Well, you can peruse the tracker's open patches to get a sense of whether you
can (or if it's worth your time to try). Keep in mind the Pd-l2ork gui prefs
code started out as a patch specifically written as a clean, small patch to get
into Vanilla/Extended.
-Jonathan
On Tuesday, Decembe
Hi Gavin,
> My Moto G doesn't report a unique network id for some reason.
This is a fairly critical bug. The protocol won't behave well if a node
is lacking a uid. After looking at the uid object I think this could
happen if a device lacks the "loopback" interface 127.0.0.1 - so I've
changed the
Upon getting a new 13” Retina Macbook, I have started to notice glitching in
the PD UI. I thought this might signal a need to upgrade to Pd-extended 0.43.4,
so I did, but this did not fix the glitching. Usually, the glitching manifests
as a flickering GUI slider, but sometimes, a whole squarish
Sorry, I didn;t mean to sound like I'm griping. The nature of the question
was more "if we apply clean, small patches to vanilla, could we get some of
Han's updates in so they aren't lost to non Pd-l2ork users". I'm in the
middle of writing my thesis right now, but getting into real Pd development
On 12/16/2014 03:12 PM, Dan Wilcox wrote:
I like how I explicitly asked to not hear that "Pd-l2ork has that" and
yet that's the response I got. I already knew this anyway from the
sample screenshots you were posting when you were implementing it.
(Looks great BTW)
Yeah, I know, it was 100% wi
I like how I explicitly asked to not hear that "Pd-l2ork has that" and yet
that's the response I got. I already knew this anyway from the sample
screenshots you were posting when you were implementing it. (Looks great
BTW)
Also, if you didn't know, why respond? :P
On 12/15/2014 06:21 PM, Dan Wil
Hi,
While maintaining lots of patches, one thinks of automation. To
understand the pd-patch better and exercise my Tcl-coding, I made a pd
patch parser. Currently it only lists the objects with their number and
a number for the (sub-)patch they are in.
The plan was to make a streaming pd-editor t
This is caused when you make a patch in 0.45 or later, make some object have
non-default text width, and then open it in an eralier version of Pd (such
as extended, which is 0.43). It shouldn't hurt anything (but will lose the
formatting information). If you save in the older version of Pd the "f
hi,
i know it's been on the list before,
but googling didn't give me anything.
the change log for Pd Vanilla did not help either.
i (think to) know it's caused by an extra parameter for some object
but which object?
for me it's necessary to be able to run my patch in Pd 42.5.
thanks in advan
>> On Tuesday, December 16, 2014 8:47 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig
wrote:
>>
>> oh, but that is just trivial:
>>
Le 16 déc. 2014 à 16:59, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list
a écrit :
>>
>> But if it were truly "trivial" then [trigger] wouldn't exist.
On 12/16/2014 05:06 PM, Jma/celeonet wrote:
> On my side
On 2014-12-15 22:46, Miller Puckette wrote:
> Just FYI…. Joe Deken of newblankets.org is considering making a repository
> of external objects compatible with Pd vanilla. I think almost all the
> objects in Pd extended will work with vanilla (and if I find out what
> specific changes vanilla woul
Hi Alexandre,
> seems like a mistake
>
> I don't have Max 5, but in Max 6 it's pretty clear it's only 3, and in
> cyclone, for what I see, i'ts also only 3, right?
Yes, the object code only uses three arguments.
>
> I've seen some typos and misleading things in Max's documentation
> before, it
On my side i would not say it is exactly trivial
JmAdrien
> Le 16 déc. 2014 à 16:59, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list a
> écrit :
>
> That's definitely a workable solution.
>
> But if it were truly "trivial" then [trigger] wouldn't exist.
>
> -Jonathan
>
>
> On Tuesday, December 16, 2014 8:47 A
That's definitely a workable solution.
But if it were truly "trivial" then [trigger] wouldn't exist.
-Jonathan
On Tuesday, December 16, 2014 8:47 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig
wrote:
On 12/15/2014 11:53 PM, Raphaël Ilias wrote:
> Ok, I get the trick, it seems similar to the one used to ma
nevermind, I thought it was for feedback, but I see what it looks like now
2014-12-16 13:04 GMT-02:00 Alexandre Torres Porres :
>
> > seems similar to the one used to make delay line
> > shorter than one block.
>
> and how is that trick? :)
>
> 2014-12-16 11:41 GMT-02:00 IOhannes m zmölnig :
>>
> seems similar to the one used to make delay line
> shorter than one block.
and how is that trick? :)
2014-12-16 11:41 GMT-02:00 IOhannes m zmölnig :
>
> On 12/15/2014 11:53 PM, Raphaël Ilias wrote:
> > Ok, I get the trick, it seems similar to the one used to make delay line
> > shorter than
On 12/15/2014 11:53 PM, Raphaël Ilias wrote:
> Ok, I get the trick, it seems similar to the one used to make delay line
> shorter than one block.
> However, I still feel that an object "give-me-RMS enveloppe-on-bang" (for
> the last N samples or blocks) would appear to me an easier way to handle
>
17 matches
Mail list logo
