Quoting Michael Zacherl sdiy-m...@blauwurf.info:
Although I'm subscribed to all Pd-lists I almost missed some
interesting discussion on Pd-OT (hey Ed! ).
I just had a look only because you mentioned that.
Just out of an impulse I'd like to suggest to close this OT-list and
simply follow
OK, it all makes sense, I just thought some list members might get tired of
reading 100 messages about the RPi. But yes, it might just as well go back
to normal in a few days (though in my case I seriously doubt it :) ).
Cheers,
Pierre.
2012/8/19 zmoel...@iem.at
Quoting Michael Zacherl
On 08/17/2012 08:46 AM, Pierre Massat wrote:
Just a thought : wouldn't it be useful to create a pd-raspberr...@iem.at
mailto:pd-raspberr...@iem.at address ? I get the feeling that there
will be more and more messages about this new platform which may not
necessarily be interesting to pure Pd
On 18.8.2012, at 21:00 , IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
On 08/17/2012 08:46 AM, Pierre Massat wrote:
Just a thought : wouldn't it be useful to create a pd-raspberr...@iem.at
mailto:pd-raspberr...@iem.at address ? I get the feeling that there
will be more and more messages about this new platform
On 18.8.2012, at 21:00 , IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
- in retrospect i consider it a mistake to have split the pd-ot list from
pd-list: in 2012 we have a total of about 22 mails on that list (so it's
virtually unused), whereas there are still [OT] mails on Pd-list, and i
don't see a real
