Re: [PD] Miller's Moogfilter

2015-06-23 Thread Julian Brooks
ka> >> danomatika.com >> robotcowboy.com >> >> On Jun 16, 2015, at 1:27 AM, pd-list-requ...@lists.iem.at wrote: >> >> *From: *Billy Stiltner >> *Subject: **Re: [PD] Miller's Moogfilter* >> *Date: *June 16, 2015

Re: [PD] Miller's Moogfilter

2015-06-20 Thread Billy Stiltner
, at 1:27 AM, pd-list-requ...@lists.iem.at wrote: > > *From: *Billy Stiltner > *Subject: **Re: [PD] Miller's Moogfilter* > *Date: *June 16, 2015 at 12:06:54 AM EDT > *To: *"pd-list@lists.iem.at" > > > Finally got around to trying the new bob~ filter. > Works reall

Re: [PD] Miller's Moogfilter

2015-06-18 Thread Chris McCormick
On 19/06/15 01:36, Julian Brooks wrote: > Billy, any chance you could put a self-contained patch together to demo > your technique - love to hear it. Me too! Chris. -- http://mccormick.cx/ ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account

Re: [PD] Miller's Moogfilter

2015-06-18 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
> > It's time for a big thank you for the driving forces behind Pd > community. > We love you developers :) ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] Miller's Moogfilter

2015-06-18 Thread Julian Brooks
Wilcox > @danomatika <https://twitter.com/danomatika> > danomatika.com > robotcowboy.com > > On Jun 16, 2015, at 1:27 AM, pd-list-requ...@lists.iem.at wrote: > > *From: *Billy Stiltner > *Subject: **Re: [PD] Miller's Moogfilter* > *Date: *June 16, 2015 at 12:06:

Re: [PD] Miller's Moogfilter

2015-06-18 Thread Roman Haefeli
1:27 AM, pd-list-requ...@lists.iem.at wrote: > > > > From: Billy Stiltner > > > > Subject: Re: [PD] Miller's Moogfilter > > > > Date: June 16, 2015 at 12:06:54 AM EDT > > > > To: "pd-list@li

Re: [PD] Miller's Moogfilter

2015-06-18 Thread Dan Wilcox
: > > From: Billy Stiltner <mailto:billy.stilt...@gmail.com>> > Subject: Re: [PD] Miller's Moogfilter > Date: June 16, 2015 at 12:06:54 AM EDT > To: "pd-list@lists.iem.at <mailto:pd-list@lists.iem.at>" > mailto:pd-list@lists.iem.at>> >

Re: [PD] Miller's Moogfilter

2015-06-15 Thread Billy Stiltner
Finally got around to trying the new bob~ filter. Works really really great. I found that my keyboard (midi note) scaling of frequency logic was causing the frequency to go way too high when modulating thefilter frequency so I can use a kb tracking value of < 1 and the squelching doesn't happen.

Re: [PD] Miller's Moogfilter

2015-02-13 Thread Billy Stiltner
the q is what I meant I guess. sometimes I use lfo or envelope to modulate the q I think I probably just need to reduce the range of my control down to a safe level to keep the thing from squalling at high frequencies. :) On 2/13/15, Miller Puckette wrote: > The resonant frequency is a signal inp

Re: [PD] Miller's Moogfilter

2015-02-13 Thread Miller Puckette
The resonant frequency is a signal input - you shouldn't have to use snapshot~ to convert that to a message. On reading this, it seems to me I should make the "resonance" a separate signal input too. (It wasn't voltage controlled on the original module, but that's no reason not to allow it now :

Re: [PD] Miller's Moogfilter

2015-02-13 Thread Billy Stiltner
the resonance is touchy on that thing, still trying to figure out what to do about it, maybe i need to decrease the range of the control i use to adjust it from 0 to 10 or 4 or whatever it is to 0 - 1 or 2. also the frequency adjustment is not as forgiving on the high end as the other filters i use

Re: [PD] Miller's Moogfilter

2015-01-17 Thread Dan Wilcox
> On Jan 17, 2015, at 5:22 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > > awesome, I heard something about [expr] having license issues with libpd, and > I can't live without it, some functionalities are only in it as well (like > the tanh function). So maybe now I guess I can think of making some mobi

Re: [PD] Miller's Moogfilter

2015-01-17 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
awesome, I heard something about [expr] having license issues with libpd, and I can't live without it, some functionalities are only in it as well (like the tanh function). So maybe now I guess I can think of making some mobile patches ;) Does this bob~ work for you anyway Dan? I tried working on

Re: [PD] Miller's Moogfilter

2015-01-17 Thread Dan Wilcox
> On Jan 17, 2015, at 3:09 AM, pd-list-requ...@lists.iem.at wrote: > > Also dynamic loading works fine, the issue was libpd was being built without > HAVE_LIBDL defined. Actually I was wrong about this. The basic c lib is built with HAVE_LIBDL, but I wasn’t using it in the Xcode project or in o

Re: [PD] Miller's Moogfilter

2015-01-17 Thread Dan Wilcox
ts.iem.at wrote: > > From: Miller Puckette mailto:m...@ucsd.edu>> > Cc: pd-list@lists.iem.at <mailto:pd-list@lists.iem.at> > To: Joel Matthys mailto:jwmatt...@gmail.com>> > Date: January 14, 2015 at 6:46:03 PM EST > Subject: Re: [PD] Miller's Moogfilter > &g

Re: [PD] Miller's Moogfilter

2015-01-15 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
yeah, thanks, I could try it now, sounds damn good to me ;) cheers 2015-01-15 3:02 GMT-02:00 Joel Matthys : > I compiled a pd_darwin version (not fat, just i386). > > It's here: http://joel.matthysmusic.com/bob~.pd_darwin > > Joel > > > On 01/14/2015 05:46 PM, Miller Puckette wrote: > >> I'll get

Re: [PD] Miller's Moogfilter

2015-01-14 Thread Joel Matthys
I compiled a pd_darwin version (not fat, just i386). It's here: http://joel.matthysmusic.com/bob~.pd_darwin Joel On 01/14/2015 05:46 PM, Miller Puckette wrote: I'll get it cross-compiled at some point - if I throw it in vanilla it'll happen automatically, but if I end up figuring it's better l

Re: [PD] Miller's Moogfilter

2015-01-14 Thread David Medine
I can do it. If not this afternoon, in a day or two... On 1/14/2015 3:25 PM, Joel Matthys wrote: Is there anyone out there who could compile a Win32 version for me? I need a patch to work cross-platform, and I can handle the Linux and Darwin compiles but I don't have build access to a Windoze m

Re: [PD] Miller's Moogfilter

2015-01-14 Thread Miller Puckette
I'll get it cross-compiled at some point - if I throw it in vanilla it'll happen automatically, but if I end up figuring it's better left separate I'll put it out as a self-contained muiltiplatform extern. I'd be more disposed to put it in 'extra' if it ever works out to include 'extra' objects

Re: [PD] Miller's Moogfilter

2015-01-14 Thread Joel Matthys
Is there anyone out there who could compile a Win32 version for me? I need a patch to work cross-platform, and I can handle the Linux and Darwin compiles but I don't have build access to a Windoze machine at the moment. Thanks for sharing this, Miller! Joel On 01/14/2015 02:18 PM, Miller Puc

Re: [PD] Miller's Moogfilter

2015-01-14 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
thanks, I vote for it being included in extra, anyone else :) ? 2015-01-14 18:18 GMT-02:00 Miller Puckette : > I had put out an mf~ object as part of a seminar a few years ago, but > didn't take the time to clean it up for wider use. This morning I did > at least some cleanup and change the name

Re: [PD] Miller's Moogfilter

2015-01-14 Thread Miller Puckette
I had put out an mf~ object as part of a seminar a few years ago, but didn't take the time to clean it up for wider use. This morning I did at least some cleanup and change the name to a more appropriate "bob~" (named after Moog :) and have put a copy here: http://msp.ucsd.edu/tmp/bob~.tgz I'm c

[PD] Miller's Moogfilter

2015-01-13 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Miller Puckette http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list>> wrote: >* You can have mine... http://msp.ucsd.edu/tmp/moogfilter.tgz > *>>* cheers *>* Miller* Hmm, It ain't still there :P anyone has it? Billy? Miller? che