Re: [PD] polygate~, demux~ mux~, mtx_*~

2013-07-28 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Sam, 2013-07-27 at 18:08 -0400, pured...@11h11.com wrote: hi, i need to route 1 to x x to 1 audio signal. demux~ (demultiplex~ on pd-extended) and mux~ are doing exactly that, but when switching using a number box = glitch. polygate~ have a fade option that avoid this glitch but

[PD] polygate~, demux~ mux~, mtx_*~

2013-07-27 Thread puredata
hi, i need to route 1 to x x to 1 audio signal. demux~ (demultiplex~ on pd-extended) and mux~ are doing exactly that, but when switching using a number box = glitch. polygate~ have a fade option that avoid this glitch but there's no couterpart (like unpolygate~) and finally mtx_*~ on

Re: [PD] polygate~, demux~ mux~, mtx_*~

2013-07-27 Thread Alexandros Drymonitis
[mtx_*~] is part of the iemmatrix library. On Pd-extended on my mac I also can't create [mtx_*~], but [mtx_mul~] using [import iemmatrix]. I think [mtx_mul~] should be deprecated, but it works on Pd-extended-0.43 (I think, the latest version from puredata.info). On my Linux I have Pd-0.44.3

Re: [PD] polygate~, demux~ mux~, mtx_*~

2013-07-27 Thread João Pais
I would advise using mtx_mul~ instead of that. Also, I did an abstraction called matrixctrl some weeks ago that works just like its max/msp counterpart. Can't search for a link now, but you should be able to find it easily in the list archives. 2013/7/28 pured...@11h11.com hi, i need to