On Tue, 2022-12-20 at 10:43 +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> On 12/20/22 08:10, Lucas Cordiviola wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > you should *not* convert the list to a symbol:
>
> totally.
> [l2s] just adds a lot of overhead, for no benefit.
The reason it used to work even with [l2s] is unrelated to 3
On 12/20/22 08:10, Lucas Cordiviola wrote:
hi,
you should *not* convert the list to a symbol:
totally.
[l2s] just adds a lot of overhead, for no benefit.
you should send a list so that later [route] can do its job:
[pack 0 0 ]
|
[list prepend send]
|
[netsend]
that should read
|
[li
hi,
you should *not* convert the list to a symbol:
{l2s} -> (send $1>
you should send a list so that later [route] can do its job:
[pack 0 0 ]
|
[list prepend send]
|
[netsend]
--
Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas.
On 20/12/2022 03:00, Jean-Marie Adrien wrote:
Hello list
Hello list
Upgrading some old historical patches I wrote twenty five years ago (yeah, some
of you were not born!) with having two instances of PD extended 32 bits
communicating with each other, via
{netsend} and {netreceive} objects.
The need was to send from one instance two the other a messag
