2018-05-20 10:31 GMT-03:00 Christof Ressi :
>
> * [delete( message for [pointer]: deletes the scalar of the currently
> stored pointer.
>
+1
___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
that's the hack I've described in link provided by Derek :-)
I think there a two major issues with Pd's GUI:
* the Tk canvas (I believe) doesn't offer any kind of spatial partitioning, so
it has to check each item if it's visible (or maybe just draws all of them).
OTOH, Qt offers the
Just thought of this after sending the previous mail. I can't try this
hack, but it might work. To delete a scalar:
- get the scalar's x/y coordinates
- use mouse messages to select and delete anything over that pixel.
Drawbacks:
- will delete anything else over that pixel (affects the
as I recall, in a mail Miller said that it wasn't easy to implement a
"delete" (or "previous" etc.) methods, because it would mix up the pointer
structures. But most likely I'm remembering incorrectly.
The lag with scalars is a real thing, as with any other canvas with lots
of gui objects
Roman Haefeli writes:
> Hey all
>
> Following up a thread from 2011:
> https://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2011-04/088306.html
>
> I would like to know whether it is impossible to delete a specific
> scalar, by pointer. If so, why is that? Does it use a design that
Ingo Stock writes:
> Now this works without error messages, combining some of the approaches
> in this thread.
>
> ingo
>
>
> On 05/15/2018 03:47 PM, Ingo Stock wrote:
>> But it works by creating the message with set and changing messages!
>>
>> [set obj 30 30 array define,