Re: [PD] vline~ with switch~ off

2017-06-08 Thread Christof Ressi
t; An: "Matt Davey" <hard@gmail.com> > Cc: "pd-list@lists.iem.at" <pd-list@lists.iem.at> > Betreff: Re: [PD] vline~ with switch~ off > > This isn't fixed (and I'm not sure it's fixable)... better use spigots to stop > messages from gettingt o vline~s on sw

Re: [PD] vline~ with switch~ off

2017-06-08 Thread alex
On 06/08/2017 05:21 AM, Miller Puckette wrote: This isn't fixed (and I'm not sure it's fixable)... better use spigots to stop messages from gettingt o vline~s on switched-off windows. cheers Miller Didn't see Miller's answer before I posted mine, sorry.

Re: [PD] vline~ with switch~ off

2017-06-07 Thread Claude Heiland-Allen
On 08/06/17 03:21, Miller Puckette wrote: > This isn't fixed (and I'm not sure it's fixable)... better use spigots to stop > messages from gettingt o vline~s on switched-off windows. what about this approach? one issue of my implementation is that it prunes segments too early if the block size

Re: [PD] vline~ with switch~ off

2017-06-07 Thread Miller Puckette
This isn't fixed (and I'm not sure it's fixable)... better use spigots to stop messages from gettingt o vline~s on switched-off windows. cheers Miller On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 03:28:36AM +0200, Matt Davey wrote: > is this still an issue? I have heaps of patches with vline~ in, and CPU > seems to

[PD] vline~ with switch~ off

2017-06-07 Thread Matt Davey
is this still an issue? I have heaps of patches with vline~ in, and CPU seems to creep up from them getting messages when switch~ is off. I thought this got looked at? Actuallyis there any way just to turn off all control messages in patches that have [switch~] turned off? I mean, how