There is still the access to computational power challenge, unless we
make a seti@home-like speech recognition crawler which in and of itself
has similar ethical implications.
On 2/7/2015 12:55 PM, Spencer Russell wrote:
I saw a really interesting talk last year by Johan Schalkwyk, the head
Hi list,
Here's a fun thought-experiment: suppose you're doing a port of Pd, and the
graphics toolkit you're using will include functionality to hook in to Google's
speech recognition API. Such an API could make the software accessible to
people who would otherwise find it very hard to write
One of the bad things about Google is that it is essentially a giant
billboard. Having said that, I am going to advertise a couple of things.
If you want a speech recognition API that doesn't rely on a tax-exempt
corporation that has more money than the nation of Russia, builds its
products
Could context and domain-specific applications also simplify the algorithms to
a great degree?
-Jonathan
On Saturday, February 7, 2015 1:06 PM, Spencer Russell spen...@ssfrr.com
wrote:
I saw a really interesting talk last year by Johan Schalkwyk, the head of the
Google speech
Thanks, I didn't know there was a Sphinx external. It also looks like the
Sphinx website got a face-lift-- hopefully the software is also more
approachable than the last time I looked.
-Jonathan
On Saturday, February 7, 2015 2:16 PM, david medine dmed...@ucsd.edu
wrote:
One of
Just a quick disclaimer about the extern. It's little more than a Pd
wrapper for the sphinx hello world example. The build environment works,
though (and was a real pain to get right on Linux because of some
function name conflicts between sphinx and Pd), so it's a good jumping
off point for
