Re: [PD] [bob~] denormals issue?

2016-09-22 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2016-09-22 01:10, David Medine wrote: > x = (x signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] [bob~] denormals issue?

2016-09-21 Thread David Medine
;katjavet...@gmail.com> An: "Christof Ressi" <christof.re...@gmx.at> Cc: "pd-list@lists.iem.at" <pd-list@lists.iem.at> Betreff: Re: Re: Re: [PD] [bob~] denormals issue? Without -O flags you get debug-level and all function inlining is disabled, depending on the code

Re: [PD] [bob~] denormals issue?

2016-09-21 Thread katja
t; >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. September 2016 um 23:47 Uhr >> Von: katja <katjavet...@gmail.com> >> An: "Christof Ressi" <christof.re...@gmx.at> >> Cc: "pd-list@lists.iem.at" <pd-list@lists.iem.at> >> Betreff: Re: Re: Re: [PD]

Re: [PD] [bob~] denormals issue?

2016-09-21 Thread Miller Puckette
t...@gmail.com> > > An: "Christof Ressi" <christof.re...@gmx.at> > > Cc: "pd-list@lists.iem.at" <pd-list@lists.iem.at> > > Betreff: Re: Re: Re: [PD] [bob~] denormals issue? > > > > Without -O flags you get debug-level and all functio

Re: [PD] [bob~] denormals issue?

2016-09-21 Thread Christof Ressi
t; > > >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. September 2016 um 22:47 Uhr > >> Von: katja <katjavet...@gmail.com> > >> An: "Christof Ressi" <christof.re...@gmx.at>, "pd-list@lists.iem.at" > >> <pd-list@lists.iem.at> > >> Be

Re: [PD] [bob~] denormals issue?

2016-09-21 Thread Miller Puckette
definitely! Maybe using the PD_BIGORSMALL macro on each filter state at > >> > the end of the DSP routine does the trick, just like in all the other > >> > recursive filters in Pd. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >> Von: katja

Re: [PD] [bob~] denormals issue?

2016-09-21 Thread katja
<christof.re...@gmx.at>, "pd-list@lists.iem.at" >> <pd-list@lists.iem.at> >> Betreff: Re: Re: [PD] [bob~] denormals issue? >> >> I'm curious to know if the flags do flush denormals on your processor. >> Forgot to mention that '-O3 -ffast-math

Re: [PD] [bob~] denormals issue?

2016-09-21 Thread Christof Ressi
something to do with the compiler? > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. September 2016 um 22:47 Uhr > Von: katja <katjavet...@gmail.com> > An: "Christof Ressi" <christof.re...@gmx.at>, "pd-list@lists.iem.at" > <pd-list@lists.iem.at> > Betreff: Re: Re:

Re: [PD] [bob~] denormals issue?

2016-09-21 Thread Christof Ressi
other recursive filters in Pd. > Von: katja <katjavet...@gmail.com> > An: "Christof Ressi" <christof.re...@gmx.at> > Cc: pd-list <pd-l...@iem.at>, "Miller Puckette" <m...@ucsd.edu> > Betreff: Re: [PD] [bob~] denormals issue? > > Hi Chri

Re: [PD] [bob~] denormals issue?

2016-09-21 Thread katja
Hi Christof, Makefile.pdlibbuilder passes flags '-march=pentium4 -msse -msse2 -mfpmath=sse' for optimization to the compiler on Windows. You could try compiling without (some of) these flags to see if they are responsible for the different behavior. Makefile-defined optimization flags can be