Re: [PD] how-do-i-install-externals-and-help-files page (was Re: Linux Global folder for externals)

2017-03-03 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
2017-03-03 19:20 GMT-03:00 Roman Haefeli : > After putting deken-plugin.tcl into extra/, don't you see a message from > Deken in the Pd-console when you start Pd? > no, I don't > I must assume you downloaded deken-plugin.tcl by copy from browser > to Microsoft Word and

Re: [PD] how-do-i-install-externals-and-help-files page (was Re: Linux Global folder for externals)

2017-03-03 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Fre, 2017-03-03 at 18:55 -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > > > 2017-03-03 18:36 GMT-03:00 Roman Haefeli : > > > > Follow my instructions. > I did, quite carefully, didn't work as I said, I also did other stuff > that I described, and didn't work as well. Please be

Re: [PD] how-do-i-install-externals-and-help-files page (was Re: Linux Global folder for externals)

2017-03-03 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
2017-03-03 18:36 GMT-03:00 Roman Haefeli : > > Follow my instructions. > I did, quite carefully, didn't work as I said, I also did other stuff that I described, and didn't work as well. ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list

Re: [PD] how-do-i-install-externals-and-help-files page (was Re: Linux Global folder for externals)

2017-03-03 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
thanks roman for the detailed instructions (and the patience). that's exactly how it's meant to be. On 03/03/2017 10:36 PM, Roman Haefeli wrote: > Both can co-exist just fine. The one in extra/ has precedence > over the included one. just a small amendment here: the one in extra/ *only* has

Re: [PD] how-do-i-install-externals-and-help-files page (was Re: Linux Global folder for externals)

2017-03-03 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hey Alex On Fre, 2017-03-03 at 18:19 -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > > > 2017-03-03 17:32 GMT-03:00 Roman Haefeli : > > > > No, you just need to put it into a search path of Pd. If your goal > > is > > to test whether the most recent change works (creation of the

Re: [PD] how-do-i-install-externals-and-help-files page (was Re: Linux Global folder for externals)

2017-03-03 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
2017-03-03 17:32 GMT-03:00 Roman Haefeli : > > No, you just need to put it into a search path of Pd. If your goal is > to test whether the most recent change works (creation of the user > specific folder), then you obviously can't use that, you may put it > into the

Re: [PD] how-do-i-install-externals-and-help-files page (was Re: Linux Global folder for externals)

2017-03-03 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Don, 2017-03-02 at 20:22 -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > > > 2017-03-02 19:17 GMT-03:00 IOhannes m zmölnig : > > > > for starters, you could just follow the instructions on > >    https://github.com/pure-data/deken/#download > I had done that, but downloading 

Re: [PD] versions of libraries from extended in deken (was Different versions of iemguts library in Deken)

2017-03-03 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
2017-03-03 9:45 GMT-03:00 : > please keep the clarity of 0.0-extended version name. Hi, I got your message separate from the others and missed it for a while, in another thread, I'm responding here so it's in the same thread for me... Can you explain what you think is "clear"

Re: [PD] versions of libraries from extended in deken (was Different versions of iemguts library in Deken)

2017-03-03 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
2017-03-03 6:01 GMT-03:00 : > > machine readable format? > please explain what is and what do you mean by "machine readable format"? 2017-03-03 6:01 GMT-03:00 : > On 03-03-17 07:42, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > > could just be "0.0.1" or something. > >

Re: [PD] versions of libraries from extended in deken (was Different versions of iemguts library in Deken)

2017-03-03 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
2017-03-03 10:54 GMT-03:00 Fred Jan Kraan : > On 03-03-17 07:42, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > > could just be "0.0.1" or something. The one thing I dont get is tof, I >> couldn't find the version, but there's a new one in deken as 0.2.1, >> maybe call it 0.2 then? But I

Re: [PD] comport - right outlet outputs only '-1'

2017-03-03 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Fre, 2017-03-03 at 08:35 -0500, Martin Peach wrote: > On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 4:55 AM, Roman Haefeli > wrote: >   > >  * Wouldn't it be good if there'd be some 'report' message that > > would  > >    trigger a dump of the current inner state, like 'xonxoff 0, > > stopbit > >

Re: [PD] versions of libraries from extended in deken (was Different versions of iemguts library in Deken)

2017-03-03 Thread Fred Jan Kraan
On 03-03-17 07:42, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: could just be "0.0.1" or something. The one thing I dont get is tof, I couldn't find the version, but there's a new one in deken as 0.2.1, maybe call it 0.2 then? But I wonder how that version name came up... here's tof's git

Re: [PD] comport - right outlet outputs only '-1'

2017-03-03 Thread Martin Peach
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 4:55 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote: > * Wouldn't it be good if there'd be some 'report' message that would >trigger a dump of the current inner state, like 'xonxoff 0, stopbit >2, parity 0' etc. > > Have you tried the [info( message? Martin

Re: [PD] versions of libraries from extended in deken (was > Different versions of iemguts library in Deken)

2017-03-03 Thread rolfm
please keep the clarity of 0.0-extended version name. i'm still working with Pd-extended on older machines, while at the same time doing development on more up-to-date systems. keeping things 'in sync' is already a challenge enough. rolf ___

[PD] comport - right outlet outputs only '-1'

2017-03-03 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hey all I was about to create a Deken package of comport, but realized, there are some behaviors I don't understand. I do have some patches that indicate the right outlet of comport did once output some sensible messages, like 'open 1' when the connection is established and 'open 0' when the

Re: [PD] versions of libraries from extended in deken (was Different versions of iemguts library in Deken)

2017-03-03 Thread zmoelnig
On 03/03/2017 07:42 AM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > Well, I did check the versions and this is what I got... machine readable format? > the ones I > couldn't find the version I marked as "not versioned"; and I think they > could just be "0.0.1" or something. how's that better than