Re: [PD] Enable autopatch by default Pd-extended 0.43.4

2015-02-26 Thread JF via Pd-list
Thanks Iohannes, I forgot that extended was 'behind' and that autopatch is relatively new. I'm back patching on vanilla now, and having extended installed alongside is handy to go exploring externals and documentation. On Thursday, 26 February 2015, 15:49, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:

Re: [PD] bandlimited wavetables for pd vanilla

2015-02-26 Thread Claude Heiland-Allen
On 13/02/15 11:19, Claude Heiland-Allen wrote: On 13/02/15 10:32, Roman Haefeli wrote: I'll do some tests later today (but if you want to get there first the ramp is somewhere in "bl-gen-abs~.pd", perhaps try making it 1 all the way to SR/2). 2 weeks later, I finally got around to it... I trie

Re: [PD] Enable autopatch by default Pd-extended 0.43.4

2015-02-26 Thread Alexandros Drymonitis
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 8:45 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > On 02/26/2015 04:49 PM, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote: > > Strange... I know it's enabled by default on Vanilla, plus it's mentioned > > in the page you posted. But there's no -noautopatch to disable that > > feature, so what's the meanin

Re: [PD] Enable autopatch by default Pd-extended 0.43.4

2015-02-26 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
On 02/26/2015 04:49 PM, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote: > Strange... I know it's enabled by default on Vanilla, plus it's mentioned > in the page you posted. But there's no -noautopatch to disable that > feature, so what's the meaning of having this flag since it's there by > default and you can't dis

Re: [PD] Enable autopatch by default Pd-extended 0.43.4

2015-02-26 Thread Alexandros Drymonitis
Strange... I know it's enabled by default on Vanilla, plus it's mentioned in the page you posted. But there's no -noautopatch to disable that feature, so what's the meaning of having this flag since it's there by default and you can't disable it? On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:48 PM, JF wrote: > htt

Re: [PD] Enable autopatch by default Pd-extended 0.43.4

2015-02-26 Thread JF via Pd-list
http://puredata.info/docs/faq/commandline   Maybe the flag is Vanilla only. I'm coming from Vanilla and I'm very used to autopatch as it's default there. Thanks Alexandros though. Does anyone else know if this is possible? It's really infuriating me! On Thursday, 26 February 2015, 10:18, A

Re: [PD] Enable autopatch by default Pd-extended 0.43.4

2015-02-26 Thread Alexandros Drymonitis
Not sure if there's such a flag, but also since you have to active autopatch for every single window separately (including subpatches) I guess that's not really possible On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:03 AM, JF via Pd-list wrote: > I've tried putting '-autopatch' and also tried '--autopatch' in

[PD] Enable autopatch by default Pd-extended 0.43.4

2015-02-26 Thread JF via Pd-list
I've tried putting '-autopatch' and also tried '--autopatch' in Preferences->Startup flags but to no avail? Is this possible? Thanks in advance,John. ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/

Re: [PD] knowing if there's anything connected to an [inlet~] in a subpatch or abstraction

2015-02-26 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-02-25 18:23, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > I'm actually interested in knowing whether there's a signal > connected to the inlet of an abstraction. > > I need it so I can automatically switch between the argument loaded > in the abstractio