Re: [PD] writesf~ time to flush to disk…?

2013-10-02 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2013-10-01 18:47, Dan Wilcox wrote: Speaking of bangs doing the job, I wish [tabread] had a right outlet that banged when you gave it an out of bound index. I was trying to make a vanilla version of [tabdump] and that would allow me to know

Re: [PD] writesf~ time to flush to disk…?

2013-10-01 Thread Thomas Mayer
Hi, On 30.09.2013 17:22, Jamie Bullock wrote: Hi folks, The documentation for writesf~ states that: You need not provide any disk access time between open and start, but between stop and the next open you must give the object time to flush all the output to disk This

Re: [PD] writesf~ time to flush to disk…?

2013-10-01 Thread Jamie Bullock
On 1 Oct 2013, at 09:27, Thomas Mayer tho...@residuum.org wrote: On 30.09.2013 17:22, Jamie Bullock wrote: Could an outlet be added to writesf~, outputing the number of samples written to disk? The parent patch could then use this outlet to establish when writesf~ is ready to receive

Re: [PD] writesf~ time to flush to disk…?

2013-10-01 Thread Dan Wilcox
, 2013, at 6:00 PM, pd-list-requ...@iem.at wrote: From: Jamie Bullock ja...@jamiebullock.com Subject: Re: [PD] writesf~ time to flush to disk…? Date: October 1, 2013 5:26:49 PM GMT+08:00 To: Thomas Mayer tho...@residuum.org Cc: pd-list@iem.at On 1 Oct 2013, at 09:27, Thomas Mayer tho

[PD] writesf~ time to flush to disk…?

2013-09-30 Thread Jamie Bullock
Hi folks, The documentation for writesf~ states that: You need not provide any disk access time between open and start, but between stop and the next open you must give the object time to flush all the output to disk This suggests that once writesf~ has received a stop after writing