[PD] inflating PD-Vanilla (was Re: [almost OT] need suggestions for an implementation)

2008-03-13 Thread Matteo Sisti Sette
I do totally agree that [pdlua] is a great thing and that it would be desirable to have it become part of PD-Vanilla. Nevertheless, Frank Barknecht wrote: Some people may miss [s2l] in vanilla Pd, others miss a [pipe] for variable length lists or a multi-period [metro], a flexible markov

Re: [PD] inflating PD-Vanilla (was Re: [almost OT] need suggestions for an implementation)

2008-03-13 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 17:26 +0100, Matteo Sisti Sette wrote: I do totally agree that [pdlua] is a great thing and that it would be desirable to have it become part of PD-Vanilla. Nevertheless, Frank Barknecht wrote: Some people may miss [s2l] in vanilla Pd, others miss a [pipe] for

Re: [PD] inflating PD-Vanilla (was Re: [almost OT] need suggestions for an implementation)

2008-03-13 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Mar 13, 2008, at 1:36 PM, Roman Haefeli wrote: On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 17:26 +0100, Matteo Sisti Sette wrote: I do totally agree that [pdlua] is a great thing and that it would be desirable to have it become part of PD-Vanilla. Nevertheless, Frank Barknecht wrote: Some people may miss