Re: [PD] [OT]: Gitorious closing down.. alternatives, suggetions, experiences
Hi all, Thanks for the responses and ideas. Of course I can just use 'pure' git (or some wrapper from other services)... The idea was to import all projects from Girorious to GitLab and that everything would 'just work'. 'Cloud' provider is handy for onine access/pointing for publi projects.. I do have my private stuff backed up on in private places, and I'm ok with the 'point of faliures' you all mentions in exchange for the commodity. Lorenzo. On 17/04/2015 00:58, phil jones wrote: GitHub IS very convenient. But it is a single point of failure or potential abuse. I keep public projects there, but I wouldn't NOT also keep private repositories in sync with it on my own machines. Also, I think it's dangerous to let GitHub become the official address of your project. Have a separate home-page / blog that you control that's the official home page, news of your project. That way, if you need to leave GitHub (either because it goes down or suddenly their terms of service become onerous) you can quickly update the page you own with a link to a new public repository. Git itself was designed to be flexible enough that you can even use it over email so git itself doesn't become a bottleneck. Phil On 16 April 2015 at 12:47, Dan Wilcox danomat...@gmail.com mailto:danomat...@gmail.com wrote: The same concern is true for any Git host, including Sourceforge, Gitlab/Gitorious, etc. One problem is too many people now think “GitHub” is “Git” and don;t realize that they can push/pull form basically anywhere. Dan Wilcox @danomatika danomatika.com http://danomatika.com robotcowboy.com http://robotcowboy.com On Apr 16, 2015, at 11:36 AM, Rafael Vega email.r...@gmail.com mailto:email.r...@gmail.com wrote: On the flip side, git is a distributed system but we're all putting our repos on a single host (github). ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
[PD] mp3amp~ for windows
Hi - I'm trying to use the mp3amp~ object, but it is not recognised on my windows machine. I've downloaded the unauthorised package from here http://puredata.info/downloads/unauthorized and other objects work, but not mp3amp~ Can anyone direct me to a windows version? ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] [Bulk] pd in a eurorack modular system
I think my Model B took closer to a minute to fully boot and start my Pd patch. The Model 2 seems a little faster, maybe 30 seconds or less, but unfortunately I don't think an almost instant boot time is realistic (I would LOVE to be proven wrong on this). It's definitely one of the more frustrating things, if you want to use the Pi at a gig or something. Then again, it could be a lot worse. The determining factors will probably be what distro you're using, and how many services have to be started up at the very beginning. -Brian On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Alessio Degani alessio.deg...@ymail.com wrote: On 15/04/2015 11:28, Joe White wrote: Pretty much instant AFAIK Hi, I've asked that question to a friend of mine, that uses Raspberry PI, model A (I think...), and he told me that has a boot time of about 34 seconds. It is different from model to model (i.e. model B, A+)? Or there are some trick (i.e. different OS, or whatelse...) to achieve an almost instant boot time? Thank you -- a. ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] [Bulk] pd in a eurorack modular system
On 15/04/2015 11:28, Joe White wrote: Pretty much instant AFAIK Hi, I've asked that question to a friend of mine, that uses Raspberry PI, model A (I think...), and he told me that has a boot time of about 34 seconds. It is different from model to model (i.e. model B, A+)? Or there are some trick (i.e. different OS, or whatelse...) to achieve an almost instant boot time? Thank you -- a. ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] [Bulk] pd in a eurorack modular system
Boot time for Raspbian varies with sd card class as well, but indeed it is in the order of half a minute even for RPi 2 with class 10 card. Maybe they've used a different OS for Nebulae, or programmed on bare metal? Katja On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 8:39 PM, Brian Fay ovaltinevor...@gmail.com wrote: I think my Model B took closer to a minute to fully boot and start my Pd patch. The Model 2 seems a little faster, maybe 30 seconds or less, but unfortunately I don't think an almost instant boot time is realistic (I would LOVE to be proven wrong on this). It's definitely one of the more frustrating things, if you want to use the Pi at a gig or something. Then again, it could be a lot worse. The determining factors will probably be what distro you're using, and how many services have to be started up at the very beginning. -Brian On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Alessio Degani alessio.deg...@ymail.com wrote: On 15/04/2015 11:28, Joe White wrote: Pretty much instant AFAIK Hi, I've asked that question to a friend of mine, that uses Raspberry PI, model A (I think...), and he told me that has a boot time of about 34 seconds. It is different from model to model (i.e. model B, A+)? Or there are some trick (i.e. different OS, or whatelse...) to achieve an almost instant boot time? Thank you -- a. ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] pd in a eurorack modular system
2015-04-15 0:57 GMT+02:00 Tilo Kremer p...@dadacafe.org: Hello, On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Peter P. peterpar...@fastmail.com wrote: * Pagano, Patrick p...@digitalworlds.ufl.edu [2015-04-13 19:53]: Hi I am building my first modualr system with a little grant money i got for research. For the first 1000$ i got a beginner Pittsburgh Modular system and one envelope module. FOr the second 1000$ to complete the grant i am considering you might be interested in the axoloti project: http://axoloti.be/ while the board is not exactly in euro form factor it should be possible to include it into a modular setup (i am going to try exactly that as soon as i get a board) The board design allows the midi part to be cut off in order to fit vertical mounting in Eurorack. Mounting holes and solder holes are also provided to connect and mount the midi part after separation. For Eurorack connectivity, voltage levels for control voltage in- and output must still be shifted from 0..3.3V to 10V externally and thus will require some DIY work. from https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/axoloti-a-digital-audio-platform-for-makers#comments gr, Tim hth, tee ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
[PD] converting audio pulses to bang
Hi folks, I've been recently using CV from modular synths to control Pd, and they do send audio pulses for controls (bangs in Pd). I know Supercollider usually trigger processes with pulse audios in a similar manner, by the way, but I digress. That is to say that Pd mostly deals with control bang messages. So, getting to the point. I've been using the usual audio to control conversion, but at every sample to be really accurate and right on the spot. So I'm using [vsnapshot~] with very fast metro bang to get values all the time. I just think that this method is a bit clumsy or complicated. Maybe it could be achieved more simply. Maybe there could be an external that could bang at the exact same time as the output of an object like [impulse~], or an on/off message (1, 0) according to the output of a [train~] object. You know what I mean? cheers ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
[PD] number of soundcard channels and cpu cost
Hi there, recently, I had to use the adat outputs of my audio card in Pd, but these channesl are from 16 to 24 (they skip all the analog outs plus some other things like SPDIF). My question is, if I ask Pd to work with that much audio outputs (24 of them), but only use a couple of outputs (like [dac~ 17 20] for example), is it more expensive on the CPU compared to if I only have 2 outputs and use [dac~ 1 2]? In short, does the cost depend only in the number of outputs in a [dac~] object? Moreover, does the number of [dac~] objects make a difference? For instance, having one [dac~] with many outputs costs the same as different [dac~] objects for each output? I always had the idea that too many outputs could really mean a lot more cpu cost, but I'm not sure now if that cost is really real or relevant. what do you say? thanks ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
