Re: [PD] Array List View

I use it often to check if the array has received new values, sometimes it is used to change array values. ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] Array List View

That looks good Jonathan. In current array list view the entries are grouped per 1000 and arrows let you switch groups. For 'large' arrays (say one second of audio samples) this is inconvenient. Maybe your patch approach could even provide a better solution, like the option to select a specific

Re: [PD] SineFill (sinesum, but for all phases) in Pd?

I'm including an abstraction for that in my array-abs library, but haven't implemented it yet. https://github.com/brbrofsvl/array-abs On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > Hi, in SC they got this SineFill command, which can generate waveforms as >

Re: [PD] expr is now BSD (was "looking for other vanilla filters or abstractions for libPD")

> The whole license thing was kind of a pain to figure out as nobody seemed to > know the technicalities at the time. Did you contact one of the various organizations that handle licensing issues for free software communities? -Jonathan On Thursday, November 12, 2015 8:10 PM, Dan Wilcox

Re: [PD] Compiling gem for Vanilla on Mac OS 10.9.5

On 11/13/2015 01:18 AM, Reed Perkins wrote: > So I followed the instructions exactly until I reached the "configure" and on 11/13/2015 02:32 AM, Reed Perkins wrote: > When I run "./autogen.sh" I get a bunch of stuff and then this: > "configure:15171: error: possibly undefined macro:

Re: [PD] Compiling gem for Vanilla on Mac OS 10.9.5

I definitely did install gettext. I followed the instructions exactly for building it as well as getting it through brew. Right now the gettext folder is sitting on my downloads folder. Does it need to be somewhere else for this to work? Thanks! > On Nov 13, 2015, at 12:00 PM, IOhannes m

Re: [PD] expr is now BSD (was "looking for other vanilla filters or abstractions for libPD")

Obviously not. :P Dan Wilcox @danomatika danomatika.com robotcowboy.com > On Nov 13, 2015, at 8:34 AM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: > > > The whole license thing was kind of a pain to

Re: [PD] Array List View

Thanks.  That sounds like all the more reason to have this as a Pd patch instead.  Even if I add a little mechanism to poll the area for changes, it's going to be discoverable inside a subpatch.  That means if there is trouble, any user can open it and inspect the innards. -Jonathan

Re: [PD] Array List View

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: > hi katja, > I don't understand that last paragraph. Why would you need to close the > array list view for an audio-length array? From what I can tell it's not > "live"-- that > is, it doesn't automatically update its

Re: [PD] consistency check failed: signal_free 4

IS there an easy way to get teh error message with a simple patch? It's probably a bug in Pd. cheers Miller On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 08:57:47AM +0900, Jonghyun Kim wrote: > hi list, > > "consistency check failed: signal_free 4" > > this error occured on mac OS X Yosemite. > > how to resolve

[PD] brown/grey noise in pd

hi, wondering how to implement brown noise in Pd (vanilla or extended) - moreover, I'd like and if there's an external that does it. same about grey noise thanks alex ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->

[PD] consistency check failed: signal_free 4

hi list, "consistency check failed: signal_free 4" this error occured on mac OS X Yosemite. how to resolve this error? thanks, akntk ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->

Re: [PD] I07.phase.vocoder reports "adc~: no method for 'bang'"

The inlet takes a "set" message to reassign its input channel (this is mentioned in the help window). That's the only message it takes - anything else flags an error. cheers Miller On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:09:39PM -0500, William Huston wrote: > Hi all, > > Using 0.46-7 (latest?) > > In

Re: [PD] brown/grey noise in pd

You can get an approximate brown noise by running a noise source through [fexpr~ if(abs($x+$y)>1.0,$y-$x,$x+$y)] (an integrator with +/- 1 bounds. Scale your noise source by somewhere in the 0.05 to 0.001 range (I don't know the exact value). If you want a quasi-gaussian noise source, you can

[PD] SineFill (sinesum, but for all phases) in Pd?

Hi, in SC they got this SineFill command, which can generate waveforms as a sum of sine harmonics but with all possible phases. Is there anything like it in Pd? I know there isn't in Vanilla, but maybe some other object that manage arrays has implemented this. Sounds like something cool to have.