On Sun, 17 Oct 2010, Roman Haefeli wrote:
AFAIK, both, [vd~] and [tabread4~] do a 4-point interpolation. Or am I
overseeing something?
Yes, they are both using the same interpolator, namely, Miller's poor
choice of using a Lagrange interpolation, where each piece is part of a
curve that goes
2010/10/17 tim vets
>
>
> 2010/10/17 Andy Farnell
>
>
>>
>> [vd~]
>>
>> If you want to read at a vari-rate from a buffer
>> then AFIK you can only use the [delwrite~]/[vd~]
>> pairing.
>>
>>
> isn't that possible with something like:
>
> [phasor~]
> |
> [+~] < add offset here
>
2010/10/17 Andy Farnell
>
>
> [vd~]
>
> If you want to read at a vari-rate from a buffer
> then AFIK you can only use the [delwrite~]/[vd~]
> pairing.
>
>
isn't that possible with something like:
[phasor~]
|
[+~] < add offset here
|
[tabread~ mytable]
?
but, for the record, I
On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 18:43 +0100, Andy Farnell wrote:
>
> [vd~]
>
> If you want to read at a vari-rate from a buffer
> then AFIK you can only use the [delwrite~]/[vd~]
> pairing.
[delwrite~]/[delread~] could be replaced by [tabwrite~]/[tabread~].
[delwrite~]/[vd~] could be replaced by [tabwrit
On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 08:39 -0700, Tyler Leavitt wrote:
> The problem is I've already written my patch for a delay line =)
>
>
> I also read that tables have some latency when using them in loopers
> (what I am doing)
You always have a latency of one block when doing recursion, no matter
if it'
[vd~]
If you want to read at a vari-rate from a buffer
then AFIK you can only use the [delwrite~]/[vd~]
pairing.
On Sun, 17 Oct 2010 18:21:48 +0200
tim vets wrote:
> I still don't see anything in this you can only do with delay lines and not
> with tables,
--
Andy Farnell
___
2010/10/17 Tyler Leavitt
> The problem is I've already written my patch for a delay line =)
>
> I also read that tables have some latency when using them in loopers (what
> I am doing) because they can only write in block size. I was about to switch
> to using tables and then I read this...
>
>
>
The problem is I've already written my patch for a delay line =)
I also read that tables have some latency when using them in loopers (what I
am doing) because they can only write in block size. I was about to switch
to using tables and then I read this...
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 6:38 AM, tim vet
2010/10/17 Peter Plessas
> tim vets wrote:
>
>> 2010/10/17 Tyler Leavitt
>>
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/pd-list@iem.at/msg00287.html
>>>
>>> I googled my question and came up with this thread... considering it was
>>> 4
>>> years old I figured maybe someone out there had a fresh solution...
tim vets wrote:
2010/10/17 Tyler Leavitt
http://www.mail-archive.com/pd-list@iem.at/msg00287.html
I googled my question and came up with this thread... considering it was 4
years old I figured maybe someone out there had a fresh solution...
I need to clear a delay that I have written via del
2010/10/17 Tyler Leavitt
> http://www.mail-archive.com/pd-list@iem.at/msg00287.html
>
> I googled my question and came up with this thread... considering it was 4
> years old I figured maybe someone out there had a fresh solution...
>
> I need to clear a delay that I have written via delwrite~. I
http://www.mail-archive.com/pd-list@iem.at/msg00287.html
I googled my question and came up with this thread... considering it was 4
years old I figured maybe someone out there had a fresh solution...
I need to clear a delay that I have written via delwrite~. Is there any way
to do this yet?
Tyle
yeah i decided to go with the poly option.
still, it would be nice if there was a clear option for delwrite~
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Hello,
besides the solution provided by Frank, you can try these two things:
1. use two (or more) delay lines that are filled circularly.
Example for 4 lines. When you play a note, first use line #1. The following note
will be sent to line #2, the third to #3, the fourth to #4, the fifth to #1, e
Hallo,
hard off hat gesagt: // hard off wrote:
> i made an fm synth that has a delay line on it,
>
> and if i retrigger notes faster than the delay on the delay line, the
> delay from the previous note bleeds into the new note.
Maybe use more than one delayline and switch them with [poly]?
Ciao
Hallo,
Roman Haefeli hat gesagt: // Roman Haefeli wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 18:27 +0900, hard off wrote:
> > is there any way to clear a delwrite~ object so that i don't get
> > unwanted feedback? or pehaps another way to write a delayline that is
> > clearable?
>
> i can't think of a situa
i made an fm synth that has a delay line on it,
and if i retrigger notes faster than the delay on the delay line, the
delay from the previous note bleeds into the new note.
this makes clicks when the 2 notes overlap.
i can think of a workaround, but if there would be a way to clear the
delaylin
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 18:27 +0900, hard off wrote:
> is there any way to clear a delwrite~ object so that i don't get
> unwanted feedback? or pehaps another way to write a delayline that is
> clearable?
i can't think of a situation, where clearing the delay~-line would be
better than just muting
is there any way to clear a delwrite~ object so that i don't get
unwanted feedback? or pehaps another way to write a delayline that is
clearable?
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo
19 matches
Mail list logo
