Re: [PD] pdj in 0.40 and 0.41
On May 10, 2008, at 3:37 AM, marius schebella wrote: marius schebella wrote: Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: The schedlib stuff was added in 0.41, it doesn't exist in 0.40, AFAIK. pdj also runs without schedlib. -schedlib stuff is needed for gui elements and pascal has added a patch for osx that fixes the schedlib thing (osx_extsched_fix.patch), but I am not sure if it gets applied (would be cool if it would, but I don't think it is). this is what pascal sent: ... this patch has not yet been submitted to the pure-data dev list. This patch is only required if you are using Java AWT/Swing GUI elements within your Java code, otherwise everything will work fine. If you really need to use AWT, you will need a more recent version of pure-data that support the -schedlib option with OS X (and 0.40-3 only supports windows). While pd 0.41-2 added the support for OS X and Linux, there is still a small bug that crash pd when you are trying to load a external scheduler. The patch to this is in the source distribution of pdj and it needs to be applied to a pd 0.41-2 version. the patched pd-version does not crash with -schedlib anymore. marius. That patch applies to code that is not in 0.40.3, IIRC, so nothing I can do about this release. .hc All information should be free. - the hacker ethic ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] pdj in 0.40 and 0.41
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: The schedlib stuff was added in 0.41, it doesn't exist in 0.40, AFAIK. pdj also runs without schedlib. -schedlib stuff is needed for gui elements and pascal has added a patch for osx that fixes the schedlib thing (osx_extsched_fix.patch), but I am not sure if it gets applied (would be cool if it would, but I don't think it is). this is what pascal sent: ... this patch has not yet been submitted to the pure-data dev list. This patch is only required if you are using Java AWT/Swing GUI elements within your Java code, otherwise everything will work fine. If you really need to use AWT, you will need a more recent version of pure-data that support the -schedlib option with OS X (and 0.40-3 only supports windows). While pd 0.41-2 added the support for OS X and Linux, there is still a small bug that crash pd when you are trying to load a external scheduler. The patch to this is in the source distribution of pdj and it needs to be applied to a pd 0.41-2 version. but again, it should also run with 0.40.3 and hence with pd-extended... marius. On May 6, 2008, at 6:01 PM, marius schebella wrote: hi, I am still not sure, why pdj is not working with pd-extended 0.40.3, only with 0.41? I also wanted to use the scheduler as mentioned int he pdj readme, but none of the pd versions will start anymore with the -schedlib flag set. am I missing libraries? I am on os x 10.5. marius. ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list All information should be free. - the hacker ethic ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] pdj in 0.40 and 0.41
marius schebella wrote: Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: The schedlib stuff was added in 0.41, it doesn't exist in 0.40, AFAIK. pdj also runs without schedlib. -schedlib stuff is needed for gui elements and pascal has added a patch for osx that fixes the schedlib thing (osx_extsched_fix.patch), but I am not sure if it gets applied (would be cool if it would, but I don't think it is). this is what pascal sent: ... this patch has not yet been submitted to the pure-data dev list. This patch is only required if you are using Java AWT/Swing GUI elements within your Java code, otherwise everything will work fine. If you really need to use AWT, you will need a more recent version of pure-data that support the -schedlib option with OS X (and 0.40-3 only supports windows). While pd 0.41-2 added the support for OS X and Linux, there is still a small bug that crash pd when you are trying to load a external scheduler. The patch to this is in the source distribution of pdj and it needs to be applied to a pd 0.41-2 version. the patched pd-version does not crash with -schedlib anymore. marius. ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] pdj in 0.40 and 0.41
The schedlib stuff was added in 0.41, it doesn't exist in 0.40, AFAIK. .hc On May 6, 2008, at 6:01 PM, marius schebella wrote: hi, I am still not sure, why pdj is not working with pd-extended 0.40.3, only with 0.41? I also wanted to use the scheduler as mentioned int he pdj readme, but none of the pd versions will start anymore with the -schedlib flag set. am I missing libraries? I am on os x 10.5. marius. ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list All information should be free. - the hacker ethic ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
[PD] pdj in 0.40 and 0.41
hi, I am still not sure, why pdj is not working with pd-extended 0.40.3, only with 0.41? I also wanted to use the scheduler as mentioned int he pdj readme, but none of the pd versions will start anymore with the -schedlib flag set. am I missing libraries? I am on os x 10.5. marius. ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
