Hi Chris,I see that method in Pd-l2ork, which still has a lot of code before
the 0.43rewrite. It is absent in Pd-Vanilla 0.46, but maybe it was replaced
with"menunew"
I don't think either of those are meant to be used directly by the user, but
youcan give it a shot.
-Jonathan
On Wed
Hello list!
I've been working a lot with internal messages in the past few days to
dynamically create patches. I noticed when switching from pd-extended to
vanilla that sending "filename example.pd /path/to/file" to [s pd] gives me
an error: "pd: unknown message filename example.pd /path/to/file".
2015-09-23 8:08 GMT-03:00 Christof Ressi :
> Alexandre, it's cool that you're out on 'bug hunt', however, on some
> things you could take a little more time to figure out if things are really
> a bug or just mistakes on our own.
>
well, never said this particular thing was a "bug", I just have a
yeah, the patch I mentioned, is here
2015-09-23 11:34 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Torres Porres :
> well, in my test in the attached patch, the delrwrite is at 4000 size, and
> delread will read all the way up there instead of only to about 1000 as vd~
> does
>
> I'd like to see your test please, as I do
well, in my test in the attached patch, the delrwrite is at 4000 size, and
delread will read all the way up there instead of only to about 1000 as vd~
does
I'd like to see your test please, as I dont know what to say, looks to me
it is different. I didn't create a second thread cause I thought tha
Thanks for the hint, Johnny, splitting automatically the videos is a
interesting idea, and I'll use it if Iwant to access specifics moments in
time. In my last project the point in time was determinated depending on
people's movement, but I accessed to it in a continuous way, passing
through ever
Alexandre, it's cool that you're out on 'bug hunt', however, on some things you could take a little more time to figure out if things are really a bug or just mistakes on our own.
You're wondering why the 'back' [print~] starts with 2111? The first 64 samples are from a previous block. Then from
> vd~ will have that issue where you need to divide the time in ms for the overlap number -
> which I think is bad and maybe it should just work around that. It's really annoying working with a different time range.
> now, delread~ doesn't need that, you can work with the actual ms
That's n
Hi
Following up the thread about the DSP recompilation internals, it's even
clearer that there are sometimes good reasons to do a 'dsp 0, dsp 1'
cycle to force DSP graph recompilation, for instance to apply it only
once when it would otherwise occur many times.
Unfortunately, depending on the cur
