Re: [PD] pow~ question

2013-10-28 Thread peiman khosravi 
Sure thing. I wanted to make sure that it's a bug before reporting it.

Thanks,
Peiman




*www.peimankhosravi.co.uk || RSS
Feed ||
Concert News *


On 28 October 2013 16:59, IOhannes m zmoelnig  wrote:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 2013-10-28 17:36, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
> > There has been a patch on the tracker for this since February:
> > http://sourceforge.net/p/pure-data/patches/499/
> >
> > Since it describes both the problem and the solution I see no
> > reason why you should waste your time re-reporting the problem.
> >
>
> nobody requested that. if a bug is already reported, simply add a
> message that states that you can confirm the bug ("me too").
>
> if you encounter a problem, you might even check the bug-tracker
> before reporting it somewhere else (in some cases you might notice,
> that the bug has already been fixed!).
> (but personally i'm fine if you post a problem here first; just don't
> get pissed off if somebody - like me - tells you to use the bug-tracker)
>
> fgmasdr
> IOhannes
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJSbpf8AAoJELZQGcR/ejb4qs8P/R51IC02nAgCuHORzhcV9ThM
> F1kLico1/ZXThHyz0oNL34zdxMqWX4Y/u5iSmhi917qFK+GNofaxVC3alTpL+BMw
> UgpTk3X9Auw5xZVGGLJwGkN9Qk/xOxjFJkxozJEazlBEzN/u0byxmofHIwwrYSKO
> yElBdWLhB9Xxvk+n9JRKw84ABHyMZ4H8Jcz5uWh4dxVPuMgwT7cokDL8DRnUwSEc
> 4LmPVZfEy3LZk9jDZe0QHkF3wjIKbTzonce25y3oonsXi4qFNZ00afMzSPt0WMm2
> oKetOdKNronzRQoQhIiVgCBz7fK7atGttPV6K8GrXzVouWyf5so6wXOgRVxhECDY
> XtxQ+b49ChgFnot14iD0+I3cc1Ujwr+HL4sPoanQH4ebwMYPoP8q4YPEl65mt3yS
> 3OKn0oD7Nb2Zs92CkUc7oF4aQkjwI/kdGngbuOWYBaLKpN+pmx7zZ38uVE+LHYNo
> VehCY2Kd0xpIFmPUlmc5nXhAwhnYhev3h+YjcFPfxmKQSvz1TNGqA4mSnwfW912x
> 29FDBFLL7fsJMI/3fGuGZe5W+y+PkmJSQLwnXcm3KdJ/57yE1hWoPrVofOrh9vRU
> wcQh7+hH0Lb8wWSexU37cbbUgfjgU43b8cYXnTOYojImZbK1fi4FnW8nLiOrvG+c
> usO7ZTd8FxLILZ/bwNDF
> =RysT
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
> ___
> Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] pow~ question

2013-10-28 Thread peiman khosravi 
OK thanks,

I'm on os x but this is hardly a crippling issue! loadbang and a message
box will do for now.

Thanks
Peiman




*www.peimankhosravi.co.uk || RSS
Feed<http://peimankhosravi.co.uk/miscposts.rss> ||
Concert News <http://spectralkimia.wordpress.com/>*


On 28 October 2013 16:36, Jonathan Wilkes  wrote:

> There has been a patch on the tracker for this since February:
> http://sourceforge.net/p/pure-data/patches/499/
>
> Since it describes both the problem and the solution I see no reason why
> you should waste your time re-reporting the problem.
>
> If you use Ubuntu I'd suggest using Pd-l2ork:
> http://l2ork.music.vt.edu/main/?page_id=56
>
>
> Best,
> Jonathan
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: IOhannes m zmoelnig 
> To: pd-list@iem.at
> Cc:
> Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 5:09 AM
> Subject: Re: [PD] pow~ question
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 2013-10-28 10:00, peiman khosravi wrote:
> > According to the help patch, the argument of pow~ should initiate
> > the right inlet, but it doesn't seem to work.
>
> according to the source-code, [pow~] simply ignores any creation
> arguments (which explains why you don't get what you expect)
>
> pleas file a bug-report at http://bugs.puredata.info/
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJSbimrAAoJELZQGcR/ejb4998QAJbUXWRcIzAbrzepiQUZTzj3
> GLNtGWFLG4JgJEmjemDZpWp7yhHrzB6meaIxX+F/GFXrzv5/CSzD/C/iJgyUjM3k
> zscXNg8xYil8vhKHjx+pcxB+8kHiDHkNQ9BoL2nKkD9+w9mjc5TY3ILW3VpoV5Fb
> BR6lSrM7OjnPXy+Kr/k5XyYJUY540zkr1ImsYajADHegkb9NXwmbkVAtQ3LQbCPo
> A3KjFgm4THtQgR6rvCr6i4KL8u2cXspn8bclGnt6HKsUd1mBpQzBoPRUV2qIpndl
> hT0sEwImnmtWAC6Z/hjU0Lwsir7nbCtsi3xNtjbTBdfOsXCIatKSaPfhS2bDILWk
> 35VXosjB2g4JpSbU+OQjSQgOOM7Ly1PpdXtLRzVSEpCwDCyjy8cRZKfXv4iYceg2
> ma3Xa+upe04xZwy3PIEWaMsIyjeTzl+SFH8MgLIc3XmCewgvINKFnWF5AEVbHRNh
> ZjbNByn7oN0a+6gbsBLnzKmPhw5hs6sPCeaCyuSMFgQdJBrsJqkE5X8SQu3/Xytj
> tsznJWInevIZyuevUB7QgAWyE7RcH6js+TK4jbrkxBys4PXngZYOI7sR2RwEPNG7
> RRSTC8TPffXQfgwFEo36bi1z55pYVrdA7Ap8PyFnKRL7aNKTKJJ1lvAMN679DmYX
> oJpBnR57n5zwPmdyxoYf
> =wyjI
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
>
> ___
> Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
> ___
> Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] pow~ question

2013-10-28 Thread Jonathan Wilkes 

On 10/28/2013 12:59 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

On 2013-10-28 17:36, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:

There has been a patch on the tracker for this since February:
http://sourceforge.net/p/pure-data/patches/499/

Since it describes both the problem and the solution I see no
reason why you should waste your time re-reporting the problem.


nobody requested that. if a bug is already reported, simply add a
message that states that you can confirm the bug ("me too").


That's also a waste of the user's time.  It's not going to add anything 
of value to what's already there.




if you encounter a problem, you might even check the bug-tracker
before reporting it somewhere else (in some cases you might notice,
that the bug has already been fixed!).


Yes, the first thing one should do before posting on the list is to 
check the tracker for bugs/patches/feature requests.


-Jonathan


(but personally i'm fine if you post a problem here first; just don't
get pissed off if somebody - like me - tells you to use the bug-tracker)

fgmasdr
IOhannes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=RysT
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list





___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] pow~ question

2013-10-28 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

On 2013-10-28 17:36, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
> There has been a patch on the tracker for this since February: 
> http://sourceforge.net/p/pure-data/patches/499/
> 
> Since it describes both the problem and the solution I see no
> reason why you should waste your time re-reporting the problem.
> 

nobody requested that. if a bug is already reported, simply add a
message that states that you can confirm the bug ("me too").

if you encounter a problem, you might even check the bug-tracker
before reporting it somewhere else (in some cases you might notice,
that the bug has already been fixed!).
(but personally i'm fine if you post a problem here first; just don't
get pissed off if somebody - like me - tells you to use the bug-tracker)

fgmasdr
IOhannes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=RysT
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] pow~ question

2013-10-28 Thread Jonathan Wilkes 
There has been a patch on the tracker for this since February:
http://sourceforge.net/p/pure-data/patches/499/

Since it describes both the problem and the solution I see no reason why you 
should waste your time re-reporting the problem.

If you use Ubuntu I'd suggest using Pd-l2ork:
http://l2ork.music.vt.edu/main/?page_id=56


Best,
Jonathan


- Original Message -
From: IOhannes m zmoelnig 
To: pd-list@iem.at
Cc: 
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 5:09 AM
Subject: Re: [PD] pow~ question

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

On 2013-10-28 10:00, peiman khosravi wrote:
> According to the help patch, the argument of pow~ should initiate
> the right inlet, but it doesn't seem to work.

according to the source-code, [pow~] simply ignores any creation
arguments (which explains why you don't get what you expect)

pleas file a bug-report at http://bugs.puredata.info/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=wyjI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] pow~ question

2013-10-28 Thread Funs Seelen 
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 10:00 AM, peiman khosravi
wrote:

> According to the help patch, the argument of pow~ should initiate the
> right inlet, but it doesn't seem to work. (Please see the attached patch.)
>
>
[sig~] does accept creation arguments. That's a workaround.
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] pow~ question

2013-10-28 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

On 2013-10-28 10:00, peiman khosravi wrote:
> According to the help patch, the argument of pow~ should initiate
> the right inlet, but it doesn't seem to work.

according to the source-code, [pow~] simply ignores any creation
arguments (which explains why you don't get what you expect)

pleas file a bug-report at http://bugs.puredata.info/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=wyjI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

[PD] pow~ question

2013-10-28 Thread peiman khosravi 
According to the help patch, the argument of pow~ should initiate the right
inlet, but it doesn't seem to work. (Please see the attached patch.)

Best,
Peiman

*www.peimankhosravi.co.uk || RSS
Feed ||
Concert News *


testPow~.pd
Description: Binary data
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list