Re: [PD] using bob~ with libpd for android

2017-06-22 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
again, sorry, I need step by step, objective information on what I'd have to do inside Android Studio to make this happen. If you never used Android Studio, if you're just giving me general ideas, I get it, but it doesn't do it for me, unfoirtunately. thanks 2017-06-23 0:42 GMT-03:00 Giulio Moro

Re: [PD] using bob~ with libpd for android

2017-06-22 Thread Giulio Moro via Pd-list
What EXTRA=true does when building with the Makefile is that it adds in the .o files generated by the .c files in Pure-data/extras to the prerequisites for the library and links them in. In practice, if you can add the .c files in extras/ so that they get compiled and linked in by your project

Re: [PD] using bob~ with libpd for android

2017-06-22 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
I just use Android Studio, it has its own environment and scheme, so I followed the tutorial by rafael fernandez. This issue is more about using libpd inside android studio then building libpd for android. Not sure if this makes sense or is in fact true, but it's how I see it. Seems I have to do

Re: [PD] using bob~ with libpd for android

2017-06-22 Thread Giulio Moro via Pd-list
I have no idea how you build libpd for Android (I also assume that you are building it yourself). When I build it for Linux I do something like: `make EXTRA=true <>` that flag `EXTRA=true` makes sure that the extras are compiled and linked into the `libpd.so` file.I hope the above can be somehow

Re: [PD] using bob~ with libpd for android

2017-06-22 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
> I think you need to make libpd with EXTRA=true or something sorry, I'm really a dummy in this field, I need more detailed steps, information thanks 2017-06-22 21:54 GMT-03:00 Giulio Moro : > I think you need to make libpd with EXTRA=true or something like that in > order

Re: [PD] using bob~ with libpd for android

2017-06-22 Thread Giulio Moro via Pd-list
I think you need to make libpd with EXTRA=true or something like that in order to include the extras in the libpd library file without need for extra files. Or at least that's how it works on linux/mac, no idea about android. Just double check in the build log that bob~.o actually gets compiled

[PD] using bob~ with libpd for android

2017-06-22 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
Hi, I'm testing the usage of externals with libpd, sarting with the ones that come with Pd, like [bob~]. I'm using libpd for android. I'm on a MacOS Sierra, and using Android Studio's emulator. I made it through Rafael's tutorial

Re: [PD] soundhack PD externals

2017-06-22 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
On 06/22/2017 04:57 PM, Pagano, Patrick wrote: > [spigot~] ... were fun. speaking of [spigot~]: could - after all these years - somebody explain to me the difference to [*~]? fgmrdsa IOhannes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [PD] Kinect Windows 10

2017-06-22 Thread hi via Pd-list
now I am looking for a compiled version of pix_freenect for windows! anyone?? Am 22.06.2017 um 13:06 schrieb hi : > Dear Pd gang > > I try to get [pix_freenect] to work under windows 10. Does anyone of you have > any experience with that? > > Also I could use

Re: [PD] Redundant declaration in s_stuff.h

2017-06-22 Thread Miller Puckette
I'm attempting to go through the open pull requests now... but I'm doing them in old-to-new order so it will take me some time to get to the more recent ones. cheers Miller On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 04:33:29PM +0200, Antoine Villeret wrote: > hi, > > few weeks ago I faced to "redundant

Re: [PD] soundhack PD externals

2017-06-22 Thread Pagano, Patrick
Thank you Tom for soundhack, Alexandre for else and all the other wonderful things you are doing! Since we are chatting about externals and updates I have a question about unauthorized, i would love to use some of those externals on linux32 but they always fail with reference to libspeex.so.*

[PD] Redundant declaration in s_stuff.h

2017-06-22 Thread Antoine Villeret
hi, few weeks ago I faced to "redundant declaration of..." and "multiple definition of..." errors when building a library I'm working on for Puredata. I fixed all those issues and send a PR : https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/62 I would like to know if this PR have any chances to be

Re: [PD] Find: Found object not in front

2017-06-22 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2017-06-22 13:05, ro...@dds.nl wrote: > hi, > > when using Find in Vanilla 0.47.1, the window of a found object doesn't > come in front. > > in my memory it did in 'earlier days'. > > i'm on Windows 10, where Pdext-43.4 still does it. > > so i suppose the OS is not the culprit. > working

[PD] Find: Found object not in front

2017-06-22 Thread rolfm
hi, when using Find in Vanilla 0.47.1, the window of a found object doesn't come in front. in my memory it did in 'earlier days'. i'm on Windows 10, where Pdext-43.4 still does it. so i suppose the OS is not the culprit. can i do something to get the 'in front appearance' back? rolf

[PD] Kinect Windows 10

2017-06-22 Thread hi via Pd-list
Dear Pd gang I try to get [pix_freenect] to work under windows 10. Does anyone of you have any experience with that? Also I could use some help compiling on windows, 'cause i try to build libfreenect myself with less than no success. still hoping: Jonas