Re: [PD] reverb in pd

2011-08-20 Thread JF
out there to my ears, free or not! John. --- On Wed, 17/8/11, William Brent william.br...@gmail.com wrote: From: William Brent william.br...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PD] reverb in pd To: chris clepper cgclep...@gmail.com Cc: saint sainti...@yahoo.com, pd list pd-list@iem.at Date: Wednesday

Re: [PD] reverb in pd

2011-08-17 Thread William Brent
Sorry to resurrect this old thread, but I downloaded these IRs when they were available and am wondering if they're definitely 100% free and open for any use. I have students that would want to work with them, but don't want to officially recommend that and pass the .zip on unless I can be sure

Re: [PD] reverb in pd

2011-08-17 Thread chris clepper
They did not have permission to make those IRs, but Casey from Bricasti informally said they were fine to use since they are not really close to the actual unit. Static IRs don't capture the modulation and randomization in high end reverb units (Lexicon PCM, Eventide, Bricasti) so you don't get

Re: [PD] reverb in pd

2011-08-17 Thread William Brent
All good to know - thanks for the response! On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 3:08 PM, chris clepper cgclep...@gmail.com wrote: They did not have permission to make those IRs, but Casey from Bricasti informally said they were fine to use since they are not really close to the actual unit.  Static IRs

Re: [PD] reverb in pd

2010-10-25 Thread Pierre Massat
://www.ludd.luth.se/~torger/brutefir.html#bruteconvhttp://www.ludd.luth.se/%7Etorger/brutefir.html#bruteconv I hope that Bricasti link worked for you! Cheers, John. --- On Thu, 21/10/10, Pierre Massat pimas...@gmail.com wrote: From: Pierre Massat pimas...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PD] reverb in pd

Re: [PD] reverb in pd

2010-10-24 Thread saint
: From: Pierre Massat pimas...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PD] reverb in pd To: saint sainti...@yahoo.com Cc: pd list pd-list@iem.at Date: Thursday, 21 October, 2010, 21:04 This is awesome! Strickly so. Thanks! How does partitioned convolution work? Pierre 2010/10/21 saint sainti...@yahoo.com +1

Re: [PD] reverb in pd

2010-10-21 Thread saint
+1 on ben saylor's partconv~ - works excellently. arm yourself with the free acousticas IR's... http://www.acousticas.net/World/IRs/AcousticasM7.zip of the $3,500 bricasti m7 unit... http://www.bricasti.com/m7.html ...and you'll not go back to algorithmic reverbs again. or just get some

Re: [PD] reverb in pd

2010-10-21 Thread Pierre Massat
This is awesome! Strickly so. Thanks! How does partitioned convolution work? Pierre 2010/10/21 saint sainti...@yahoo.com +1 on ben saylor's partconv~ - works excellently. arm yourself with the free acousticas IR's... http://www.acousticas.net/World/IRs/AcousticasM7.zip of the $3,500

[PD] reverb in pd

2010-10-20 Thread ronni montoya
Hello, i was trying freeverb in pd and i dont like how it sounds. I was wondering if there are any other reverb objects or externals that sound better. Any idea? Thanks R. ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -

Re: [PD] reverb in pd

2010-10-20 Thread Lorenzo Sutton
ronni montoya wrote: Hello, i was trying freeverb in pd and i dont like how it sounds. I was wondering if there are any other reverb objects or externals that sound better. Any idea? I find [rev2~] and [rev3~] in extended pretty interesting. If you're on linux and have ladspa C* JVRev is also

Re: [PD] reverb in pd

2010-10-20 Thread Paulo Casaes
There's Ben Saylor's partconv~ which does some fancy convolving. It's in the browser in PD-Extended. p On 20/10/2010 09:26, Lorenzo Sutton wrote: ronni montoya wrote: Hello, i was trying freeverb in pd and i dont like how it sounds. I was wondering if there are any other reverb objects or

Re: [PD] reverb in pd

2010-10-20 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010, ronni montoya wrote: Hello, i was trying freeverb in pd and i dont like how it sounds. I was wondering if there are any other reverb objects or externals that sound better. Any idea? I'm still pretty much just using [delread~] and [vd~], with multipliers like [*~ 0.95]

Re: [PD] reverb in pd

2010-10-20 Thread Matthew Logan
I like Anton Hörnquist's [jon~], a reverb abstraction based on the algorithm in this article by Jon Dattorro: http://www.stanford.edu/~dattorro/EffectDesignPart1.pdf IMO, it is easy to use and sounds very good. Here's the link: http://www.hornquist.se/pd/jon Matt Logan On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at

Re: [PD] reverb in pd

2010-10-20 Thread Claude Heiland-Allen
On 20/10/10 16:20, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: On Wed, 20 Oct 2010, ronni montoya wrote: Hello, i was trying freeverb in pd and i dont like how it sounds. I was wondering if there are any other reverb objects or externals that sound better. Any idea? I'm still pretty much just using [delread~]