Re: [PD] pduino

2014-03-25 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 19:19 +0100, ro...@dds.nl wrote: i'm trying to use Pduino-0.5 and/or pduino-master (from reduzent) with Windows 7 and Arduino Uno. i don't get anything with [info( or [firmware( or [version(. it's possible to pulse all outputs, i.e. it's visible on Led13. toggling

Re: [PD] pduino

2014-03-25 Thread rolfm
sorry for the noise. i did not realize Standard Firmata is a specific 'sketch' which is in the examples. thx, rolf ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

[PD] pduino

2014-03-24 Thread rolfm
i'm trying to use Pduino-0.5 and/or pduino-master (from reduzent) with Windows 7 and Arduino Uno. i don't get anything with [info( or [firmware( or [version(. it's possible to pulse all outputs, i.e. it's visible on Led13. toggling Led13 in Pduino only gives a short flash on the Led. the GUI

Re: [PD] PDuino/Firmata - arduino object - PWM servo problem

2013-05-03 Thread Maciej Sledziecki
Solved the problem - has nothing to do with the PD object but only with the behaviour of the Arduino servo library: On boards other than the Mega, use of the library disables analogWrite() (PWM) functionality on pins 9 and 10, whether or not there is a Servo on those pins.

[PD] PDuino/Firmata - arduino object - PWM servo problem

2013-04-30 Thread Maciej Sledziecki
Hello, I´m running StandardFirmata 2.3. on Arduino Uno with PD extended 0.43.4 on MacBookPro / MacOSX 10.6.8. What I´m trying to do, is to drive two pins (9 10) in pwm mode and at least two others (5 6) in servo mode. The pwm works fine - but only until I set one of the other pins to servo -

[PD] pduino download?

2013-01-20 Thread Phil Stone
Hi Hans, Is this still the right link for downloading Pduino? http://at.or.at/hans/pd/Pduino-0.5.zip It's currently timing out (found on this page: http://puredata.info/downloads/pduino/releases/0.5). thanks, Phil Stone ___ Pd-list@iem.at

Re: [PD] pduino download?

2013-01-20 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
DNS troubles. Its fixed, but it might take a day or so to expire in your DNS cache. pduino is now also included in Pd-extended 0.43.4. .hc On 01/20/2013 03:01 AM, Phil Stone wrote: Hi Hans, Is this still the right link for downloading Pduino? http://at.or.at/hans/pd/Pduino-0.5.zip

Re: [PD] pduino patch help

2012-05-07 Thread olsen
Ej Drake you've to put the arduino.pd abstraction and all other patches you're refering within the same folder where you saved your patch. Another problemo is your patch is refering to [arduino] and [Arduino] - notice the upper and the lower case - guess it should be lowercase [arduino] only!

[PD] pduino patch help

2012-05-04 Thread Drake Schutt
I've got a fairly simple patch that I got help from someone on the list in building. It just takes midi data from 16 drum pads and routes the bangs to different output pins. The pins then trigger a seperate solenoids with the arduino board. These solenoids hit actual drums. I thought the pd

Re: [PD] pduino patch help

2012-05-04 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Attach the patch, then we can take a look , attached pd patches are welcome, common and even encouraged here! :-D .hc On May 4, 2012, at 2:59 PM, Drake Schutt wrote: I've got a fairly simple patch that I got help from someone on the list in building. It just takes midi data from 16 drum

Re: [PD] pduino patch help

2012-05-04 Thread Björn Eriksson
Hello, in fact you can put attachments here on the list. I am sorry but I am not really helpful on this matter, as I am myself also trying to get some piezo-triggerings onto Pd through Arduino and are still learning around this. I wouldn´t mind take a look at the patch - but as said before - I am

Re: [PD] pduino patch help

2012-05-04 Thread Drake Schutt
you'll find my patch attached! On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.atwrote: Attach the patch, then we can take a look , attached pd patches are welcome, common and even encouraged here! :-D .hc On May 4, 2012, at 2:59 PM, Drake Schutt wrote: I've got a

Re: [PD] pduino patches on pdx

2012-04-17 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
it helps - Mail original - De: Roman Haefeli reduz...@gmail.com À: pd-list@iem.at Envoyé: Mardi 10 Avril 2012 17:16:36 Objet: Re: [PD] pduino patches on pdx On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 15:54 +0200, Patrice Colet wrote: Hello, I've downloaded a zip at this url: https://github.com

Re: [PD] pduino patches on pdx

2012-04-17 Thread Patrice Colet
Great you rock, let's eat the omlet ^^ Colet Patrice - Mail original - De: Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at À: Patrice Colet colet.patr...@free.fr, pd-list pd-list@iem.at Envoyé: Mardi 17 Avril 2012 19:03:00 Objet: Re: [PD] pduino patches on pdx So I added support for Pd

Re: [PD] pduino patches on pdx

2012-04-15 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
original - De: Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at À: Patrice Colet colet.patr...@free.fr Cc: pd-list pd-list@iem.at Envoyé: Jeudi 12 Avril 2012 17:03:26 Objet: Re: [PD] pduino patches on pdx Why's that? .hc On Apr 12, 2012, at 10:46 AM, Patrice Colet wrote: I just hope libdir

Re: [PD] pduino patches on pdx

2012-04-12 Thread Patrice Colet
I just hope libdir will never go into vanilla ^^ Colet Patrice - Mail original - De: Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at À: Patrice Colet colet.patr...@free.fr Cc: pd-list pd-list@iem.at, Roman Haefeli reduz...@gmail.com Envoyé: Jeudi 12 Avril 2012 04:49:32 Objet: Re: [PD] pduino

Re: [PD] pduino patches on pdx

2012-04-12 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
...@gmail.com Envoyé: Jeudi 12 Avril 2012 04:49:32 Objet: Re: [PD] pduino patches on pdx It would affect vanilla if you have the libdir loader running in it. Its related to that. .hc On Apr 11, 2012, at 7:57 PM, Patrice Colet wrote: I've switched back to vanilla, no bug anymore :D

Re: [PD] pduino patches on pdx

2012-04-12 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 22:49 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: It would affect vanilla if you have the libdir loader running in it. Its related to that. I think I experienced once also problem with maximum object loading depth 1000 reached and this was on Pd-vanilla without libdir. So

Re: [PD] pduino patches on pdx

2012-04-12 Thread Patrice Colet
colet.patr...@free.fr Cc: pd-list pd-list@iem.at Envoyé: Jeudi 12 Avril 2012 17:03:26 Objet: Re: [PD] pduino patches on pdx Why's that? .hc On Apr 12, 2012, at 10:46 AM, Patrice Colet wrote: I just hope libdir will never go into vanilla ^^ Colet Patrice - Mail original

Re: [PD] pduino patches on pdx

2012-04-11 Thread Patrice Colet
I've switched back to vanilla, no bug anymore :D Colet Patrice - Mail original - De: Roman Haefeli reduz...@gmail.com À: pd-list@iem.at Envoyé: Mardi 10 Avril 2012 22:42:54 Objet: Re: [PD] pduino patches on pdx On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 10:17 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote

Re: [PD] pduino patches on pdx

2012-04-11 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
@iem.at Envoyé: Mardi 10 Avril 2012 22:42:54 Objet: Re: [PD] pduino patches on pdx On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 10:17 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Apr 10, 2012, at 9:54 AM, Patrice Colet wrote: Hello, I've downloaded a zip at this url: https://github.com/reduzent/pduino to get

[PD] pduino patches on pdx

2012-04-10 Thread Patrice Colet
Hello, I've downloaded a zip at this url: https://github.com/reduzent/pduino to get arduino patches for the 0.43.1-extended-20111221* release I've got installed in my vista box. When I'm launching an help patch I've got this error message in console: maximum object loading depth 1000

Re: [PD] pduino patches on pdx

2012-04-10 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Apr 10, 2012, at 9:54 AM, Patrice Colet wrote: Hello, I've downloaded a zip at this url: https://github.com/reduzent/pduino to get arduino patches for the 0.43.1-extended-20111221* release I've got installed in my vista box. When I'm launching an help patch I've got this error

Re: [PD] pduino patches on pdx

2012-04-10 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 15:54 +0200, Patrice Colet wrote: Hello, I've downloaded a zip at this url: https://github.com/reduzent/pduino to get arduino patches for the 0.43.1-extended-20111221* release I've got installed in my vista box. When I'm launching an help patch I've got this

Re: [PD] pduino patches on pdx

2012-04-10 Thread Patrice Colet
Colet Patrice - Mail original - De: Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at FYI, that version of Pduino is a development version. If you want the current stable release, then use this release: http://puredata.info/downloads/pduino Yes, very interesting, I have all digital

Re: [PD] pduino patches on pdx

2012-04-10 Thread Patrice Colet
to 20120410, also tried to create [arduino] object in a naked patch, same result. hope it helps - Mail original - De: Roman Haefeli reduz...@gmail.com À: pd-list@iem.at Envoyé: Mardi 10 Avril 2012 17:16:36 Objet: Re: [PD] pduino patches on pdx On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 15:54 +0200, Patrice

Re: [PD] pduino patches on pdx

2012-04-10 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
original - De: Roman Haefeli reduz...@gmail.com À: pd-list@iem.at Envoyé: Mardi 10 Avril 2012 17:16:36 Objet: Re: [PD] pduino patches on pdx On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 15:54 +0200, Patrice Colet wrote: Hello, I've downloaded a zip at this url: https://github.com/reduzent/pduino

Re: [PD] pduino patches on pdx

2012-04-10 Thread Patrice Colet
: [PD] pduino patches on pdx I see what you are doing now. Pd only works like that for binary objects, not abstractions, i.e. : - extra/comport/comport.pd_linux can be loaded as [comport] - extra/arduino/arduino.pd triggers that 1000 error when loaded as [arduino] As an aside, you really

Re: [PD] pduino patches on pdx

2012-04-10 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 10:17 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Apr 10, 2012, at 9:54 AM, Patrice Colet wrote: Hello, I've downloaded a zip at this url: https://github.com/reduzent/pduino to get arduino patches for the 0.43.1-extended-20111221* release I've got installed

Re: [PD] pduino patches on pdx

2012-04-10 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 13:31 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: I see what you are doing now. Pd only works like that for binary objects, not abstractions, i.e. : - extra/comport/comport.pd_linux can be loaded as [comport] - extra/arduino/arduino.pd triggers that 1000 error when loaded as

Re: [PD] pduino patches on pdx

2012-04-10 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Apr 10, 2012, at 4:42 PM, Roman Haefeli wrote: On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 10:17 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Apr 10, 2012, at 9:54 AM, Patrice Colet wrote: Hello, I've downloaded a zip at this url: https://github.com/reduzent/pduino to get arduino patches for the

Re: [PD] pduino patches on pdx

2012-04-10 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Apr 10, 2012, at 4:44 PM, Roman Haefeli wrote: On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 13:31 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: I see what you are doing now. Pd only works like that for binary objects, not abstractions, i.e. : - extra/comport/comport.pd_linux can be loaded as [comport] -

Re: [PD] Pduino: Call for testing

2012-03-06 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 08:35 +0100, Jordi Sala wrote: hi, I've done a very simple test, and it works fine! https://vimeo.com/37914564 Cool! Thanks for that. (Solely from watching the video, it's hard to judge whether everything is working as expected. I assume, you were able more easily

Re: [PD] Pduino: Call for testing

2012-03-06 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Mar 4, 2012, at 9:45 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote: On Sat, 2012-03-03 at 22:27 -0800, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: I would prefer that you use a different name unless you are interested in providing strict compatibility with the current Pduino. Yes, actually I'm interested. Things

Re: [PD] Pduino: Call for testing

2012-03-06 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 10:56 -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Mar 4, 2012, at 9:45 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote: Actually [zexy/makesymbol] wasn't ever used in [arduino], only in arduino-help.pd . There it's used to display the Firmware version in a GOP cnv object - [zexy/makesymbol

Re: [PD] Pduino: Call for testing

2012-03-06 Thread Jordi Sala
yes, it works fine! On 6 March 2012 17:12, Roman Haefeli reduz...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 10:56 -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Mar 4, 2012, at 9:45 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote: Actually [zexy/makesymbol] wasn't ever used in [arduino], only in arduino-help.pd . There

Re: [PD] Pduino: Call for testing

2012-03-04 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Sat, 2012-03-03 at 22:27 -0800, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: I would prefer that you use a different name unless you are interested in providing strict compatibility with the current Pduino. Yes, actually I'm interested. Things like using namespace prefixes are one example of

Re: [PD] Pduino: Call for testing

2012-03-04 Thread Jordi Sala
hi, I've done a very simple test, and it works fine! https://vimeo.com/37914564 On 4 March 2012 15:45, Roman Haefeli reduz...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, 2012-03-03 at 22:27 -0800, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: I would prefer that you use a different name unless you are interested in

Re: [PD] Pduino: Call for testing

2012-03-03 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hi Hans On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 08:55 -0800, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: I'm happy to see you working on this. Since you are making a new version, perhaps it makes sense to change the names. Like maybe it makes sense to change the object from [arduino] to [firmata]? That's something I

Re: [PD] Pduino: Call for testing

2012-03-03 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
It won't really be a fork since I plan on making one more release, then I'm unlikely to touch the code again. So really, your development will be the active development. I would prefer that you use a different name unless you are interested in providing strict compatibility with the current

Re: [PD] Pduino: Call for testing

2012-03-02 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Hey Roman, I'm happy to see you working on this. Since you are making a new version, perhaps it makes sense to change the names. Like maybe it makes sense to change the object from [arduino] to [firmata]? That's something I thought about doing in the past. This would also make it easier

[PD] Pduino: Call for testing

2012-02-28 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hi all An improved version of [arduino] and its help patch is ready for testing and commenting. There is also a new [arduino-gui] class, that graphically emulates an Arduino board and is supposed to be very easy to use, especially for beginners. Get it from here:

Re: [PD] Pduino: Call for testing

2012-02-28 Thread Pierre Massat
Sweet! I'll take some time, probably this week-end, to test it with my setup. Pierre. 2012/2/28 Roman Haefeli reduz...@gmail.com Hi all An improved version of [arduino] and its help patch is ready for testing and commenting. There is also a new [arduino-gui] class, that graphically

Re: [PD] Pduino: Call for testing

2012-02-28 Thread Richie Cyngler
Sounds great Roman, I have a gig tomorrow night so I don't want to mess with my setup right now. But I'll definitely give it whirl after that. Thanks! On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Pierre Massat pimas...@gmail.com wrote: Sweet! I'll take some time, probably this week-end, to test it with

Re: [PD] pduino test patch: old analog/digital controls

2011-11-24 Thread olsen
heho i just put my attempt for a solution considering this pin numbering confusion into github: https://github.com/reduzent/pduino take a look if time and leisure permitting - I'm herewith opening the suggestion box! thanks in advance salutis ø On 11/09/2011 09:54 AM, olsen wrote: Thanks

Re: [PD] pduino test patch: old analog/digital controls

2011-11-09 Thread olsen
Thanks Hans for making this thing clear - I'll try to find an adequate solution for the rewritten pduino-help asap! best ø On 11/03/2011 03:39 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: That confusion originates from the Arduino numbering scheme itself, since it uses A0 for analog pins in analog

Re: [PD] pduino test patch: old analog/digital controls

2011-11-03 Thread olsen
yo bonitos due to the pduino rewrite I've to reanimate this threat ;) I would like to remove the ambiguity and confusion about this old and new way of enabling the analog pins. old way of enabling the analog 0 pin is sending the following to the arduino object: [analogIns 0 1( enabling the

Re: [PD] pduino test patch: old analog/digital controls

2011-11-03 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
That confusion originates from the Arduino numbering scheme itself, since it uses A0 for analog pins in analog mode, but then it uses a number when using the same pin for digital things. I think one way to represent this might be to allow the use of A0-A7 pin names in addition to the numbers,

Re: [PD] pduino/comport on osx powerpc freeze

2011-10-28 Thread olsen wolf
Ej Hans Thanks for your reply. It works now - guess the computer arduino just needed some rest... best ø On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 1:10 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: You might want to confirm that its not an electrical problem.  Try another Arduino on that computer. If the

Re: [PD] pduino/comport on osx powerpc freeze

2011-10-28 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Phew. Sounds like it was a short circuit on the arduino board setup. .hc On Oct 28, 2011, at 9:31 AM, olsen wolf wrote: Ej Hans Thanks for your reply. It works now - guess the computer arduino just needed some rest... best ø On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 1:10 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner

[PD] pduino/comport on osx powerpc freeze

2011-10-27 Thread olsen
Buenas I'm currently giving a class using the pduino. One of the students has a Powerpc with OSX 10.04. As soon as he sends a message to the arduino/comport the patch freezes and pd has to be killed. The installed ftdi driver is the current one coming with arduino-022. Anyone experinced

Re: [PD] pduino/comport on osx powerpc freeze

2011-10-27 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
You might want to confirm that its not an electrical problem. Try another Arduino on that computer. If the Arduino shortcircuits, that shuts down the USB connection, which makes Pd crash. .hc On Thursday, October 27, 2011 6:19 PM, olsen sesselastron...@googlemail.com wrote: Buenas I'm

Re: [PD] pduino rewrite

2011-09-16 Thread Roman Haefeli
Wow, I just compared your version of [pd digital message] with mine and yours takes only 180ms to process 100 of messages, while mine uses over 8s. Frankly, I wouldn't have expected such a big difference Let me dig into this. Roman On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 05:57 +0200, Ingo wrote: The

Re: [PD] pduino rewrite

2011-09-16 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 05:57 +0200, Ingo wrote: The [change -1] is a great idea, I just committed that to bytemask.pd and debytemask.pd. But the [pd resolve-bits_0-7] abstractions seem quite labor-intensive, but they work. I think it would work better to use multiple instances of

Re: [PD] pduino rewrite

2011-09-16 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 11:32 +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote: On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 05:57 +0200, Ingo wrote: The [change -1] is a great idea, I just committed that to bytemask.pd and debytemask.pd. But the [pd resolve-bits_0-7] abstractions seem quite labor-intensive, but they work. I think

Re: [PD] pduino rewrite

2011-09-16 Thread Ingo
Wow, I just compared your version of [pd digital message] with mine and yours takes only 180ms to process 100 of messages, while mine uses over 8s. Frankly, I wouldn't have expected such a big difference Let me dig into this. Roman That's more than I would have expected, too! I

Re: [PD] pduino rewrite

2011-09-16 Thread Ingo
Nachricht- Von: Roman Haefeli [mailto:reduz...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Freitag, 16. September 2011 11:32 An: Ingo Cc: 'Hans-Christoph Steiner'; pd-list@iem.at Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: [PD] pduino rewrite On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 05:57 +0200, Ingo wrote: The [change -1] is a great idea, I just

Re: [PD] pduino rewrite

2011-09-16 Thread Ingo
Steiner'; pd-list@iem.at Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: [PD] pduino rewrite On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 14:05 +0200, Ingo wrote: Wow, I just compared your version of [pd digital message] with mine and yours takes only 180ms to process 100 of messages, while mine uses over 8s. Frankly, I

Re: [PD] pduino rewrite

2011-09-16 Thread Claude Heiland-Allen
Hi Ingo, On 16/09/11 13:02, Ingo wrote: When I started I thought it was very convenient to use wireless [send/receive] objects to send midi data to the sample-voices (which it is). [snip] Sending 3,000 messages to 8,000 [receive] objects adds up to 24 million times per second that the

Re: [PD] pduino rewrite

2011-09-16 Thread Ingo
Hi Claude, When I started I thought it was very convenient to use wireless [send/receive] objects to send midi data to the sample-voices (which it is). [snip] Sending 3,000 messages to 8,000 [receive] objects adds up to 24 million times per second that the individual [receive] objects

Re: [PD] pduino rewrite

2011-09-16 Thread Ingo
Nachricht- Von: pd-list-boun...@iem.at [mailto:pd-list-boun...@iem.at] Im Auftrag von Ingo Gesendet: Freitag, 16. September 2011 16:42 An: 'Claude Heiland-Allen'; pd-list@iem.at Betreff: Re: [PD] pduino rewrite Hi Claude, When I started I thought it was very convenient to use

Re: [PD] pduino rewrite

2011-09-15 Thread Roman Haefeli
[mailto:pd-list-boun...@iem.at] Im Auftrag von Hans-Christoph Steiner Gesendet: Mittwoch, 14. September 2011 22:33 An: Roman Haefeli Cc: pd-list@iem.at Betreff: Re: [PD] pduino rewrite As Ingo pointed out, one bug is that [mapping/debytemask] has the [change] object for each outlet. So

Re: [PD] pduino rewrite

2011-09-15 Thread Ingo
Nachricht- Von: Roman Haefeli [mailto:reduz...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. September 2011 08:44 An: Ingo Cc: 'Hans-Christoph Steiner'; pd-list@iem.at Betreff: Re: AW: [PD] pduino rewrite Hi Ingo Thanks for testing! On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 05:23 +0200, Ingo wrote: Hi Roman

Re: [PD] pduino rewrite

2011-09-15 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 09:44 +0200, Ingo wrote: The reason why I didn't make an abstraction for the debyte is that I wanted to keep the number of files and dependencies as low as possible. I think this was the original idea of the rewrite, right? Yeah, exactly. I would like to be able to

Re: [PD] pduino rewrite

2011-09-15 Thread Ingo
Interesting. How did you quantify the amount of message transfers? What makes it differ so much, like you say? I simply (roughly) counted the numbers of objects the calculation including all sub processes have to pass until you get the final result. (Unfortunately I cannot tell how heavy each

Re: [PD] pduino rewrite

2011-09-15 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 10:01 +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote: On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 09:44 +0200, Ingo wrote: The reason why I didn't make an abstraction for the debyte is that I wanted to keep the number of files and dependencies as low as possible. I think this was the original idea of the

Re: [PD] pduino rewrite

2011-09-15 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 10:20 +0200, Ingo wrote: Interesting. How did you quantify the amount of message transfers? What makes it differ so much, like you say? I simply (roughly) counted the numbers of objects the calculation including all sub processes have to pass until you get the final

Re: [PD] pduino rewrite

2011-09-15 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 11:36 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 10:01 +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote: On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 09:44 +0200, Ingo wrote: The reason why I didn't make an abstraction for the debyte is that I wanted to keep the number of files and dependencies

Re: [PD] pduino rewrite

2011-09-15 Thread Ingo
working perfectly. Ingo -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Hans-Christoph Steiner [mailto:h...@at.or.at] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. September 2011 17:48 An: Ingo Cc: 'Roman Haefeli'; pd-list@iem.at Betreff: Re: AW: [PD] pduino rewrite On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 10:20 +0200, Ingo wrote

Re: [PD] pduino rewrite

2011-09-15 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 18:43 +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote: On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 11:36 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 10:01 +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote: On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 09:44 +0200, Ingo wrote: The reason why I didn't make an abstraction for the debyte is

Re: [PD] pduino rewrite

2011-09-15 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. September 2011 17:48 An: Ingo Cc: 'Roman Haefeli'; pd-list@iem.at Betreff: Re: AW: [PD] pduino rewrite On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 10:20 +0200, Ingo wrote: Interesting. How did you quantify the amount of message transfers? What makes it differ so much, like you

Re: [PD] pduino rewrite

2011-09-15 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 13:29 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 18:54 +0200, Ingo wrote: Hi Hans, unfortunately I am not really good at C or C++ so I have to stick with simplifying within Pd until I get there. But I am actually working on it so I'll be able to

Re: [PD] pduino rewrite

2011-09-15 Thread Ingo
The [change -1] is a great idea, I just committed that to bytemask.pd and debytemask.pd. But the [pd resolve-bits_0-7] abstractions seem quite labor-intensive, but they work. I think it would work better to use multiple instances of [debytemask]. .hc Not sure what you mean by

Re: [PD] pduino rewrite

2011-09-14 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hi Ingo Thanks for all your reports. Sorry that my replies sometimes only come a few days later. I'm still willing to fix any outstanding issues, but not very often I find time to get an arduino into my hands. Since sometimes I have troubles following you and keeping your several bug reports

Re: [PD] pduino rewrite

2011-09-14 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 11:48 +0200, Ingo wrote: Hi Roman, thanks for taking the time looking at the code. Unfortunately your version will be sending even many more wrong numbers. I have put some list messages into your patch. Keep clicking onto them randomly and you will see that the

Re: [PD] pduino rewrite

2011-09-14 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
As Ingo pointed out, one bug is that [mapping/debytemask] has the [change] object for each outlet. So probably the way to fix this is to make a bunch of [mapping/debytemask] objects for all the possible digital ports. [arduino] should only output on change of digital input, and it receives the

Re: [PD] pduino rewrite

2011-09-10 Thread Ingo
crazy now sending wrong stuff all over the place. Ingo -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Hans-Christoph Steiner [mailto:h...@at.or.at] Gesendet: Freitag, 9. September 2011 16:41 An: Ingo Cc: 'Roman Haefeli'; 'pd-list' Betreff: Re: [PD] pduino rewrite I basically haven't used

Re: [PD] pduino rewrite

2011-09-10 Thread Ingo
Hi Roman, Olsen and Hans, Here' a replacement object that fixes the behaviour that wrong digital in pins get recognized when more than the first 6 pins are used. I hope there is nothing else interfering with those pins anymore. The object digital_messages inside the patch should be placed here

Re: [PD] pduino rewrite

2011-09-10 Thread Ingo
There is another thing that I just noticed about the pduino test-patch. The mode buttons are suggesting that you can turn of all functions by selecting NONE. This is not true! These buttons have absolutely NO function and should be replaced with the correct commands. While doing this the option

Re: [PD] pduino rewrite

2011-09-09 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hi Ingo On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 05:47 +0200, Ingo wrote: OK, I got it! Downloading the files didn't work (at least not on my Windows computer) but copying the content into a bunch of text files and renaming them did. Hm.. is this probably due to Windows and Linux using different line breaks

Re: [PD] pduino rewrite

2011-09-09 Thread Ingo
Hi Roman, I just messed around with the rewrite and - as you mentioned - you didn't fix any of the bugs. I even think I send you a mail about the digital pins 2 3 and provided a fix for it here at the forum. Of course it's still there! About the other things: - The test patch has still no

Re: [PD] pduino rewrite

2011-09-09 Thread Ingo
I forgot to mention: I tested with a Duemilanove. Ingo -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: pd-list-boun...@iem.at [mailto:pd-list-boun...@iem.at] Im Auftrag von Ingo Gesendet: Freitag, 9. September 2011 10:04 An: 'Roman Haefeli'; 'olsen'; 'pd-list' Betreff: Re: [PD] pduino rewrite Hi

Re: [PD] pduino rewrite

2011-09-09 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 10:03 +0200, Ingo wrote: Hi Roman, I just messed around with the rewrite and - as you mentioned - you didn't fix any of the bugs. I even think I send you a mail about the digital pins 2 3 and provided a fix for it here at the forum. Of course it's still there!

Re: [PD] pduino rewrite

2011-09-09 Thread Ingo
Nachricht- Von: Roman Haefeli [mailto:reduz...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Freitag, 9. September 2011 10:49 An: Ingo Cc: 'olsen'; 'pd-list' Betreff: Re: AW: [PD] pduino rewrite On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 10:03 +0200, Ingo wrote: Hi Roman, I just messed around with the rewrite and - as you mentioned

Re: [PD] pduino rewrite

2011-09-09 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Nachricht- Von: Roman Haefeli [mailto:reduz...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Freitag, 9. September 2011 10:49 An: Ingo Cc: 'olsen'; 'pd-list' Betreff: Re: AW: [PD] pduino rewrite On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 10:03 +0200, Ingo wrote: Hi Roman, I just messed around with the rewrite

Re: [PD] pduino rewrite

2011-09-08 Thread Ingo
I could not open any patch at all! Neither Natty nor Windows XP worked. I am still on Pd-extended 0.42.5. There is a huge list of stuff (not pd library related) missing. So far this doesn't look like it's improving any dependency problem. Ingo buenas tutti roman me did some rewrite on the

Re: [PD] pduino rewrite

2011-09-08 Thread Ingo
are gone. Ingo Betreff: Re: [PD] pduino rewrite I could not open any patch at all! Neither Natty nor Windows XP worked. I am still on Pd-extended 0.42.5. There is a huge list of stuff (not pd library related) missing. So far this doesn't look like it's improving any dependency problem. Ingo

[PD] pduino rewrite

2011-09-02 Thread olsen
buenas tutti roman me did some rewrite on the pduino - citing the README: Pduino - improved - All Pd patches are based on the official Pduino (version 0.5beta8) maintained by Hans-Christoph Steiner. The goals of the improvements are: * Get rid of avoidable dependencies on

Re: [PD] pduino rewrite

2011-09-02 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
This is a great start, it needed some loving. I'll check it out when I have some time. .hc On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 12:20 +0200, olsen wrote: buenas tutti roman me did some rewrite on the pduino - citing the README: Pduino - improved - All Pd patches are based on the

Re: [PD] pduino test patch: old analog/digital controls

2011-06-17 Thread olsen
On 06/17/2011 12:24 AM, Matteo Sisti Sette wrote: On 06/16/2011 05:44 PM, olsen wrote: it's all in the arduino-help.pd by Gerda Strobl and Georg Holzmann! Which one??? Not the one that is distributed together with [arduino] and [arduino-test] at http://at.or.at/hans/pd/objects.html,

Re: [PD] pduino test patch: old analog/digital controls

2011-06-16 Thread olsen
sending wrong data rather than the pd patch doing something wrong. Ingo -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: pd-list-boun...@iem.at [mailto:pd-list-boun...@iem.at] Im Auftrag von Matteo Sisti Sette Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. Juni 2011 16:26 An: Roman Haefeli Cc: 'PD List' Betreff: Re: [PD] pduino

Re: [PD] pduino test patch: old analog/digital controls

2011-06-16 Thread Matteo Sisti Sette
On 06/16/2011 05:44 PM, olsen wrote: it's all in the arduino-help.pd by Gerda Strobl and Georg Holzmann! Which one??? Not the one that is distributed together with [arduino] and [arduino-test] at http://at.or.at/hans/pd/objects.html, right? in the last subpatch [pd SWITCHING-INPUTS]

Re: [PD] pduino test patch: old analog/digital controls

2011-06-14 Thread Matteo Sisti Sette
On 06/13/2011 09:09 PM, Roman Haefeli wrote: @Ingo and Matteo I'm also quite interested in having the [arduino] working properly. I didn't find any bugs recently, though. However, if you provide a step-by-step guide about how to reproduce a problem, I (and probably Olsen also) might be able to

Re: [PD] pduino test patch: old analog/digital controls

2011-06-14 Thread Ingo
An: Roman Haefeli Cc: 'PD List' Betreff: Re: [PD] pduino test patch: old analog/digital controls On 06/13/2011 09:09 PM, Roman Haefeli wrote: @Ingo and Matteo I'm also quite interested in having the [arduino] working properly. I didn't find any bugs recently, though. However, if you provide

Re: [PD] pduino test patch: old analog/digital controls

2011-06-13 Thread matteo sisti sette
Hi, I bring this up again after some further testing: I: In the Pduino test patch (arduino-test.pd) there is a subpatch called old analog/digital controls. ... analogIns X Y (where X is the analog pin to enable/disable and Y is either 0 or 1). Hans-Christoph Steiner: That's the

Re: [PD] pduino test patch: old analog/digital controls

2011-06-13 Thread Ingo
With the latest version, the only way I've found that actually works to enable analog input pins are the so-called old messages analogIns npin 1/0 /listinfo/pd-list I was mentioning that before. I had the same problem. There is another problem with the digital ins 1 and 2. I got myself a

Re: [PD] pduino test patch: old analog/digital controls

2011-06-13 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Jun 13, 2011, at 1:48 PM, Ingo wrote: With the latest version, the only way I've found that actually works to enable analog input pins are the so-called old messages analogIns npin 1/0 /listinfo/pd-list I was mentioning that before. I had the same problem. There is another problem with

Re: [PD] pduino test patch: old analog/digital controls

2011-06-13 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 13:57 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Jun 13, 2011, at 1:48 PM, Ingo wrote: With the latest version, the only way I've found that actually works to enable analog input pins are the so-called old messages analogIns npin 1/0 /listinfo/pd-list I was

Re: [PD] pduino test patch: old analog/digital controls

2011-06-13 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Jun 13, 2011, at 3:09 PM, Roman Haefeli wrote: On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 13:57 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Jun 13, 2011, at 1:48 PM, Ingo wrote: With the latest version, the only way I've found that actually works to enable analog input pins are the so-called old messages

Re: [PD] pduino test patch: old analog/digital controls

2011-05-21 Thread matteo sisti sette
That's the original way of controlling the analog inputs. It just controls whether the Arduino sends the analog messages.  Its there only for backwards compatibility.  Use the non-old messages now. What are the non-old messages? Maybe I should study the firmata documentation instead of just

  1   2   3   >