I'd love to see that ported to Windows pd. SDR is fun! I didn't know
someone wrote an external for it.
Kylee
On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 6:03 PM Alexandre Torres Porres
wrote:
>
> Em sáb., 6 de fev. de 2021 às 22:23, bbob escreveu:
>
>> Alexandre
>>
>> pretty obscure, i'm sure, but I have a
Em sáb., 6 de fev. de 2021 às 22:23, bbob escreveu:
> Alexandre
>
> pretty obscure, i'm sure, but I have a project using Tom Zicarelli's
> 32bit pd-rtlsdr library (https://github.com/tkzic/pd-rtlsdr). I've
> written to Tom a couple times to ask if he's ever thinking about updating
> it... or if
Alexandre
pretty obscure, i'm sure, but I have a project using Tom Zicarelli's
32bit pd-rtlsdr library (https://github.com/tkzic/pd-rtlsdr). I've written
to Tom a couple times to ask if he's ever thinking about updating it... or
if not, if he'd allow someone else to, though I wouldn't have the
They all operate on binbufs internally, so there shouldn't be a
significant performance difference.
On 06.02.2021 23:18, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
I guess the advantage is if it runs faster or not, right?
Em sáb., 6 de fev. de 2021 às 18:03, Christof Ressi
I guess the advantage is if it runs faster or not, right?
Em sáb., 6 de fev. de 2021 às 18:03, Christof Ressi
escreveu:
> > are there any concrete advantages?
> What's the advantage of having two different objects for the same job?
> If you like [textfile] for its simple interface, keep using
On Sat, 2021-02-06 at 23:02 +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> On Sat, 2021-02-06 at 22:55 +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> > On Sat, 2021-02-06 at 00:36 +0100, João Pais wrote:
> > > I'm preparing a patch using [netsend -u -b], sending to
> > > 192.168.178.255
> > > with my home devices. This was
On Sat, 2021-02-06 at 22:55 +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> On Sat, 2021-02-06 at 00:36 +0100, João Pais wrote:
> > I'm preparing a patch using [netsend -u -b], sending to
> > 192.168.178.255
> > with my home devices. This was working quite well, but suddenly one
> > of
> > them stopped sending
On Sat, 2021-02-06 at 00:36 +0100, João Pais wrote:
>
> I'm preparing a patch using [netsend -u -b], sending to
> 192.168.178.255
> with my home devices. This was working quite well, but suddenly one
> of
> them stopped sending data to this address
Does the outlet of [netsend] indicate that it
are there any concrete advantages?
What's the advantage of having two different objects for the same job?
If you like [textfile] for its simple interface, keep using it. I'm just
saying that it's more or less obsolete.
On 06.02.2021 16:38, João Pais wrote:
It is surely overall more powerful.
no problem, I still have pd 32b and just installed office 32b
Am 06.02.2021 um 18:49 schrieb Alexandre Torres Porres:
> in windows that's not a problem, it's common to have 64+32b software
running
So the newest system is 64 bits but can run 32 bits like macOS mojave
and earlier, right? Just
> in windows that's not a problem, it's common to have 64+32b software
running
So the newest system is 64 bits but can run 32 bits like macOS mojave and
earlier, right? Just wanna get it 100% straight. I guess that's the same
with Linux, therefore the greatest concern is with macs indeed
Em
So y'all can also answer me why you need 32 builds of
windows/linux, if it has to do with externals only being available
for 32 bits. Cause my main concern is to upgrade "relevant"
libraries. But I mentioned macOS cause that's where I can really
help most.
We all know new
Em sáb., 6 de fev. de 2021 às 12:45, Alexandre Torres Porres <
por...@gmail.com> escreveu:
>
> So y'all can also answer me why you need 32 builds of windows/linux, if it
> has to do with externals only being available for 32 bits. Cause my main
> concern is to upgrade "relevant" libraries. But I
64-bit Pd works fine on macOS 11 (Big Sur). As far as I recall, all of the
external builds from Pd-extended were compiled as "fat libs" with ppc, 32, & 64
bit intel.
On a related note:
The bigger move is to support Apple's new arm64 architecture (currently the M1
cpu). I have a new MBP with
that's for windows, right?
i was asking for macOS, but in fact I could and should expand the question
to all systems!
So y'all can also answer me why you need 32 builds of windows/linux, if it
has to do with externals only being available for 32 bits. Cause my main
concern is to upgrade
It is surely overall more powerful. But when using it just for read/get
whole lines/save, are there any concrete advantages?
[text define] is basically a more powerful and flexible replacement
for [textfile] and [qlist]. I would only use [textfile] if you prefer
the simpler interface or need
"my" external [leapmotion] still only exists for 32b, at some point I'll
have to hire someone to upgrade the port if I do something with it on
64b - https://github.com/jmmmp/Pd_Leapmotion_win
But that's surely not considered relevant, probably no one at all
besides me uses it.
Joao
I was
Em sáb., 6 de fev. de 2021 às 11:53, Jean-Marie Adrien <
jm.adrien@gmail.com> escreveu:
> What about big sur ?
I installed it just to test, I don't really use it, but I could install Pd
and also get an old library like "unauthorized" from deken and it worked.
I tested the "grid" GUI
Hi
Still using 32 bits pd, (and also 64 bits) : 32 bits are necessary not for PD
itself, but for drivers of external hardware working with pd, because
applications based on pd integrate many hardware pieces, some of them old, and
obtaining a stabilized and cheap integrated hardware set is some
[text define] is basically a more powerful and flexible replacement for
[textfile] and [qlist]. I would only use [textfile] if you prefer the
simpler interface or need the [add2( method. Personally, I only use
[text define].
Christof
On 06.02.2021 14:28, João Pais wrote:
Hi list,
for
I was discussing this with Eric Lyon cause we're getting an official
fftease 3.0 release out soon (heads up).
It seems that people who need this are the ones who still use some
externals that were only compiled for 32 bits. So I guess the question
should be "which relevant externals are still
Hi list,
for simple read/get/save operation, are there are advantages on using
[text define] instead of [textfile]?
Best,
jmmmp
___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
22 matches
Mail list logo
