Re: [PD] my phase vocoder example implemented in polar form
although it says here http://crca.ucsd.edu/~syadegar/expr.html it's been added to version 4... so I still suspect I studied previous versions and missed it. 2012/1/10 Mathieu Bouchard > Le 2012-01-10 à 16:27:00, Alexandre Torres Porres a écrit : > > > by the way, that's a new expr function, right? when did it appear?cheers >> > > I don't know. All the new expr functions are quite old... > > > __**__** > __ > | Mathieu BOUCHARD - téléphone : +1.514.383.3801 - Montréal, QC > ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] my phase vocoder example implemented in polar form
Le 2012-01-10 à 16:27:00, Alexandre Torres Porres a écrit : by the way, that's a new expr function, right? when did it appear?cheers I don't know. All the new expr functions are quite old... __ | Mathieu BOUCHARD - téléphone : +1.514.383.3801 - Montréal, QC___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] my phase vocoder example implemented in polar form
by the way, that's a new expr function, right? when did it appear? cheers 2012/1/10 Alexandre Torres Porres > I had tried it a different way... well, I didn't know there was this > function in expr, COOL! > thanks > > > 2012/1/10 Mathieu Bouchard > >> Le 2012-01-10 à 14:26:00, Alexandre Torres Porres a écrit : >> >>> 2012/1/10 Mathieu Bouchard >>> Did you look at fmod() ? it's a function with two args in [expr]. >>> I dont have that here, just "%", but it doesn't work as it rounds thing >>> up. >>> >> >> What I mean is something like [expr fmod($f1,$f2)]. >> >> That's what is meant by « a function in [expr] ». >> >> >> __**__** >> __ >> | Mathieu BOUCHARD - téléphone : +1.514.383.3801 - Montréal, QC >> > > ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] my phase vocoder example implemented in polar form
I had tried it a different way... well, I didn't know there was this function in expr, COOL! thanks 2012/1/10 Mathieu Bouchard > Le 2012-01-10 à 14:26:00, Alexandre Torres Porres a écrit : > >> 2012/1/10 Mathieu Bouchard >> >>> Did you look at fmod() ? it's a function with two args in [expr]. >>> >> I dont have that here, just "%", but it doesn't work as it rounds thing >> up. >> > > What I mean is something like [expr fmod($f1,$f2)]. > > That's what is meant by « a function in [expr] ». > > > __**__** > __ > | Mathieu BOUCHARD - téléphone : +1.514.383.3801 - Montréal, QC > ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] my phase vocoder example implemented in polar form
Le 2012-01-10 à 14:26:00, Alexandre Torres Porres a écrit : 2012/1/10 Mathieu Bouchard Did you look at fmod() ? it's a function with two args in [expr]. I dont have that here, just "%", but it doesn't work as it rounds thing up. What I mean is something like [expr fmod($f1,$f2)]. That's what is meant by « a function in [expr] ». __ | Mathieu BOUCHARD - téléphone : +1.514.383.3801 - Montréal, QC___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] my phase vocoder example implemented in polar form
I dont have that here, just "%", but it doesn't work as it rounds thing up. cheers 2012/1/10 Mathieu Bouchard > Le 2012-01-10 à 05:35:00, Alexandre Torres Porres a écrit : > > > by the way, I figured out a simple way of having an actual accurate loop >> inside [expr] in a similar fashion. something like expr if ($f1 >= end_$0, >> $f1 - end_$0, if ($f1 < 0, end_$0 + $f1, $f1)) >> > > Did you look at fmod() ? it's a function with two args in [expr]. > > __**__** > __ > | Mathieu BOUCHARD - téléphone : +1.514.383.3801 - Montréal, QC ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] my phase vocoder example implemented in polar form
Le 2012-01-10 à 05:35:00, Alexandre Torres Porres a écrit : by the way, I figured out a simple way of having an actual accurate loop inside [expr] in a similar fashion. something like expr if ($f1 >= end_$0, $f1 - end_$0, if ($f1 < 0, end_$0 + $f1, $f1)) Did you look at fmod() ? it's a function with two args in [expr]. __ | Mathieu BOUCHARD - téléphone : +1.514.383.3801 - Montréal, QC___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] my phase vocoder example implemented in polar form
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 05:35:50AM -0200, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > by the way, I figured out a simple way of having an actual accurate loop > inside [expr] in a similar fashion. > > something like > > expr if ($f1 >= end_$0, $f1 - end_$0, if ($f1 < 0, end_$0 + $f1, $f1)) > > and the after the [line~] object I also take take care of it > > expr~ if ($v1 >= end_$0, $v1 - end_$0, $v1) > > as for the back window, the above output is subtracted a hop size, and I do > this expr~ if ($v1 < 0, $v1 + end_$0, $v1) so it doesnt get negative. > > Sounds fine, perfect looping, thanks to [expr] Isn't this actually very similar to the simpler and faster [wrap~] (see attachment)? [wrap~] is different in that it will also wrap around for values larger than twice the loop size and it will wrap around in negavite areas as well, but I think, that's what you want anyway. Ciao -- Frank BarknechtDo You RjDj.me? _ __footils.org__ wrapper.pd Description: application/puredata ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
