Hi Hans,
Hmm... interesting. So does it mean that they do not share
pdsettings anymore either? I am not sure if I see any advantages with
this approach (and I don't really have enough brain estate now to
actually ponder that question, next month probably :)) but thanks for
clearing that up.
On Tue, 11 May 2010, Michal Seta wrote:
Hmm... interesting. So does it mean that they do not share pdsettings
anymore either? I am not sure if I see any advantages with this
approach (and I don't really have enough brain estate now to actually
ponder that question, next month probably :))
On 2010-05-11 07:07, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
The 'pd-extended' package can now co-exist with the official 'puredata'
package, hence the binary being called 'pdextended'. It should show up
in the applications menu, so that's a bug. As for pdsend/pdreceive,
install 'puredata' to get
Correct, Pd-extended will use .pdextended instead of .pdsettings.
This kind of stuff is a common source of confusion for newbies. And
others complain of wanting to set vanilla and extended prefs separately.
.hc
On May 11, 2010, at 9:46 AM, Michal Seta wrote:
Hi Hans,
Hmm...
On May 11, 2010, at 11:35 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
On 2010-05-11 07:07, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
The 'pd-extended' package can now co-exist with the official
'puredata'
package, hence the binary being called 'pdextended'. It should
show up
in the applications menu, so that's
Hi all + Hans,
I just installed pd-extended (0.42.5 build of april 30 2010) on a new
machine to discover that it is now called pdextended and it does not
show up in the applications menu (should I report a bug somewhere?)
and that pdsend is missing. Is pdsend/pdreceive being phased out?
Are
The 'pd-extended' package can now co-exist with the official
'puredata' package, hence the binary being called 'pdextended'. It
should show up in the applications menu, so that's a bug. As for
pdsend/pdreceive, install 'puredata' to get those. Ultimately, I
think those will go into a
