Hi,
I didn't found an equivalent to max external selector~ , I made this
ugly abstraction for 3 inputs but I wonder if there is something more
standard and that can accept argument to set the number of inputs.
is there one?
I used 'mixer~' which is ggee to do it, so there maybe some way
Loic Kessous a écrit :
Hi,
I didn't found an equivalent to max external selector~ , I made this
ugly abstraction for 3 inputs but I wonder if there is something more
standard and that can accept argument to set the number of inputs.
is there one?
not in vanilla.
i made a smaller
Loic Kessous wrote:
Hi,
I didn't found an equivalent to max external selector~ , I made this
ugly abstraction for 3 inputs but I wonder if there is something more
standard and that can accept argument to set the number of inputs.
is there one?
I used 'mixer~' which is ggee to do it, so
Hi Loic,
I was also going to say use [mux~] and [demux~], but then I see [mux~]
in your patch already... The problem with asking which Pd object is
like this Max object? is that many of us have never used Max. If you
could describe in plain text what the function you want is, maybe we can
Derek Holzer wrote:
Hi Loic,
I was also going to say use [mux~] and [demux~], but then I see [mux~]
in your patch already...
you are probably looking at my patch (with [mux~]) rather than loic's
patch (without it)
The problem with asking which Pd object is
like this Max object? is that
Ah yes, ooops! Another reason to write things in plain text, attachments
can be problematic ;-)
D.
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
I was also going to say use [mux~] and [demux~], but then I see [mux~]
in your patch already...
you are probably looking at my patch (with [mux~]) rather than
On 14 sept. 09, at 11:41, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Derek Holzer wrote:
Hi Loic,
I was also going to say use [mux~] and [demux~], but then I see
[mux~] in your patch already...
you are probably looking at my patch (with [mux~]) rather than
loic's patch (without it)
The problem with
