Re: [PD] expr is now BSD (was "looking for other vanilla filters or abstractions for libPD")

> The whole license thing was kind of a pain to figure out as nobody seemed to > know the technicalities at the time. Did you contact one of the various organizations that handle licensing issues for free software communities? -Jonathan On Thursday, November 12, 2015 8:10 PM, Dan Wilcox

Re: [PD] expr is now BSD (was "looking for other vanilla filters or abstractions for libPD")

Obviously not. :P Dan Wilcox @danomatika danomatika.com robotcowboy.com > On Nov 13, 2015, at 8:34 AM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: > > > The whole license thing was kind of a pain to

Re: [PD] expr is now BSD (was "looking for other vanilla filters or abstractions for libPD")

Seriously though, I *think* I was the one who suggested LGPL when we did this the first time, so it’s on me. The whole license thing was kind of a pain to figure out as nobody seemed to know the technicalities at the time. I personally favor GPL licenses, but they obviously don’t work with

Re: [PD] expr is now BSD (was "looking for other vanilla filters or abstractions for libPD")

Oh, I was just waiting for you to tell us what to do. :D Dan Wilcox @danomatika danomatika.com robotcowboy.com > On Nov 12, 2015, at 5:49 PM, pd-list-requ...@lists.iem.at wrote: > > I suggest this