On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
most likely the same happens when you load gridflow (unless matju has
done some weird hacking)
I find the [objectmaker] class entry that says print and I modify the
function-pointer variable in it. Pd doesn't get to know about it in any
way.
The key different between your Gem example and the GF vs. Pd [print]
is that you are talking about objects within the same library. The
[print] issue is about a library versus core. Overriding core objects
in a library seems like a bad idea, especially when its so simple to
call it
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Overriding core objects in a library seems like a bad idea, especially
when its so simple to call it something different.
It's so that patches that don't know about extra atomtypes can still
handle extra atomtypes. Calling it something
