Re: [PD] Pure Data Buffir~ object

2015-09-06 Thread Fred Jan Kraan
On 2015-09-06 03:55 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > On 09/05/2015 11:58 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: >> >> Anyway, I don't believe 4096 is such a costy even if doing this increases >> cmputation time. And we still have other options like [partconv~] and >> [FIR~] in Pd. But in practice I

Re: [PD] Pure Data Buffir~ object

2015-09-06 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
yeah, I was thinking about this versatility. I guess "better" isn't a good word. I was thinking "more powerful" 2015-09-06 17:24 GMT-03:00 Fred Jan Kraan : > On 2015-09-06 03:55 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > > On 09/05/2015 11:58 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > >> > >>

Re: [PD] changing font size overall

2015-09-06 Thread Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list
On 09/06/2015 03:28 PM, Miller Puckette wrote: What's this "outlook" that Pd-ext knows how to scale? It probably has to do with the voodoo behind the tkscaling value. That's the only relevant part that would be different between the two. -Jonathan thanks M rolf NB for now there is

Re: [PD] changing font size overall

2015-09-06 Thread rolfm
cyrille wrote: when i put for example -font-size 16 in the command line it doesn't have any effect. rolf ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] changing font size overall

2015-09-06 Thread IOhannes zmölnig
Am 06. September 2015 13:47:40 MESZ, schrieb ro...@dds.nl: > >when i put for example -font-size 16 in the command line it doesn't >have any effect. > I'm pretty sure it does work. However, the font-size is saved in the patch, so it only has an effect on new patches... mfg.ugd.fhj IOhannes

Re: [PD] Pure Data Buffir~ object

2015-09-06 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
On 09/05/2015 11:58 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > Unfortunately, Max does not have a partitioned convolution object, I think > that there had to be one... but whatever... probably. but not our problem :-) > > Anyway, I don't believe 4096 is such a costy even if doing this increases >

Re: [PD] Pure Data Buffir~ object

2015-09-06 Thread Fred Jan Kraan
Hi Alexandre, > Hmm, so you say the object will compute the maximum table size no matter > if we're using just, say, 128 samples? Even if the arraysize of the > impulse response is just 128? As if it would always consume more CPU > even with the same smaller impulses? No, only the number of

Re: [PD] changing font size overall

2015-09-06 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Sun, 2015-09-06 at 13:47 +0200, ro...@dds.nl wrote: > cyrille wrote: > > when i put for example -font-size 16 in the command line it doesn't > have any effect. It seems that option only affects the default font size for _new_ patcher windows. Pre-existing patches are not affected. Roman

Re: [PD] changing font size overall

2015-09-06 Thread Ivica Bukvic
Pd has per-iemgui-object and per-abstraction font settings, so changing font size only affects non-iemgui objects in the currently focused patch and its non-abstraction subpatches. What you may be looking for is a zoom level which does not exist (yet). HTH Best, -- Ivica Ico Bukvic, D.M.A.

Re: [PD] changing font size overall

2015-09-06 Thread rolfm
Ivica wrote: Pd has per-iemgui-object and per-abstraction font settings, so changing font size only affects non-iemgui objects in the currently focused patch and its non-abstraction subpatches. What you may be looking for is a zoom level which does not exist (yet). HTH sometimes i work with

Re: [PD] changing font size overall

2015-09-06 Thread Miller Puckette
What's this "outlook" that Pd-ext knows how to scale? thanks M > > rolf > > NB for now there is probably no practical solution for me. > > ___ > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >