On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Antoine Rousseau
wrote:
> So then, Pd is indeed running with RT?
>
>
> I think so. Try:
> pd -verbose -stderr
>
> and you should read:
>
> "priority 6 scheduling enabled."
>
That did it! I did get the "priority 6 scheduling enabled." message,
>
> So then, Pd is indeed running with RT?
I think so. Try:
pd -verbose -stderr
and you should read:
"priority 6 scheduling enabled."
if jack support is compiled in, or:
"priority 92 scheduling enabled."
if not.
If you hadn't the rights for real time, a simple:
pd
would print:
"priority 92
> Hi,
>
> I've proposed pull request #39 (https://github.com/pure-data/
> pure-data/pull/39) to fix this (RT status not printed to console any
> more).
>
> In the meantime, if you don't get related error message (and you don't
> specify -nrt) then RT should be enabled.
>
So then, Pd is indeed
Hi,
I've proposed pull request #39 (https://github.com/pure-data/
pure-data/pull/39) to fix this (RT status not printed to console any more).
In the meantime, if you don't get related error message (and you don't
specify -nrt) then RT should be enabled.
Antoine Rousseau
http://www.metalu.net
I'm not sure but I think if Pd is running with jack support compiled in it
gets prioriy 6/8 and if not, 95/97 (which is how I originally had set it,
but jack imposes its own priority levels).
cheers
Miller
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 08:29:34AM +0200, katja wrote:
> Which Pd version do you run? I
Which Pd version do you run? I remember having the same issue with Pd
on Raspberry Pi some years ago. Pd at that time asked for rtprio 99
and didn't get it with jackd default settings. In response Miller has
then changed Pd's rtprio requirement to 95 (I don't remember which Pd
version exactly, it