical bands. I'm pretty sure I can't use the same approach with Pd. The other option would be to use GLSL shaders, but it has two major drawbacks: first, it won't be using raw signal but control messages (no sound generation); second, it won't be patchable, once the parameters are converted into an image all the informations about frequencies are lost and I won't be able to use it to modulate another shader. I'd like to know from somebody who has much more experience than me what would be the best approach. Are there any limitations or constraints within the [pix_sig2pix~] object or Pd itself that I should be aware of? Any advice will be extremely appreciated. ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] Video synthesizer emulation
2012/7/12 tim vets timv...@gmail.com [sig2pix~] ? sorry, that shoulld be: [pix_sig2pix~] 2012/7/12 Off Screen offscr...@personalreport.it Hello everybody, I'm trying to emulate an analogue video synthesizer using GEM. My starting point is the LZX system, an old school analogue video synth which has been rebuilt today using modern circuitry components. Obviously that wonderful tool is way too expansive for me so I thought I could build something similar using Pd. My first goal is to succesfully emulate the Video Waveform Generator: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pbpFgvttBZw Here is a detailed description: http://www.lzxindustries.net/modules/video-waveform-generator I've tried to use [pix_sig2pix~], it works quite nicely and the patterns I get are almost identical to the ones in the video (including all the fm and pwm stuff). The problems are in the second part of the video, when they use high frequencies (~ 3mhz) to generate vertical bands. I'm pretty sure I can't use the same approach with Pd. The other option would be to use GLSL shaders, but it has two major drawbacks: first, it won't be using raw signal but control messages (no sound generation); second, it won't be patchable, once the parameters are converted into an image all the informations about frequencies are lost and I won't be able to use it to modulate another shader. I'd like to know from somebody who has much more experience than me what would be the best approach. Are there any limitations or constraints within the [pix_sig2pix~] object or Pd itself that I should be aware of? Any advice will be extremely appreciated. ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
