2017-03-03 19:20 GMT-03:00 Roman Haefeli :
> After putting deken-plugin.tcl into extra/, don't you see a message from
> Deken in the Pd-console when you start Pd?
>
no, I don't
> I must assume you downloaded deken-plugin.tcl by copy from browser
> to Microsoft Word and
On Fre, 2017-03-03 at 18:55 -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
>
>
> 2017-03-03 18:36 GMT-03:00 Roman Haefeli :
> >
> > Follow my instructions.
> I did, quite carefully, didn't work as I said, I also did other stuff
> that I described, and didn't work as well.
Please be
2017-03-03 18:36 GMT-03:00 Roman Haefeli :
>
> Follow my instructions.
>
I did, quite carefully, didn't work as I said, I also did other stuff that
I described, and didn't work as well.
___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
thanks roman for the detailed instructions (and the patience).
that's exactly how it's meant to be.
On 03/03/2017 10:36 PM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> Both can co-exist just fine. The one in extra/ has precedence
> over the included one.
just a small amendment here: the one in extra/ *only* has
Hey Alex
On Fre, 2017-03-03 at 18:19 -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
>
>
> 2017-03-03 17:32 GMT-03:00 Roman Haefeli :
> >
> > No, you just need to put it into a search path of Pd. If your goal
> > is
> > to test whether the most recent change works (creation of the
2017-03-03 17:32 GMT-03:00 Roman Haefeli :
>
> No, you just need to put it into a search path of Pd. If your goal is
> to test whether the most recent change works (creation of the user
> specific folder), then you obviously can't use that, you may put it
> into the
On Don, 2017-03-02 at 20:22 -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
>
>
> 2017-03-02 19:17 GMT-03:00 IOhannes m zmölnig :
> >
> > for starters, you could just follow the instructions on
> > https://github.com/pure-data/deken/#download
> I had done that, but downloading
2017-03-03 9:45 GMT-03:00 :
> please keep the clarity of 0.0-extended version name.
Hi, I got your message separate from the others and missed it for a while,
in another thread, I'm responding here so it's in the same thread for me...
Can you explain what you think is "clear"
2017-03-03 6:01 GMT-03:00 :
>
> machine readable format?
>
please explain what is and what do you mean by "machine readable format"?
2017-03-03 6:01 GMT-03:00 :
> On 03-03-17 07:42, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
>
> could just be "0.0.1" or something.
>
>
2017-03-03 10:54 GMT-03:00 Fred Jan Kraan :
> On 03-03-17 07:42, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
>
> could just be "0.0.1" or something. The one thing I dont get is tof, I
>> couldn't find the version, but there's a new one in deken as 0.2.1,
>> maybe call it 0.2 then? But I
On Fre, 2017-03-03 at 08:35 -0500, Martin Peach wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 4:55 AM, Roman Haefeli
> wrote:
>
> > * Wouldn't it be good if there'd be some 'report' message that
> > would
> > trigger a dump of the current inner state, like 'xonxoff 0,
> > stopbit
> >
On 03-03-17 07:42, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
could just be "0.0.1" or something. The one thing I dont get is tof, I
couldn't find the version, but there's a new one in deken as 0.2.1,
maybe call it 0.2 then? But I wonder how that version name came up...
here's tof's git
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 4:55 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> * Wouldn't it be good if there'd be some 'report' message that would
>trigger a dump of the current inner state, like 'xonxoff 0, stopbit
>2, parity 0' etc.
>
>
Have you tried the [info( message?
Martin
please keep the clarity of 0.0-extended version name.
i'm still working with Pd-extended on older machines,
while at the same time doing development on more up-to-date systems.
keeping things 'in sync' is already a challenge enough.
rolf
___
Hey all
I was about to create a Deken package of comport, but realized, there
are some behaviors I don't understand.
I do have some patches that indicate the right outlet of comport did
once output some sensible messages, like 'open 1' when the connection
is established and 'open 0' when the
On 03/03/2017 07:42 AM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
> Well, I did check the versions and this is what I got...
machine readable format?
> the ones I
> couldn't find the version I marked as "not versioned"; and I think they
> could just be "0.0.1" or something.
how's that better than
16 matches
Mail list logo