vincent Rioux a écrit :
thanks IOhannes for being patient.
well, i am still a bit unsure. do you mean that the stuff i described
below canNOT be recorded at all within puredata? i.e. do i have to
make a recording using the ouput of the graphic card?
i am now trying to record a single
On 12/11/06, Patco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be nice if pix_snap worked on winslows
The example patch 07.Snapshot1.pd works on Windows here. What problem do
you have?
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
chris clepper a écrit :
Very simple example of pix_snap and pix_record attached.
The example patch 07.Snapshot1.pd works on Windows here. What problem
do you have?
The attached exemple makes a movie with a black screen, instead of the
nice rotating lined cube.
*snip*
GEM: ver: 0.91-cvs
On 12/11/06, vincent Rioux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanks IOhannes for being patient.
well, i am still a bit unsure. do you mean that the stuff i described
below canNOT be recorded at all within puredata? i.e. do i have to make
a recording using the ouput of the graphic card?
i am now trying
chris clepper a écrit :
On 12/11/06, *Patco* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the 07.Snapshot1.pd example, pd crashes when I click on [snap(,
using pd-0.40-1,
I forgot to tell the hardware,
laptop amd64, graphic card VIA/S3G Unichrome Pro
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, Danks, Mark wrote:
Actually, this one is more complicated, because it involves the
underlying pix buffer. That has nothing to do with OpenGL...
Isn't the situation of the pixes exactly the same as the one of OpenGL ?
That is, that it's all really one big global
On 12/8/06, Mathieu Bouchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:How do i get [separator] to separate colours? I was teaching the use of
[separator] in a workshop and then I realised that it doesn't backup
colours. Is [separator] really only for transformation matrices or is
there an option to enable it
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, chris clepper wrote:
On 12/8/06, Mathieu Bouchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:How do i get [separator] to separate colours? I was teaching the use of
[separator] in a workshop and then I realised that it doesn't backup
colours. Is [separator] really only for transformation
On 12/8/06, Mathieu Bouchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, chris clepper wrote:
On 12/8/06, Mathieu Bouchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:How do i get [separator] to separate colours? I was teaching the use
of
[separator] in a workshop and then I realised that it doesn't backup
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
due to the signal-flow nature of pix-processing you have to add
[pix_record] after all pix-processing objects you want to have an effect
on the recorded video.
that's not very surprising: the same thing would happen to messages and
DSP. (well,
On 12/7/06, Mathieu Bouchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what's a lot more surprising is that
[pix_video]
|
[pix_gain]
|
[t a a]
| |
| [pix_invert]
|
[pix_record]
actually applies [pix_invert], because gem messages handle pix (and all
the other state) by pointer, so that the pix
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of chris clepper
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 10:07 AM
To: Mathieu Bouchard
Cc: pd-liste; vincent Rioux; IOhannes m zmoelnig
Subject: Re: [PD] pix_record mixed pixes
On 12/7/06, Mathieu Bouchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On 12/7/06, Danks, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reversing the order pix_invert and pix_record will still apply the
invert…it will just happen after the pix_record happens.
That is a much clearer way to say what I was try to say. The inversion will
not be applied to the image input to
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 01:00:04PM -0600, chris clepper wrote:
On 12/7/06, Danks, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reversing the order pix_invert and pix_record will still apply the
invert?it will just happen after the pix_record happens.
That is a much clearer way to say what I was try to
Bouchard; pd-liste; vincent Rioux; IOhannes m
zmoelnig
Subject: Re: [PD] pix_record mixed pixes
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 01:00:04PM -0600, chris clepper wrote:
On 12/7/06, Danks, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reversing the order pix_invert and pix_record will still apply
the
invert
On 12/7/06, Chris McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess one way to 'fix' that (and break backwards compatability) would
be perform a GLPushMatrix every time there is a fork in the graph,
and a GLPopMatrix every time you get to a leaf node.
That's just doing the same thing as the
dear list,
I recently tried out pix_record object of Gem, running pd-39.2-extended
for osx.
It worked pretty fine but i could not record anything else than a video
connected to a unique gemhead.
i tried to mix several pixes (like moving rectangles with alpha layer)
with the video using
vincent Rioux wrote:
dear list,
I recently tried out pix_record object of Gem, running pd-39.2-extended
for osx.
It worked pretty fine but i could not record anything else than a video
connected to a unique gemhead.
i tried to mix several pixes (like moving rectangles with alpha layer)
On 12/6/06, Kyle Klipowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've never explored this object, but it sounds great! There's a way to
capture openGL to pix objects right? So pix_record could be used to record
an entire GEM session to a video file?
Put pix_snap in front of pix_record. Don't expect a
19 matches
Mail list logo
