However, cool to have tests in Pd ;)
For the name : Pure DAT (Pure Data Auto Tests).
Too close to Pure Data ? Sure !
++
Jacj
Le 08/06/2020 à 17:55, Jack a écrit :
> For french people, after "pd", we have "pedant" :D
> I love !
> https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/p%C3%A9dant
> ++
>
> Jack
>
>
>
For french people, after "pd", we have "pedant" :D
I love !
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/p%C3%A9dant
++
Jack
Le 08/06/2020 à 17:40, Christof Ressi a écrit :
> Big thumps up for test suits! BTW, IOhannes has already been working on
> a testing framework for Pd: https://git.iem.at/pd/pedant
>
Big thumps up for test suits! BTW, IOhannes has already been working on
a testing framework for Pd: https://git.iem.at/pd/pedant
Christof
On 08.06.2020 17:34, Mario Buoninfante wrote:
Yap, in the end I put a [receive] in the patch as a workaround.
I'll open a ticket on github then, I suppose
Yap, in the end I put a [receive] in the patch as a workaround.
I'll open a ticket on github then, I suppose this could be useful.
Just to give you a bit more context here, the reason why I'm asking for
this is because I'm prototyping a test suite for Pd - ie for "continuous
integration' or
