Re: [PD] Updated Pd-Extended

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2014-09-30 04:39, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list wrote: * pull in relevant commits from pd-vanilla (you can't just pull them all in because vanilla does the GUI stuff differently, does it? fgmasdr IOhannes -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version:

Re: [PD] Fwd: PDCon (was Updated pd-extended)

Hi all, Although I'm very aware that the Pd pendulum is very much hovering over North America and there are more than enough people who could very well organise the next PdCon (and I especially don't wish to tread on any toes - Chuck's for one), I do have an alternate offer: If there is willing

Re: [PD] Updated Pd-Extended

Those bullet points are from the webpage, not written by me. My questions about the bullet points were inline, e.g.: Does this refer to the single-line change in pd-gui.tcl pertaining to the font scaling, or something bigger? If it's something bigger then that's a real drag. And by font

Re: [PD] list foreach?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2014-09-30 12:20, Frank Barknecht wrote: Hi, I see that there now are the rather peculiar list fromsymbol and list tosymbol methods in [list], but the much needed list foreach still is missing. Why? most likely, because yo can do a [list

Re: [PD] Updated Pd-Extended

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2014-09-30 15:32, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list wrote: Those bullet points are from the webpage, not written by me. My questions about the bullet points were inline, e.g.: ah sorry. my email client seems to have messed up with quoting (at

Re: [PD] help_pix_buffer

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2014-09-30 10:20, Sujay Mukherjee wrote: I don't have a prior programming knowledge of any kind and so my questions could be a little bit naive I am using the the pix_buffer along with the pix_buffer_write and pix_buffer _read objects to

Re: [PD] help compiling recent GEM

Hi Johannes, I get the bug of the inverted colors in version of Gem ver: 0.93.git 8032816 today I tried to compile the version taken from https://github.com/umlaeute/Gem but I get this error: ... gemglxwindow.cpp:670:4: warning: #warning context-sharing disabled [-Wcpp] gemglxwindow.cpp: In

Re: [PD] list foreach?

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 03:51:38PM +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: On 2014-09-30 12:20, Frank Barknecht wrote: I see that there now are the rather peculiar list fromsymbol and list tosymbol methods in [list], but the much needed list foreach still is missing. Why? most likely, because

Re: [PD] list foreach?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2014-09-30 17:08, Frank Barknecht wrote: On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 03:51:38PM +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: On 2014-09-30 12:20, Frank Barknecht wrote: I see that there now are the rather peculiar list fromsymbol and list tosymbol methods

Re: [PD] list foreach?

Hi, On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 06:20:21PM +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: re-reading your email, wouldn't [list cat] be the equivalent of [list drip], whereas [list foreach] is the equivalent of [list map]? I took theses name from the source in x_list.c, where for some years now we have: //

Re: [PD] list foreach?

[list cat] is already in Pd-l2ork. -Jonathan On Tuesday, September 30, 2014 4:24 PM, Frank Barknecht f...@footils.org wrote: Hi, On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 06:20:21PM +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: re-reading your email, wouldn't [list cat] be the equivalent of [list drip], whereas

[PD] A piece on EE Cummings

Hi all, I want to share this work with you. It's a PD rendition of EE Cummings' Me Up At Does [requires ratts~]. http://pallthayer.dyndns.org/cummings.tar.gz Best r. Pall Thayer -- * Pall Thayer artist http://pallthayer.dyndns.org *