Re: [PD] Audio streaming for 3 or more channels?

2014-07-25 Thread Bektur
I’ve tried the multicast option with same setup, but unfortunately I’m getting the same issue (bad header tag error and distorted sound). Just out of curiosity I recorded the audio output I was getting Best regards, Bektur On Jul 25, 2014, at 3:25 AM, Martin Peach martin.pe...@sympatico.ca

Re: [PD] message-box bug ?

2014-07-25 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
On 07/25/2014 11:31 AM, Fero Kiraly wrote: but how I did manage it is really unclear. all messageboxes were created by the same processs. care to explain the process? gfnsdr IOhannes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___

Re: [PD] [bp~] really equal to [vcf~]?

2014-07-25 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
On 07/24/2014 10:14 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: vcf~ isn't a 2-pole real filter but a 1-pole complex one kinda relative to this, since biquad~ can be emulated with 2 complex poles + 2 complex zeros it can not only be emulated, it can be implemented with a complex 2-pole/2-zero filter.

Re: [PD] message-box bug ?

2014-07-25 Thread Fero Kiraly
many thanks iohannes ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] [bp~] really equal to [vcf~]?

2014-07-25 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
it's accurate to say that [biquad~] is a real-valued 2-pole/2-zero filter. but why, if the poles and zeros can have complex values? 2014-07-25 8:18 GMT-03:00 IOhannes m zmölnig zmoel...@iem.at: On 07/24/2014 10:14 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: vcf~ isn't a 2-pole real filter but a

Re: [PD] [bp~] really equal to [vcf~]?

2014-07-25 Thread Claude Heiland-Allen
On 25/07/14 14:36, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: it's accurate to say that [biquad~] is a real-valued 2-pole/2-zero filter. but why, if the poles and zeros can have complex values? If the poles (zeros) occur in as a complex conjugate pair (with identical real parts and opposite imaginary

Re: [PD] [bp~] really equal to [vcf~]?

2014-07-25 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
Having only real coeffecients for biquad forces the poles (zeros) to take this form. yeah, that makes sense. The tricky part seems to be how a complex conjugate pair does that too. Is it because you'd add them up and then the imaginary part becomes zero? That's what I can think of...

Re: [PD] [bp~] really equal to [vcf~]?

2014-07-25 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
On 07/25/2014 03:36 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: it's accurate to say that [biquad~] is a real-valued 2-pole/2-zero filter. but why, if the poles and zeros can have complex values? can they? afaict, [biquad~] only ever has real-valued coefficients and states. df,ase IOhannes

Re: [PD] [bp~] really equal to [vcf~]?

2014-07-25 Thread Claude Heiland-Allen
On 25/07/14 16:06, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: On 07/25/2014 03:36 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: it's accurate to say that [biquad~] is a real-valued 2-pole/2-zero filter. but why, if the poles and zeros can have complex values? can they? Yes, but they occur in conjugate pairs, as the

[PD] error when i try to compile pmpd

2014-07-25 Thread Jack
Hello, after : cd .../pmpd $ make I get : cc -I/usr/include/pd -DPD -DVERSION='0.10-svn' -fPIC -W -g -O6 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -o pmpd2d.o -c pmpd2d.c In file included from pmpd2d.c:34:0: pmpd2d.h:1:1: error: expected identifier or ‘(’ before ‘’ token .mine ^ pmpd2d.h:5:0: